Cargando…

Mesh abdominoplasty for rectus diastasis in women and men

PURPOSE: Meshes clearly have improved outcomes for tissue approximation over suture repairs for incisional hernias. A knowledge gap exists as to the surgical complication rate and post-operative outcomes of a mesh rectus diastasis repair with a narrow well-fixed mesh that simultaneously narrows the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dumanian, G. A., Moradian, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34342745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02461-1
_version_ 1783739540393951232
author Dumanian, G. A.
Moradian, S.
author_facet Dumanian, G. A.
Moradian, S.
author_sort Dumanian, G. A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Meshes clearly have improved outcomes for tissue approximation over suture repairs for incisional hernias. A knowledge gap exists as to the surgical complication rate and post-operative outcomes of a mesh rectus diastasis repair with a narrow well-fixed mesh that simultaneously narrows the rectus muscles and closes the widened linea alba. METHODS: Inclusion criteria for mesh abdominoplasty were patients who (1) underwent a retrorectus planar mesh for repair of rectus diastasis (2) did not have a concurrent incisional hernia and (3) underwent skin tailoring as part of a cosmetic aspect of their care. The primary endpoint was surgical site occurrence (SSO) at any time after surgery as determined with review of their office and hospital medical records. Secondary endpoints included the length and complexity of the return to the operating room for any reason, non-surgical complications, readmission, post-operative recovery, surgical site infection, recurrence/persistence of abdominal wall laxity, and soft tissue revision rates. RESULTS: SSO rate was 0% for the 56 patients who underwent this procedure. There were 40 women and 16 men. Superficial infections requiring oral antibiotics were required in three patients. One was a drain site erythema, one was for a superficial stitch abscess, and the third was for a mesh strip knot infection 6 months after the procedure. One patient underwent further tightening of the abdominal wall. Rates of soft tissue revision in the office for improved cosmesis were 23% in women and 6% in men. CONCLUSION: Repair of rectus diastasis with a narrow well-fixed mesh and concurrent skin abdominoplasty is a well-tolerated and reliable procedure with low recurrence and low SSO in the manner described. It is a procedure that works for both female and male pattern rectus diastasis, and has become our procedure of choice for moderate and severe rectus diastasis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10029-021-02461-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8370955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83709552021-08-31 Mesh abdominoplasty for rectus diastasis in women and men Dumanian, G. A. Moradian, S. Hernia Original Article PURPOSE: Meshes clearly have improved outcomes for tissue approximation over suture repairs for incisional hernias. A knowledge gap exists as to the surgical complication rate and post-operative outcomes of a mesh rectus diastasis repair with a narrow well-fixed mesh that simultaneously narrows the rectus muscles and closes the widened linea alba. METHODS: Inclusion criteria for mesh abdominoplasty were patients who (1) underwent a retrorectus planar mesh for repair of rectus diastasis (2) did not have a concurrent incisional hernia and (3) underwent skin tailoring as part of a cosmetic aspect of their care. The primary endpoint was surgical site occurrence (SSO) at any time after surgery as determined with review of their office and hospital medical records. Secondary endpoints included the length and complexity of the return to the operating room for any reason, non-surgical complications, readmission, post-operative recovery, surgical site infection, recurrence/persistence of abdominal wall laxity, and soft tissue revision rates. RESULTS: SSO rate was 0% for the 56 patients who underwent this procedure. There were 40 women and 16 men. Superficial infections requiring oral antibiotics were required in three patients. One was a drain site erythema, one was for a superficial stitch abscess, and the third was for a mesh strip knot infection 6 months after the procedure. One patient underwent further tightening of the abdominal wall. Rates of soft tissue revision in the office for improved cosmesis were 23% in women and 6% in men. CONCLUSION: Repair of rectus diastasis with a narrow well-fixed mesh and concurrent skin abdominoplasty is a well-tolerated and reliable procedure with low recurrence and low SSO in the manner described. It is a procedure that works for both female and male pattern rectus diastasis, and has become our procedure of choice for moderate and severe rectus diastasis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10029-021-02461-1. Springer Paris 2021-08-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8370955/ /pubmed/34342745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02461-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Dumanian, G. A.
Moradian, S.
Mesh abdominoplasty for rectus diastasis in women and men
title Mesh abdominoplasty for rectus diastasis in women and men
title_full Mesh abdominoplasty for rectus diastasis in women and men
title_fullStr Mesh abdominoplasty for rectus diastasis in women and men
title_full_unstemmed Mesh abdominoplasty for rectus diastasis in women and men
title_short Mesh abdominoplasty for rectus diastasis in women and men
title_sort mesh abdominoplasty for rectus diastasis in women and men
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34342745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02461-1
work_keys_str_mv AT dumanianga meshabdominoplastyforrectusdiastasisinwomenandmen
AT moradians meshabdominoplastyforrectusdiastasisinwomenandmen