Cargando…
Evaluation of focus and deep learning methods for automated image grading and factors influencing image quality in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy
Adaptive optics flood illumination ophthalmoscopy (AO-FIO) is an established imaging tool in the investigation of retinal diseases. However, the clinical interpretation of AO-FIO images can be challenging due to varied image quality. Therefore, image quality assessment is essential before interpreta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8371000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34404857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96068-2 |
_version_ | 1783739550763319296 |
---|---|
author | Sampson, Danuta M. Alonso-Caneiro, David Chew, Avenell L. La, Jonathan Roshandel, Danial Wang, Yufei Khan, Jane C. Chelva, Enid Stevenson, Paul G. Chen, Fred K. |
author_facet | Sampson, Danuta M. Alonso-Caneiro, David Chew, Avenell L. La, Jonathan Roshandel, Danial Wang, Yufei Khan, Jane C. Chelva, Enid Stevenson, Paul G. Chen, Fred K. |
author_sort | Sampson, Danuta M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Adaptive optics flood illumination ophthalmoscopy (AO-FIO) is an established imaging tool in the investigation of retinal diseases. However, the clinical interpretation of AO-FIO images can be challenging due to varied image quality. Therefore, image quality assessment is essential before interpretation. An image assessment tool will also assist further work on improving the image quality, either during acquisition or post processing. In this paper, we describe, validate and compare two automated image quality assessment methods; the energy of Laplacian focus operator (LAPE; not commonly used but easily implemented) and convolutional neural network (CNN; effective but more complex approach). We also evaluate the effects of subject age, axial length, refractive error, fixation stability, disease status and retinal location on AO-FIO image quality. Based on analysis of 10,250 images of 50 × 50 μm size, at 41 retinal locations, from 50 subjects we demonstrate that CNN slightly outperforms LAPE in image quality assessment. CNN achieves accuracy of 89%, whereas LAPE metric achieves 73% and 80% (for a linear regression and random forest multiclass classifier methods, respectively) compared to ground truth. Furthermore, the retinal location, age and disease are factors that can influence the likelihood of poor image quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8371000 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83710002021-08-19 Evaluation of focus and deep learning methods for automated image grading and factors influencing image quality in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy Sampson, Danuta M. Alonso-Caneiro, David Chew, Avenell L. La, Jonathan Roshandel, Danial Wang, Yufei Khan, Jane C. Chelva, Enid Stevenson, Paul G. Chen, Fred K. Sci Rep Article Adaptive optics flood illumination ophthalmoscopy (AO-FIO) is an established imaging tool in the investigation of retinal diseases. However, the clinical interpretation of AO-FIO images can be challenging due to varied image quality. Therefore, image quality assessment is essential before interpretation. An image assessment tool will also assist further work on improving the image quality, either during acquisition or post processing. In this paper, we describe, validate and compare two automated image quality assessment methods; the energy of Laplacian focus operator (LAPE; not commonly used but easily implemented) and convolutional neural network (CNN; effective but more complex approach). We also evaluate the effects of subject age, axial length, refractive error, fixation stability, disease status and retinal location on AO-FIO image quality. Based on analysis of 10,250 images of 50 × 50 μm size, at 41 retinal locations, from 50 subjects we demonstrate that CNN slightly outperforms LAPE in image quality assessment. CNN achieves accuracy of 89%, whereas LAPE metric achieves 73% and 80% (for a linear regression and random forest multiclass classifier methods, respectively) compared to ground truth. Furthermore, the retinal location, age and disease are factors that can influence the likelihood of poor image quality. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8371000/ /pubmed/34404857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96068-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Sampson, Danuta M. Alonso-Caneiro, David Chew, Avenell L. La, Jonathan Roshandel, Danial Wang, Yufei Khan, Jane C. Chelva, Enid Stevenson, Paul G. Chen, Fred K. Evaluation of focus and deep learning methods for automated image grading and factors influencing image quality in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy |
title | Evaluation of focus and deep learning methods for automated image grading and factors influencing image quality in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy |
title_full | Evaluation of focus and deep learning methods for automated image grading and factors influencing image quality in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of focus and deep learning methods for automated image grading and factors influencing image quality in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of focus and deep learning methods for automated image grading and factors influencing image quality in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy |
title_short | Evaluation of focus and deep learning methods for automated image grading and factors influencing image quality in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy |
title_sort | evaluation of focus and deep learning methods for automated image grading and factors influencing image quality in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8371000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34404857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96068-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sampsondanutam evaluationoffocusanddeeplearningmethodsforautomatedimagegradingandfactorsinfluencingimagequalityinadaptiveopticsophthalmoscopy AT alonsocaneirodavid evaluationoffocusanddeeplearningmethodsforautomatedimagegradingandfactorsinfluencingimagequalityinadaptiveopticsophthalmoscopy AT chewavenelll evaluationoffocusanddeeplearningmethodsforautomatedimagegradingandfactorsinfluencingimagequalityinadaptiveopticsophthalmoscopy AT lajonathan evaluationoffocusanddeeplearningmethodsforautomatedimagegradingandfactorsinfluencingimagequalityinadaptiveopticsophthalmoscopy AT roshandeldanial evaluationoffocusanddeeplearningmethodsforautomatedimagegradingandfactorsinfluencingimagequalityinadaptiveopticsophthalmoscopy AT wangyufei evaluationoffocusanddeeplearningmethodsforautomatedimagegradingandfactorsinfluencingimagequalityinadaptiveopticsophthalmoscopy AT khanjanec evaluationoffocusanddeeplearningmethodsforautomatedimagegradingandfactorsinfluencingimagequalityinadaptiveopticsophthalmoscopy AT chelvaenid evaluationoffocusanddeeplearningmethodsforautomatedimagegradingandfactorsinfluencingimagequalityinadaptiveopticsophthalmoscopy AT stevensonpaulg evaluationoffocusanddeeplearningmethodsforautomatedimagegradingandfactorsinfluencingimagequalityinadaptiveopticsophthalmoscopy AT chenfredk evaluationoffocusanddeeplearningmethodsforautomatedimagegradingandfactorsinfluencingimagequalityinadaptiveopticsophthalmoscopy |