Cargando…
A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers
The predatory nature of a journal is in constant debate because it depends on multiple factors, which keep evolving. The classification of a journal as being predatory, or not, is no longer exclusively associated with its open access status, by inclusion or exclusion on perceived reputable academic...
Autores principales: | Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A., Dunleavy, Daniel J., Moradzadeh, Mina, Eykens, Joshua |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34421155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04118-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
CRediT for authors of articles published in the Journal of the Medical Library Association
por: Alpi, Kristine M., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Progressive and degenerative journals: on the growth and appraisal of knowledge in scholarly publishing
por: Dunleavy, Daniel J.
Publicado: (2022) -
Impact of National Scientific Production in Cardiology on the Rating
of Journals Published in Brazil
por: Moreira, Luiz Felipe P.
Publicado: (2013) -
Paper mills and on-demand publishing: Risks to the integrity of journal indexing and metrics
por: Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A.
Publicado: (2021) -
Giving Proper
CRediT: The Modern Minefield of Scientific
Publishing, Career Advancement, and Interdisciplinary Science
por: Solomon, Gemma C., et al.
Publicado: (2022)