Cargando…
Role of a Digital Clinical Decision–Support System in General Practitioners’ Management of COPD in Norway
BACKGROUND: The study investigated if a web-based clinical decision–support system (CDSS) tool would improve general practitioners’ (GPs) accuracy of diagnosis and classification of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and whether nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatme...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34413641 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S319753 |
_version_ | 1783739471244558336 |
---|---|
author | Vijayakumar, Varun Kumar Mustafa, Tehmina Nore, Bjarte Kjell Garatun-Tjeldstø, Kjell Yngvard Næss, Øystein Johansen, Odd Erik Aarli, Bernt Bøgvald |
author_facet | Vijayakumar, Varun Kumar Mustafa, Tehmina Nore, Bjarte Kjell Garatun-Tjeldstø, Kjell Yngvard Næss, Øystein Johansen, Odd Erik Aarli, Bernt Bøgvald |
author_sort | Vijayakumar, Varun Kumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The study investigated if a web-based clinical decision–support system (CDSS) tool would improve general practitioners’ (GPs) accuracy of diagnosis and classification of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and whether nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatment would be better aligned with the COPD guidelines. METHODS: GPs were randomized to either a single use of the CDSS or continuing standard of care. The clinical recommendations of the CDSS were based on the GOLD guidelines and provided suggestions for treatment and management of COPD. Data were collected digitally from GPs and patients in both groups using a tablet computer. A follow-up questionnaire was sent to the GPs 1 year after the conclusion of the study. RESULTS: A total of 25 GPs (31% women, mean age 41 years) participated, 12 randomized to using the CDSS tool and 13 followed standard of care when assessing their next five to ten COPD patients. In sum, 149 patients with presumed COPD were included (88 CDSS group, 61 standard-of-care group). In the CDSS group, no COPD misdiagnoses occurred, 98% received vaccine recommendations, and all smokers (n=39) received smoking-cessation advice. The standard-of-care group had 23% misdiagnosis (P<0.001), only 67% received vaccine recommendations (P<0.001), and 87% smoking-cessation advice (P=0.022. All told, 31% of patients did not receive medication as recommended according to guidelines, with no significant differences between the groups. GPs rated the CDSS as very useful. Mean usage time was 3 minutes, 26 seconds. A majority (13 of 19, 68%) of the GPs continued using the CDSS after the conclusion of the study. CAT score identified twice as many patients as having more symptoms than the mMRC, indicating the added value of the multi-item questionnaire. CONCLUSION: Use of the CDSS was associated with preventing misdiagnosis of COPD and improved adherence to recommended nonpharmacological measures, but a single use did not improve pharmacological treatment considerations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8370595 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83705952021-08-18 Role of a Digital Clinical Decision–Support System in General Practitioners’ Management of COPD in Norway Vijayakumar, Varun Kumar Mustafa, Tehmina Nore, Bjarte Kjell Garatun-Tjeldstø, Kjell Yngvard Næss, Øystein Johansen, Odd Erik Aarli, Bernt Bøgvald Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: The study investigated if a web-based clinical decision–support system (CDSS) tool would improve general practitioners’ (GPs) accuracy of diagnosis and classification of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and whether nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatment would be better aligned with the COPD guidelines. METHODS: GPs were randomized to either a single use of the CDSS or continuing standard of care. The clinical recommendations of the CDSS were based on the GOLD guidelines and provided suggestions for treatment and management of COPD. Data were collected digitally from GPs and patients in both groups using a tablet computer. A follow-up questionnaire was sent to the GPs 1 year after the conclusion of the study. RESULTS: A total of 25 GPs (31% women, mean age 41 years) participated, 12 randomized to using the CDSS tool and 13 followed standard of care when assessing their next five to ten COPD patients. In sum, 149 patients with presumed COPD were included (88 CDSS group, 61 standard-of-care group). In the CDSS group, no COPD misdiagnoses occurred, 98% received vaccine recommendations, and all smokers (n=39) received smoking-cessation advice. The standard-of-care group had 23% misdiagnosis (P<0.001), only 67% received vaccine recommendations (P<0.001), and 87% smoking-cessation advice (P=0.022. All told, 31% of patients did not receive medication as recommended according to guidelines, with no significant differences between the groups. GPs rated the CDSS as very useful. Mean usage time was 3 minutes, 26 seconds. A majority (13 of 19, 68%) of the GPs continued using the CDSS after the conclusion of the study. CAT score identified twice as many patients as having more symptoms than the mMRC, indicating the added value of the multi-item questionnaire. CONCLUSION: Use of the CDSS was associated with preventing misdiagnosis of COPD and improved adherence to recommended nonpharmacological measures, but a single use did not improve pharmacological treatment considerations. Dove 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8370595/ /pubmed/34413641 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S319753 Text en © 2021 Vijayakumar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Vijayakumar, Varun Kumar Mustafa, Tehmina Nore, Bjarte Kjell Garatun-Tjeldstø, Kjell Yngvard Næss, Øystein Johansen, Odd Erik Aarli, Bernt Bøgvald Role of a Digital Clinical Decision–Support System in General Practitioners’ Management of COPD in Norway |
title | Role of a Digital Clinical Decision–Support System in General Practitioners’ Management of COPD in Norway |
title_full | Role of a Digital Clinical Decision–Support System in General Practitioners’ Management of COPD in Norway |
title_fullStr | Role of a Digital Clinical Decision–Support System in General Practitioners’ Management of COPD in Norway |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of a Digital Clinical Decision–Support System in General Practitioners’ Management of COPD in Norway |
title_short | Role of a Digital Clinical Decision–Support System in General Practitioners’ Management of COPD in Norway |
title_sort | role of a digital clinical decision–support system in general practitioners’ management of copd in norway |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34413641 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S319753 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vijayakumarvarunkumar roleofadigitalclinicaldecisionsupportsystemingeneralpractitionersmanagementofcopdinnorway AT mustafatehmina roleofadigitalclinicaldecisionsupportsystemingeneralpractitionersmanagementofcopdinnorway AT norebjartekjell roleofadigitalclinicaldecisionsupportsystemingeneralpractitionersmanagementofcopdinnorway AT garatuntjeldstøkjellyngvard roleofadigitalclinicaldecisionsupportsystemingeneralpractitionersmanagementofcopdinnorway AT næssøystein roleofadigitalclinicaldecisionsupportsystemingeneralpractitionersmanagementofcopdinnorway AT johansenodderik roleofadigitalclinicaldecisionsupportsystemingeneralpractitionersmanagementofcopdinnorway AT aarliberntbøgvald roleofadigitalclinicaldecisionsupportsystemingeneralpractitionersmanagementofcopdinnorway |