Cargando…

Clinical validation of an open-access SARS-COV-2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays

Rapid tests for SARS-COV-2 infection are important tools for pandemic control, but current rapid tests are based on proprietary designs and reagents. We report clinical validation results of an open-access lateral flow assay (OA-LFA) design using commercially available materials and reagents, along...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bachman, Christine M., Grant, Benjamin D., Anderson, Caitlin E., Alonzo, Luis F., Garing, Spencer, Byrnes, Sam A., Rivera, Rafael, Burkot, Stephen, Ball, Alexey, Stafford, James W., Wang, Wenbo, Banik, Dipayan, Keller, Matthew D., Cate, David M., Nichols, Kevin P., Weigl, Bernhard H., Dewan, Puneet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34403456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256352
_version_ 1783739477569568768
author Bachman, Christine M.
Grant, Benjamin D.
Anderson, Caitlin E.
Alonzo, Luis F.
Garing, Spencer
Byrnes, Sam A.
Rivera, Rafael
Burkot, Stephen
Ball, Alexey
Stafford, James W.
Wang, Wenbo
Banik, Dipayan
Keller, Matthew D.
Cate, David M.
Nichols, Kevin P.
Weigl, Bernhard H.
Dewan, Puneet
author_facet Bachman, Christine M.
Grant, Benjamin D.
Anderson, Caitlin E.
Alonzo, Luis F.
Garing, Spencer
Byrnes, Sam A.
Rivera, Rafael
Burkot, Stephen
Ball, Alexey
Stafford, James W.
Wang, Wenbo
Banik, Dipayan
Keller, Matthew D.
Cate, David M.
Nichols, Kevin P.
Weigl, Bernhard H.
Dewan, Puneet
author_sort Bachman, Christine M.
collection PubMed
description Rapid tests for SARS-COV-2 infection are important tools for pandemic control, but current rapid tests are based on proprietary designs and reagents. We report clinical validation results of an open-access lateral flow assay (OA-LFA) design using commercially available materials and reagents, along with RT-qPCR and commercially available comparators (BinaxNOW® and Sofia®). Adult patients with suspected COVID-19 based on clinical signs and symptoms, and with symptoms ≤7 days duration, underwent anterior nares (AN) sampling for the OA-LFA, Sofia®, BinaxNOW ™, and RT-qPCR, along with nasopharyngeal (NP) RT-qPCR. Results indicate a positive predictive agreement with NP sampling as 69% (60% -78%) OA-LFA, 74% (64% - 82%) Sofia®, and 82% (73% - 88%) BinaxNOW™. The implication for these results is that we provide an open-access LFA design that meets the minimum WHO target product profile for a rapid test, that virtually any diagnostic manufacturer could produce.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8370603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83706032021-08-18 Clinical validation of an open-access SARS-COV-2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays Bachman, Christine M. Grant, Benjamin D. Anderson, Caitlin E. Alonzo, Luis F. Garing, Spencer Byrnes, Sam A. Rivera, Rafael Burkot, Stephen Ball, Alexey Stafford, James W. Wang, Wenbo Banik, Dipayan Keller, Matthew D. Cate, David M. Nichols, Kevin P. Weigl, Bernhard H. Dewan, Puneet PLoS One Research Article Rapid tests for SARS-COV-2 infection are important tools for pandemic control, but current rapid tests are based on proprietary designs and reagents. We report clinical validation results of an open-access lateral flow assay (OA-LFA) design using commercially available materials and reagents, along with RT-qPCR and commercially available comparators (BinaxNOW® and Sofia®). Adult patients with suspected COVID-19 based on clinical signs and symptoms, and with symptoms ≤7 days duration, underwent anterior nares (AN) sampling for the OA-LFA, Sofia®, BinaxNOW ™, and RT-qPCR, along with nasopharyngeal (NP) RT-qPCR. Results indicate a positive predictive agreement with NP sampling as 69% (60% -78%) OA-LFA, 74% (64% - 82%) Sofia®, and 82% (73% - 88%) BinaxNOW™. The implication for these results is that we provide an open-access LFA design that meets the minimum WHO target product profile for a rapid test, that virtually any diagnostic manufacturer could produce. Public Library of Science 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8370603/ /pubmed/34403456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256352 Text en © 2021 Bachman et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bachman, Christine M.
Grant, Benjamin D.
Anderson, Caitlin E.
Alonzo, Luis F.
Garing, Spencer
Byrnes, Sam A.
Rivera, Rafael
Burkot, Stephen
Ball, Alexey
Stafford, James W.
Wang, Wenbo
Banik, Dipayan
Keller, Matthew D.
Cate, David M.
Nichols, Kevin P.
Weigl, Bernhard H.
Dewan, Puneet
Clinical validation of an open-access SARS-COV-2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays
title Clinical validation of an open-access SARS-COV-2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays
title_full Clinical validation of an open-access SARS-COV-2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays
title_fullStr Clinical validation of an open-access SARS-COV-2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays
title_full_unstemmed Clinical validation of an open-access SARS-COV-2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays
title_short Clinical validation of an open-access SARS-COV-2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays
title_sort clinical validation of an open-access sars-cov-2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34403456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256352
work_keys_str_mv AT bachmanchristinem clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays
AT grantbenjamind clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays
AT andersoncaitline clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays
AT alonzoluisf clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays
AT garingspencer clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays
AT byrnessama clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays
AT riverarafael clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays
AT burkotstephen clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays
AT ballalexey clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays
AT staffordjamesw clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays
AT wangwenbo clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays
AT banikdipayan clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays
AT kellermatthewd clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays
AT catedavidm clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays
AT nicholskevinp clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays
AT weiglbernhardh clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays
AT dewanpuneet clinicalvalidationofanopenaccesssarscov2antigendetectionlateralflowassaycomparedtocommerciallyavailableassays