Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults in different clinical cohorts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: The majority of individuals with clinically significant obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are undiagnosed and untreated. A simple screening tool may support risk stratification, identification, and appropriate management of at-risk patients. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernhardt, Lizelle, Brady, Emer M., Freeman, Suzanne C., Polmann, Helena, Réus, Jéssica Conti, Flores-Mir, Carlos, De Luca Canto , Graziela, Robertson, Noelle, Squire, Iain B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34406554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-021-02450-9
_version_ 1783739520897777664
author Bernhardt, Lizelle
Brady, Emer M.
Freeman, Suzanne C.
Polmann, Helena
Réus, Jéssica Conti
Flores-Mir, Carlos
De Luca Canto , Graziela
Robertson, Noelle
Squire, Iain B.
author_facet Bernhardt, Lizelle
Brady, Emer M.
Freeman, Suzanne C.
Polmann, Helena
Réus, Jéssica Conti
Flores-Mir, Carlos
De Luca Canto , Graziela
Robertson, Noelle
Squire, Iain B.
author_sort Bernhardt, Lizelle
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The majority of individuals with clinically significant obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are undiagnosed and untreated. A simple screening tool may support risk stratification, identification, and appropriate management of at-risk patients. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated and compared the accuracy and clinical utility of existing screening questionnaires for identifying OSA in different clinical cohorts. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies assessing the diagnostic value of OSA screening questionnaires. We identified prospective studies, validated against polysomnography, and published to December 2020 from online databases. To pool the results, we used random effects bivariate binomial meta-analysis. RESULTS: We included 38 studies across three clinical cohorts in the meta-analysis. In the sleep clinic cohort, the Berlin questionnaire’s pooled sensitivity for apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥ 5, ≥ 15, and ≥ 30 was 85%, 84%, and 89%, and pooled specificity was 43%, 30%, and 33%, respectively. The STOP questionnaire’s pooled sensitivity for AHI ≥ 5, ≥ 15, and ≥ 30 was 90%, 90%, and 95%, and pooled specificity was 31%, 29%, and 21%. The pooled sensitivity of the STOP-Bang questionnaire for AHI ≥ 5, ≥ 15, and ≥ 30 was 92%, 95%, and 96%, and pooled specificity was 35%, 27%, and 28%. In the surgical cohort (AHI ≥ 15), the Berlin and STOP-Bang questionnaires’ pooled sensitivity were 76% and 90% and pooled specificity 47% and 27%. CONCLUSION: Among the identified questionnaires, the STOP-Bang questionnaire had the highest sensitivity to detect OSA but lacked specificity. Subgroup analysis considering other at-risk populations was not possible. Our observations are limited by the low certainty level in available data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11325-021-02450-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8370860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83708602021-08-18 Diagnostic accuracy of screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults in different clinical cohorts: a systematic review and meta-analysis Bernhardt, Lizelle Brady, Emer M. Freeman, Suzanne C. Polmann, Helena Réus, Jéssica Conti Flores-Mir, Carlos De Luca Canto , Graziela Robertson, Noelle Squire, Iain B. Sleep Breath Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article PURPOSE: The majority of individuals with clinically significant obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are undiagnosed and untreated. A simple screening tool may support risk stratification, identification, and appropriate management of at-risk patients. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated and compared the accuracy and clinical utility of existing screening questionnaires for identifying OSA in different clinical cohorts. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies assessing the diagnostic value of OSA screening questionnaires. We identified prospective studies, validated against polysomnography, and published to December 2020 from online databases. To pool the results, we used random effects bivariate binomial meta-analysis. RESULTS: We included 38 studies across three clinical cohorts in the meta-analysis. In the sleep clinic cohort, the Berlin questionnaire’s pooled sensitivity for apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥ 5, ≥ 15, and ≥ 30 was 85%, 84%, and 89%, and pooled specificity was 43%, 30%, and 33%, respectively. The STOP questionnaire’s pooled sensitivity for AHI ≥ 5, ≥ 15, and ≥ 30 was 90%, 90%, and 95%, and pooled specificity was 31%, 29%, and 21%. The pooled sensitivity of the STOP-Bang questionnaire for AHI ≥ 5, ≥ 15, and ≥ 30 was 92%, 95%, and 96%, and pooled specificity was 35%, 27%, and 28%. In the surgical cohort (AHI ≥ 15), the Berlin and STOP-Bang questionnaires’ pooled sensitivity were 76% and 90% and pooled specificity 47% and 27%. CONCLUSION: Among the identified questionnaires, the STOP-Bang questionnaire had the highest sensitivity to detect OSA but lacked specificity. Subgroup analysis considering other at-risk populations was not possible. Our observations are limited by the low certainty level in available data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11325-021-02450-9. Springer International Publishing 2021-08-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8370860/ /pubmed/34406554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-021-02450-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article
Bernhardt, Lizelle
Brady, Emer M.
Freeman, Suzanne C.
Polmann, Helena
Réus, Jéssica Conti
Flores-Mir, Carlos
De Luca Canto , Graziela
Robertson, Noelle
Squire, Iain B.
Diagnostic accuracy of screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults in different clinical cohorts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Diagnostic accuracy of screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults in different clinical cohorts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults in different clinical cohorts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults in different clinical cohorts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults in different clinical cohorts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults in different clinical cohorts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults in different clinical cohorts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34406554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-021-02450-9
work_keys_str_mv AT bernhardtlizelle diagnosticaccuracyofscreeningquestionnairesforobstructivesleepapnoeainadultsindifferentclinicalcohortsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bradyemerm diagnosticaccuracyofscreeningquestionnairesforobstructivesleepapnoeainadultsindifferentclinicalcohortsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT freemansuzannec diagnosticaccuracyofscreeningquestionnairesforobstructivesleepapnoeainadultsindifferentclinicalcohortsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT polmannhelena diagnosticaccuracyofscreeningquestionnairesforobstructivesleepapnoeainadultsindifferentclinicalcohortsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT reusjessicaconti diagnosticaccuracyofscreeningquestionnairesforobstructivesleepapnoeainadultsindifferentclinicalcohortsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT floresmircarlos diagnosticaccuracyofscreeningquestionnairesforobstructivesleepapnoeainadultsindifferentclinicalcohortsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT delucacantograziela diagnosticaccuracyofscreeningquestionnairesforobstructivesleepapnoeainadultsindifferentclinicalcohortsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT robertsonnoelle diagnosticaccuracyofscreeningquestionnairesforobstructivesleepapnoeainadultsindifferentclinicalcohortsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT squireiainb diagnosticaccuracyofscreeningquestionnairesforobstructivesleepapnoeainadultsindifferentclinicalcohortsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis