Cargando…

Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study

This study aimed to perform a comparative analysis of postoperative results between lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) treated with oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) from the Chiba spine surgery registry database. Sixty-five patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takaoka, Hiromitsu, Inage, Kazuhide, Eguchi, Yawara, Shiga, Yasuhiro, Furuya, Takeo, Maki, Satoshi, Aoki, Yasuchika, Inoue, Masahiro, Fujiyoshi, Takayuki, Miyamoto, Takuya, Noguchi, Yuji, Nakamura, Shinichiro, Kinoshita, Tomoaki, Kamada, Takahito, Takahashi, Hiroshi, Saito, Junya, Norimoto, Masaki, Kotani, Toshiaki, Sakuma, Tsuyoshi, Iijima, Yasushi, Ishikawa, Tetsuhiro, Umimura, Tomotaka, Ohta, Mitsutoshi, Suzuki-Narita, Miyako, Enomoto, Keigo, Sato, Takashi, Sato, Masashi, Suzuki, Masahiro, Hozumi, Takashi, Kim, Geundong, Mizuki, Norichika, Tsuchiya, Ryuto, Otagiri, Takuma, Mukaihata, Tomohito, Hishiya, Takahisa, Ohtori, Seiji, Orita, Sumihisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8371103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34404826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95774-1
_version_ 1783739570031951872
author Takaoka, Hiromitsu
Inage, Kazuhide
Eguchi, Yawara
Shiga, Yasuhiro
Furuya, Takeo
Maki, Satoshi
Aoki, Yasuchika
Inoue, Masahiro
Fujiyoshi, Takayuki
Miyamoto, Takuya
Noguchi, Yuji
Nakamura, Shinichiro
Kinoshita, Tomoaki
Kamada, Takahito
Takahashi, Hiroshi
Saito, Junya
Norimoto, Masaki
Kotani, Toshiaki
Sakuma, Tsuyoshi
Iijima, Yasushi
Ishikawa, Tetsuhiro
Umimura, Tomotaka
Ohta, Mitsutoshi
Suzuki-Narita, Miyako
Enomoto, Keigo
Sato, Takashi
Sato, Masashi
Suzuki, Masahiro
Hozumi, Takashi
Kim, Geundong
Mizuki, Norichika
Tsuchiya, Ryuto
Otagiri, Takuma
Mukaihata, Tomohito
Hishiya, Takahisa
Ohtori, Seiji
Orita, Sumihisa
author_facet Takaoka, Hiromitsu
Inage, Kazuhide
Eguchi, Yawara
Shiga, Yasuhiro
Furuya, Takeo
Maki, Satoshi
Aoki, Yasuchika
Inoue, Masahiro
Fujiyoshi, Takayuki
Miyamoto, Takuya
Noguchi, Yuji
Nakamura, Shinichiro
Kinoshita, Tomoaki
Kamada, Takahito
Takahashi, Hiroshi
Saito, Junya
Norimoto, Masaki
Kotani, Toshiaki
Sakuma, Tsuyoshi
Iijima, Yasushi
Ishikawa, Tetsuhiro
Umimura, Tomotaka
Ohta, Mitsutoshi
Suzuki-Narita, Miyako
Enomoto, Keigo
Sato, Takashi
Sato, Masashi
Suzuki, Masahiro
Hozumi, Takashi
Kim, Geundong
Mizuki, Norichika
Tsuchiya, Ryuto
Otagiri, Takuma
Mukaihata, Tomohito
Hishiya, Takahisa
Ohtori, Seiji
Orita, Sumihisa
author_sort Takaoka, Hiromitsu
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to perform a comparative analysis of postoperative results between lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) treated with oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) from the Chiba spine surgery registry database. Sixty-five patients who underwent single-level OLIF (O group) for LDS with ≥ 3 years’ follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The control group comprised 78 patients who underwent single-level TLIF (T group). The analyzed variables included global alignment, radiological parameters of fused segments, asymptomatic and symptomatic ASD incidence, clinical outcomes at 3 years postoperatively using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire data, visual analogue scale scores for low back pain, lower extremity pain, and lower extremity numbness. There was no significant change in global alignment between the two groups. The rate of improvement in anterior intervertebral disc height was not significantly different between the groups at 1-month postoperatively. However, at the final evaluation, the anterior intervertebral disc height and incidence of asymptomatic ASD were significantly higher in the O group. There was no significant difference in symptomatic ASD, reoperation cases, or clinical results between groups. Thus, single-level OLIF can maintain the corrected disc height, but as it has no effect on global alignment, its benefit is limited.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8371103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83711032021-08-19 Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study Takaoka, Hiromitsu Inage, Kazuhide Eguchi, Yawara Shiga, Yasuhiro Furuya, Takeo Maki, Satoshi Aoki, Yasuchika Inoue, Masahiro Fujiyoshi, Takayuki Miyamoto, Takuya Noguchi, Yuji Nakamura, Shinichiro Kinoshita, Tomoaki Kamada, Takahito Takahashi, Hiroshi Saito, Junya Norimoto, Masaki Kotani, Toshiaki Sakuma, Tsuyoshi Iijima, Yasushi Ishikawa, Tetsuhiro Umimura, Tomotaka Ohta, Mitsutoshi Suzuki-Narita, Miyako Enomoto, Keigo Sato, Takashi Sato, Masashi Suzuki, Masahiro Hozumi, Takashi Kim, Geundong Mizuki, Norichika Tsuchiya, Ryuto Otagiri, Takuma Mukaihata, Tomohito Hishiya, Takahisa Ohtori, Seiji Orita, Sumihisa Sci Rep Article This study aimed to perform a comparative analysis of postoperative results between lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) treated with oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) from the Chiba spine surgery registry database. Sixty-five patients who underwent single-level OLIF (O group) for LDS with ≥ 3 years’ follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The control group comprised 78 patients who underwent single-level TLIF (T group). The analyzed variables included global alignment, radiological parameters of fused segments, asymptomatic and symptomatic ASD incidence, clinical outcomes at 3 years postoperatively using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire data, visual analogue scale scores for low back pain, lower extremity pain, and lower extremity numbness. There was no significant change in global alignment between the two groups. The rate of improvement in anterior intervertebral disc height was not significantly different between the groups at 1-month postoperatively. However, at the final evaluation, the anterior intervertebral disc height and incidence of asymptomatic ASD were significantly higher in the O group. There was no significant difference in symptomatic ASD, reoperation cases, or clinical results between groups. Thus, single-level OLIF can maintain the corrected disc height, but as it has no effect on global alignment, its benefit is limited. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8371103/ /pubmed/34404826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95774-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Takaoka, Hiromitsu
Inage, Kazuhide
Eguchi, Yawara
Shiga, Yasuhiro
Furuya, Takeo
Maki, Satoshi
Aoki, Yasuchika
Inoue, Masahiro
Fujiyoshi, Takayuki
Miyamoto, Takuya
Noguchi, Yuji
Nakamura, Shinichiro
Kinoshita, Tomoaki
Kamada, Takahito
Takahashi, Hiroshi
Saito, Junya
Norimoto, Masaki
Kotani, Toshiaki
Sakuma, Tsuyoshi
Iijima, Yasushi
Ishikawa, Tetsuhiro
Umimura, Tomotaka
Ohta, Mitsutoshi
Suzuki-Narita, Miyako
Enomoto, Keigo
Sato, Takashi
Sato, Masashi
Suzuki, Masahiro
Hozumi, Takashi
Kim, Geundong
Mizuki, Norichika
Tsuchiya, Ryuto
Otagiri, Takuma
Mukaihata, Tomohito
Hishiya, Takahisa
Ohtori, Seiji
Orita, Sumihisa
Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
title Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
title_full Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
title_fullStr Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
title_short Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
title_sort comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8371103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34404826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95774-1
work_keys_str_mv AT takaokahiromitsu comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT inagekazuhide comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT eguchiyawara comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT shigayasuhiro comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT furuyatakeo comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT makisatoshi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT aokiyasuchika comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT inouemasahiro comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT fujiyoshitakayuki comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT miyamototakuya comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT noguchiyuji comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT nakamurashinichiro comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT kinoshitatomoaki comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT kamadatakahito comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT takahashihiroshi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT saitojunya comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT norimotomasaki comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT kotanitoshiaki comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT sakumatsuyoshi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT iijimayasushi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT ishikawatetsuhiro comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT umimuratomotaka comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT ohtamitsutoshi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT suzukinaritamiyako comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT enomotokeigo comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT satotakashi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT satomasashi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT suzukimasahiro comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT hozumitakashi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT kimgeundong comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT mizukinorichika comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT tsuchiyaryuto comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT otagiritakuma comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT mukaihatatomohito comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT hishiyatakahisa comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT ohtoriseiji comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
AT oritasumihisa comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy