Cargando…

Role of a Digital Clinical Decision–Support System in General Practitioners’ Management of COPD in Norway

BACKGROUND: The study investigated if a web-based clinical decision–support system (CDSS) tool would improve general practitioners’ (GPs) accuracy of diagnosis and classification of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and whether nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vijayakumar, Varun Kumar, Mustafa, Tehmina, Nore, Bjarte Kjell, Garatun-Tjeldstø, Kjell Yngvard, Næss, Øystein, Johansen, Odd Erik, Aarli, Bernt Bøgvald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34413641
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S319753
_version_ 1783739471244558336
author Vijayakumar, Varun Kumar
Mustafa, Tehmina
Nore, Bjarte Kjell
Garatun-Tjeldstø, Kjell Yngvard
Næss, Øystein
Johansen, Odd Erik
Aarli, Bernt Bøgvald
author_facet Vijayakumar, Varun Kumar
Mustafa, Tehmina
Nore, Bjarte Kjell
Garatun-Tjeldstø, Kjell Yngvard
Næss, Øystein
Johansen, Odd Erik
Aarli, Bernt Bøgvald
author_sort Vijayakumar, Varun Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The study investigated if a web-based clinical decision–support system (CDSS) tool would improve general practitioners’ (GPs) accuracy of diagnosis and classification of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and whether nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatment would be better aligned with the COPD guidelines. METHODS: GPs were randomized to either a single use of the CDSS or continuing standard of care. The clinical recommendations of the CDSS were based on the GOLD guidelines and provided suggestions for treatment and management of COPD. Data were collected digitally from GPs and patients in both groups using a tablet computer. A follow-up questionnaire was sent to the GPs 1 year after the conclusion of the study. RESULTS: A total of 25 GPs (31% women, mean age 41 years) participated, 12 randomized to using the CDSS tool and 13 followed standard of care when assessing their next five to ten COPD patients. In sum, 149 patients with presumed COPD were included (88 CDSS group, 61 standard-of-care group). In the CDSS group, no COPD misdiagnoses occurred, 98% received vaccine recommendations, and all smokers (n=39) received smoking-cessation advice. The standard-of-care group had 23% misdiagnosis (P<0.001), only 67% received vaccine recommendations (P<0.001), and 87% smoking-cessation advice (P=0.022. All told, 31% of patients did not receive medication as recommended according to guidelines, with no significant differences between the groups. GPs rated the CDSS as very useful. Mean usage time was 3 minutes, 26 seconds. A majority (13 of 19, 68%) of the GPs continued using the CDSS after the conclusion of the study. CAT score identified twice as many patients as having more symptoms than the mMRC, indicating the added value of the multi-item questionnaire. CONCLUSION: Use of the CDSS was associated with preventing misdiagnosis of COPD and improved adherence to recommended nonpharmacological measures, but a single use did not improve pharmacological treatment considerations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8370595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83705952021-08-18 Role of a Digital Clinical Decision–Support System in General Practitioners’ Management of COPD in Norway Vijayakumar, Varun Kumar Mustafa, Tehmina Nore, Bjarte Kjell Garatun-Tjeldstø, Kjell Yngvard Næss, Øystein Johansen, Odd Erik Aarli, Bernt Bøgvald Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: The study investigated if a web-based clinical decision–support system (CDSS) tool would improve general practitioners’ (GPs) accuracy of diagnosis and classification of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and whether nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatment would be better aligned with the COPD guidelines. METHODS: GPs were randomized to either a single use of the CDSS or continuing standard of care. The clinical recommendations of the CDSS were based on the GOLD guidelines and provided suggestions for treatment and management of COPD. Data were collected digitally from GPs and patients in both groups using a tablet computer. A follow-up questionnaire was sent to the GPs 1 year after the conclusion of the study. RESULTS: A total of 25 GPs (31% women, mean age 41 years) participated, 12 randomized to using the CDSS tool and 13 followed standard of care when assessing their next five to ten COPD patients. In sum, 149 patients with presumed COPD were included (88 CDSS group, 61 standard-of-care group). In the CDSS group, no COPD misdiagnoses occurred, 98% received vaccine recommendations, and all smokers (n=39) received smoking-cessation advice. The standard-of-care group had 23% misdiagnosis (P<0.001), only 67% received vaccine recommendations (P<0.001), and 87% smoking-cessation advice (P=0.022. All told, 31% of patients did not receive medication as recommended according to guidelines, with no significant differences between the groups. GPs rated the CDSS as very useful. Mean usage time was 3 minutes, 26 seconds. A majority (13 of 19, 68%) of the GPs continued using the CDSS after the conclusion of the study. CAT score identified twice as many patients as having more symptoms than the mMRC, indicating the added value of the multi-item questionnaire. CONCLUSION: Use of the CDSS was associated with preventing misdiagnosis of COPD and improved adherence to recommended nonpharmacological measures, but a single use did not improve pharmacological treatment considerations. Dove 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8370595/ /pubmed/34413641 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S319753 Text en © 2021 Vijayakumar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Vijayakumar, Varun Kumar
Mustafa, Tehmina
Nore, Bjarte Kjell
Garatun-Tjeldstø, Kjell Yngvard
Næss, Øystein
Johansen, Odd Erik
Aarli, Bernt Bøgvald
Role of a Digital Clinical Decision–Support System in General Practitioners’ Management of COPD in Norway
title Role of a Digital Clinical Decision–Support System in General Practitioners’ Management of COPD in Norway
title_full Role of a Digital Clinical Decision–Support System in General Practitioners’ Management of COPD in Norway
title_fullStr Role of a Digital Clinical Decision–Support System in General Practitioners’ Management of COPD in Norway
title_full_unstemmed Role of a Digital Clinical Decision–Support System in General Practitioners’ Management of COPD in Norway
title_short Role of a Digital Clinical Decision–Support System in General Practitioners’ Management of COPD in Norway
title_sort role of a digital clinical decision–support system in general practitioners’ management of copd in norway
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34413641
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S319753
work_keys_str_mv AT vijayakumarvarunkumar roleofadigitalclinicaldecisionsupportsystemingeneralpractitionersmanagementofcopdinnorway
AT mustafatehmina roleofadigitalclinicaldecisionsupportsystemingeneralpractitionersmanagementofcopdinnorway
AT norebjartekjell roleofadigitalclinicaldecisionsupportsystemingeneralpractitionersmanagementofcopdinnorway
AT garatuntjeldstøkjellyngvard roleofadigitalclinicaldecisionsupportsystemingeneralpractitionersmanagementofcopdinnorway
AT næssøystein roleofadigitalclinicaldecisionsupportsystemingeneralpractitionersmanagementofcopdinnorway
AT johansenodderik roleofadigitalclinicaldecisionsupportsystemingeneralpractitionersmanagementofcopdinnorway
AT aarliberntbøgvald roleofadigitalclinicaldecisionsupportsystemingeneralpractitionersmanagementofcopdinnorway