Cargando…

Effects of a home-based rehabilitation program in community-dwelling older people after discharge from hospital: A subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether pre-admission community mobility explains the effects of a rehabilitation program on physical performance and activity in older adults recently discharged from hospital. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Home and community. PARTICIP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katri Maria, Turunen, Laura, Aaltonen-Määttä, Erja, Portegijs, Timo, Rantalainen, Sirkka, Keikkala, Marja-Liisa, Kinnunen, Sarianna, Sipilä, Riku, Nikander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33749349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692155211001672
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To examine whether pre-admission community mobility explains the effects of a rehabilitation program on physical performance and activity in older adults recently discharged from hospital. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Home and community. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling adults aged ⩾60 years recovering from a lower limb or back injury, surgery or other disorder who were randomized to a rehabilitation (n = 59) or standard care control (n = 58) group. They were further classified into subgroups that were not planned a priori: (1) mild, (2) moderate, or (3) severe pre-admission restrictions in community mobility. INTERVENTIONS: The 6-month intervention consisted of a motivational interview, goal attainment process, guidance for safe walking, a progressive home exercise program, physical activity counselling, and standard care. MEASUREMENTS: Physical performance was measured with the Short Physical Performance Battery and physical activity with accelerometers and self-reports. Data were analysed by generalized estimating equation models with the interactions of intervention, time, and subgroup. RESULTS: Rehabilitation improved physical performance more in the intervention (n = 30) than in the control group (n = 28) among participants with moderate mobility restriction: score of the Short Physical Performance Battery was 4.4 ± 2.3 and 4.2 ± 2.2 at baseline, and 7.3 ± 2.6 and 5.8 ± 2.9 at 6 months in the intervention and control group, respectively (mean difference 1.6 points, 95% Confidence Interval 0.2 to 3.1). Rehabilitation did not increase accelerometer-based physical activity in the aforementioned subgroup and did not benefit those with either mild or severe mobility restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-admission mobility may determine the response to the largely counselling-based rehabilitation program.