Cargando…
Clinical validation of an open-access SARS-COV-2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays
Rapid tests for SARS-COV-2 infection are important tools for pandemic control, but current rapid tests are based on proprietary designs and reagents. We report clinical validation results of an open-access lateral flow assay (OA-LFA) design using commercially available materials and reagents, along...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34403456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256352 |
_version_ | 1783739477569568768 |
---|---|
author | Bachman, Christine M. Grant, Benjamin D. Anderson, Caitlin E. Alonzo, Luis F. Garing, Spencer Byrnes, Sam A. Rivera, Rafael Burkot, Stephen Ball, Alexey Stafford, James W. Wang, Wenbo Banik, Dipayan Keller, Matthew D. Cate, David M. Nichols, Kevin P. Weigl, Bernhard H. Dewan, Puneet |
author_facet | Bachman, Christine M. Grant, Benjamin D. Anderson, Caitlin E. Alonzo, Luis F. Garing, Spencer Byrnes, Sam A. Rivera, Rafael Burkot, Stephen Ball, Alexey Stafford, James W. Wang, Wenbo Banik, Dipayan Keller, Matthew D. Cate, David M. Nichols, Kevin P. Weigl, Bernhard H. Dewan, Puneet |
author_sort | Bachman, Christine M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rapid tests for SARS-COV-2 infection are important tools for pandemic control, but current rapid tests are based on proprietary designs and reagents. We report clinical validation results of an open-access lateral flow assay (OA-LFA) design using commercially available materials and reagents, along with RT-qPCR and commercially available comparators (BinaxNOW® and Sofia®). Adult patients with suspected COVID-19 based on clinical signs and symptoms, and with symptoms ≤7 days duration, underwent anterior nares (AN) sampling for the OA-LFA, Sofia®, BinaxNOW ™, and RT-qPCR, along with nasopharyngeal (NP) RT-qPCR. Results indicate a positive predictive agreement with NP sampling as 69% (60% -78%) OA-LFA, 74% (64% - 82%) Sofia®, and 82% (73% - 88%) BinaxNOW™. The implication for these results is that we provide an open-access LFA design that meets the minimum WHO target product profile for a rapid test, that virtually any diagnostic manufacturer could produce. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8370603 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83706032021-08-18 Clinical validation of an open-access SARS-COV-2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays Bachman, Christine M. Grant, Benjamin D. Anderson, Caitlin E. Alonzo, Luis F. Garing, Spencer Byrnes, Sam A. Rivera, Rafael Burkot, Stephen Ball, Alexey Stafford, James W. Wang, Wenbo Banik, Dipayan Keller, Matthew D. Cate, David M. Nichols, Kevin P. Weigl, Bernhard H. Dewan, Puneet PLoS One Research Article Rapid tests for SARS-COV-2 infection are important tools for pandemic control, but current rapid tests are based on proprietary designs and reagents. We report clinical validation results of an open-access lateral flow assay (OA-LFA) design using commercially available materials and reagents, along with RT-qPCR and commercially available comparators (BinaxNOW® and Sofia®). Adult patients with suspected COVID-19 based on clinical signs and symptoms, and with symptoms ≤7 days duration, underwent anterior nares (AN) sampling for the OA-LFA, Sofia®, BinaxNOW ™, and RT-qPCR, along with nasopharyngeal (NP) RT-qPCR. Results indicate a positive predictive agreement with NP sampling as 69% (60% -78%) OA-LFA, 74% (64% - 82%) Sofia®, and 82% (73% - 88%) BinaxNOW™. The implication for these results is that we provide an open-access LFA design that meets the minimum WHO target product profile for a rapid test, that virtually any diagnostic manufacturer could produce. Public Library of Science 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8370603/ /pubmed/34403456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256352 Text en © 2021 Bachman et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bachman, Christine M. Grant, Benjamin D. Anderson, Caitlin E. Alonzo, Luis F. Garing, Spencer Byrnes, Sam A. Rivera, Rafael Burkot, Stephen Ball, Alexey Stafford, James W. Wang, Wenbo Banik, Dipayan Keller, Matthew D. Cate, David M. Nichols, Kevin P. Weigl, Bernhard H. Dewan, Puneet Clinical validation of an open-access SARS-COV-2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays |
title | Clinical validation of an open-access SARS-COV-2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays |
title_full | Clinical validation of an open-access SARS-COV-2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays |
title_fullStr | Clinical validation of an open-access SARS-COV-2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical validation of an open-access SARS-COV-2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays |
title_short | Clinical validation of an open-access SARS-COV-2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays |
title_sort | clinical validation of an open-access sars-cov-2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34403456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256352 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bachmanchristinem clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays AT grantbenjamind clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays AT andersoncaitline clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays AT alonzoluisf clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays AT garingspencer clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays AT byrnessama clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays AT riverarafael clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays AT burkotstephen clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays AT ballalexey clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays AT staffordjamesw clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays AT wangwenbo clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays AT banikdipayan clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays AT kellermatthewd clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays AT catedavidm clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays AT nicholskevinp clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays AT weiglbernhardh clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays AT dewanpuneet clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays |