Cargando…

Continuous Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring in Thyroid Surgery: Can Amplitude Be a Standardized Parameter?

The objective of this study is to evaluate electromyographic waveforms related to vagus monitoring. We collected data from patients undergoing thyroidectomy with CIONM, regardless of vocal cord response amplitude initially measured. We divided data of 193 nerves into three groups, according to initi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazzone, Sara, Esposito, Adelaide, Giacomarra, Vittorio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34413831
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.714699
_version_ 1783739411241893888
author Mazzone, Sara
Esposito, Adelaide
Giacomarra, Vittorio
author_facet Mazzone, Sara
Esposito, Adelaide
Giacomarra, Vittorio
author_sort Mazzone, Sara
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study is to evaluate electromyographic waveforms related to vagus monitoring. We collected data from patients undergoing thyroidectomy with CIONM, regardless of vocal cord response amplitude initially measured. We divided data of 193 nerves into three groups, according to initial amplitude value: ≥500 µV (Group 1,110 pt.), between 100 and 500 µV (Group 2, 79 pt.), and <100 µV (Group 3, 4 pt.). ROC curve showed a high diagnostic accuracy of final amplitude absolute value in vocal cord paralysis detection in both groups (89 and 86%). An increase of vocal cord paralysis risk was associated with progressive amplitude reduction (Group 1: OR=1.05, CI=1.02–1.09, p=0.001; Group 2: OR=1.05, CI=1.02–1.08, p=0.002). Cut-off values for amplitude reduction with optimal sensitivity and specificity were −77% in Group 1 and −15% in Group 2. In Group 3 signals showed an amplitude <100 µV for all monitoring, with no loss of a recognizable signal and normal postoperative cordal functionality. The use of a strict amplitude signal cut-off value ≥500 µV could be too restrictive. Also, signal with baseline amplitude <500 µV may be considered equally adequate. Setting the alarm for a reduction of 77% in patients with initial amplitude ≥500 µV and of 15% for those <500 µV could make monitoring safe and an effective aid for surgeons. In conclusion, there are cases in which initial amplitude is lower than that considered as adequate by current literature but with well recognizable and stable EMG waveforms. How those cases should be approached and what should the surgeon’s attitude be are a matter of discussion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8370105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83701052021-08-18 Continuous Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring in Thyroid Surgery: Can Amplitude Be a Standardized Parameter? Mazzone, Sara Esposito, Adelaide Giacomarra, Vittorio Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology The objective of this study is to evaluate electromyographic waveforms related to vagus monitoring. We collected data from patients undergoing thyroidectomy with CIONM, regardless of vocal cord response amplitude initially measured. We divided data of 193 nerves into three groups, according to initial amplitude value: ≥500 µV (Group 1,110 pt.), between 100 and 500 µV (Group 2, 79 pt.), and <100 µV (Group 3, 4 pt.). ROC curve showed a high diagnostic accuracy of final amplitude absolute value in vocal cord paralysis detection in both groups (89 and 86%). An increase of vocal cord paralysis risk was associated with progressive amplitude reduction (Group 1: OR=1.05, CI=1.02–1.09, p=0.001; Group 2: OR=1.05, CI=1.02–1.08, p=0.002). Cut-off values for amplitude reduction with optimal sensitivity and specificity were −77% in Group 1 and −15% in Group 2. In Group 3 signals showed an amplitude <100 µV for all monitoring, with no loss of a recognizable signal and normal postoperative cordal functionality. The use of a strict amplitude signal cut-off value ≥500 µV could be too restrictive. Also, signal with baseline amplitude <500 µV may be considered equally adequate. Setting the alarm for a reduction of 77% in patients with initial amplitude ≥500 µV and of 15% for those <500 µV could make monitoring safe and an effective aid for surgeons. In conclusion, there are cases in which initial amplitude is lower than that considered as adequate by current literature but with well recognizable and stable EMG waveforms. How those cases should be approached and what should the surgeon’s attitude be are a matter of discussion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8370105/ /pubmed/34413831 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.714699 Text en Copyright © 2021 Mazzone, Esposito and Giacomarra https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Mazzone, Sara
Esposito, Adelaide
Giacomarra, Vittorio
Continuous Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring in Thyroid Surgery: Can Amplitude Be a Standardized Parameter?
title Continuous Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring in Thyroid Surgery: Can Amplitude Be a Standardized Parameter?
title_full Continuous Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring in Thyroid Surgery: Can Amplitude Be a Standardized Parameter?
title_fullStr Continuous Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring in Thyroid Surgery: Can Amplitude Be a Standardized Parameter?
title_full_unstemmed Continuous Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring in Thyroid Surgery: Can Amplitude Be a Standardized Parameter?
title_short Continuous Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring in Thyroid Surgery: Can Amplitude Be a Standardized Parameter?
title_sort continuous intraoperative nerve monitoring in thyroid surgery: can amplitude be a standardized parameter?
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34413831
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.714699
work_keys_str_mv AT mazzonesara continuousintraoperativenervemonitoringinthyroidsurgerycanamplitudebeastandardizedparameter
AT espositoadelaide continuousintraoperativenervemonitoringinthyroidsurgerycanamplitudebeastandardizedparameter
AT giacomarravittorio continuousintraoperativenervemonitoringinthyroidsurgerycanamplitudebeastandardizedparameter