Cargando…
Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
This study aimed to perform a comparative analysis of postoperative results between lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) treated with oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) from the Chiba spine surgery registry database. Sixty-five patients w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8371103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34404826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95774-1 |
_version_ | 1783739570031951872 |
---|---|
author | Takaoka, Hiromitsu Inage, Kazuhide Eguchi, Yawara Shiga, Yasuhiro Furuya, Takeo Maki, Satoshi Aoki, Yasuchika Inoue, Masahiro Fujiyoshi, Takayuki Miyamoto, Takuya Noguchi, Yuji Nakamura, Shinichiro Kinoshita, Tomoaki Kamada, Takahito Takahashi, Hiroshi Saito, Junya Norimoto, Masaki Kotani, Toshiaki Sakuma, Tsuyoshi Iijima, Yasushi Ishikawa, Tetsuhiro Umimura, Tomotaka Ohta, Mitsutoshi Suzuki-Narita, Miyako Enomoto, Keigo Sato, Takashi Sato, Masashi Suzuki, Masahiro Hozumi, Takashi Kim, Geundong Mizuki, Norichika Tsuchiya, Ryuto Otagiri, Takuma Mukaihata, Tomohito Hishiya, Takahisa Ohtori, Seiji Orita, Sumihisa |
author_facet | Takaoka, Hiromitsu Inage, Kazuhide Eguchi, Yawara Shiga, Yasuhiro Furuya, Takeo Maki, Satoshi Aoki, Yasuchika Inoue, Masahiro Fujiyoshi, Takayuki Miyamoto, Takuya Noguchi, Yuji Nakamura, Shinichiro Kinoshita, Tomoaki Kamada, Takahito Takahashi, Hiroshi Saito, Junya Norimoto, Masaki Kotani, Toshiaki Sakuma, Tsuyoshi Iijima, Yasushi Ishikawa, Tetsuhiro Umimura, Tomotaka Ohta, Mitsutoshi Suzuki-Narita, Miyako Enomoto, Keigo Sato, Takashi Sato, Masashi Suzuki, Masahiro Hozumi, Takashi Kim, Geundong Mizuki, Norichika Tsuchiya, Ryuto Otagiri, Takuma Mukaihata, Tomohito Hishiya, Takahisa Ohtori, Seiji Orita, Sumihisa |
author_sort | Takaoka, Hiromitsu |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to perform a comparative analysis of postoperative results between lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) treated with oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) from the Chiba spine surgery registry database. Sixty-five patients who underwent single-level OLIF (O group) for LDS with ≥ 3 years’ follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The control group comprised 78 patients who underwent single-level TLIF (T group). The analyzed variables included global alignment, radiological parameters of fused segments, asymptomatic and symptomatic ASD incidence, clinical outcomes at 3 years postoperatively using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire data, visual analogue scale scores for low back pain, lower extremity pain, and lower extremity numbness. There was no significant change in global alignment between the two groups. The rate of improvement in anterior intervertebral disc height was not significantly different between the groups at 1-month postoperatively. However, at the final evaluation, the anterior intervertebral disc height and incidence of asymptomatic ASD were significantly higher in the O group. There was no significant difference in symptomatic ASD, reoperation cases, or clinical results between groups. Thus, single-level OLIF can maintain the corrected disc height, but as it has no effect on global alignment, its benefit is limited. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8371103 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83711032021-08-19 Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study Takaoka, Hiromitsu Inage, Kazuhide Eguchi, Yawara Shiga, Yasuhiro Furuya, Takeo Maki, Satoshi Aoki, Yasuchika Inoue, Masahiro Fujiyoshi, Takayuki Miyamoto, Takuya Noguchi, Yuji Nakamura, Shinichiro Kinoshita, Tomoaki Kamada, Takahito Takahashi, Hiroshi Saito, Junya Norimoto, Masaki Kotani, Toshiaki Sakuma, Tsuyoshi Iijima, Yasushi Ishikawa, Tetsuhiro Umimura, Tomotaka Ohta, Mitsutoshi Suzuki-Narita, Miyako Enomoto, Keigo Sato, Takashi Sato, Masashi Suzuki, Masahiro Hozumi, Takashi Kim, Geundong Mizuki, Norichika Tsuchiya, Ryuto Otagiri, Takuma Mukaihata, Tomohito Hishiya, Takahisa Ohtori, Seiji Orita, Sumihisa Sci Rep Article This study aimed to perform a comparative analysis of postoperative results between lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) treated with oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) from the Chiba spine surgery registry database. Sixty-five patients who underwent single-level OLIF (O group) for LDS with ≥ 3 years’ follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The control group comprised 78 patients who underwent single-level TLIF (T group). The analyzed variables included global alignment, radiological parameters of fused segments, asymptomatic and symptomatic ASD incidence, clinical outcomes at 3 years postoperatively using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire data, visual analogue scale scores for low back pain, lower extremity pain, and lower extremity numbness. There was no significant change in global alignment between the two groups. The rate of improvement in anterior intervertebral disc height was not significantly different between the groups at 1-month postoperatively. However, at the final evaluation, the anterior intervertebral disc height and incidence of asymptomatic ASD were significantly higher in the O group. There was no significant difference in symptomatic ASD, reoperation cases, or clinical results between groups. Thus, single-level OLIF can maintain the corrected disc height, but as it has no effect on global alignment, its benefit is limited. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8371103/ /pubmed/34404826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95774-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Takaoka, Hiromitsu Inage, Kazuhide Eguchi, Yawara Shiga, Yasuhiro Furuya, Takeo Maki, Satoshi Aoki, Yasuchika Inoue, Masahiro Fujiyoshi, Takayuki Miyamoto, Takuya Noguchi, Yuji Nakamura, Shinichiro Kinoshita, Tomoaki Kamada, Takahito Takahashi, Hiroshi Saito, Junya Norimoto, Masaki Kotani, Toshiaki Sakuma, Tsuyoshi Iijima, Yasushi Ishikawa, Tetsuhiro Umimura, Tomotaka Ohta, Mitsutoshi Suzuki-Narita, Miyako Enomoto, Keigo Sato, Takashi Sato, Masashi Suzuki, Masahiro Hozumi, Takashi Kim, Geundong Mizuki, Norichika Tsuchiya, Ryuto Otagiri, Takuma Mukaihata, Tomohito Hishiya, Takahisa Ohtori, Seiji Orita, Sumihisa Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study |
title | Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study |
title_full | Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study |
title_fullStr | Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study |
title_short | Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study |
title_sort | comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8371103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34404826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95774-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takaokahiromitsu comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT inagekazuhide comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT eguchiyawara comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT shigayasuhiro comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT furuyatakeo comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT makisatoshi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT aokiyasuchika comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT inouemasahiro comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT fujiyoshitakayuki comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT miyamototakuya comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT noguchiyuji comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT nakamurashinichiro comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT kinoshitatomoaki comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT kamadatakahito comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT takahashihiroshi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT saitojunya comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT norimotomasaki comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT kotanitoshiaki comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT sakumatsuyoshi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT iijimayasushi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT ishikawatetsuhiro comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT umimuratomotaka comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT ohtamitsutoshi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT suzukinaritamiyako comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT enomotokeigo comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT satotakashi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT satomasashi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT suzukimasahiro comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT hozumitakashi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT kimgeundong comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT mizukinorichika comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT tsuchiyaryuto comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT otagiritakuma comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT mukaihatatomohito comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT hishiyatakahisa comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT ohtoriseiji comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT oritasumihisa comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy |