Cargando…
Jays are sensitive to cognitive illusions
Jays hide food caches, steal them from conspecifics and use tactics to minimize cache theft. Jays are sensitive to the content of their own caches, retrieving items depending on their preferences and the perishability of the cached item. Whether jays impose the same content sensitivity when they ste...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8371373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34457330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.202358 |
_version_ | 1783739627602968576 |
---|---|
author | Schnell, Alexandra K. Loconsole, Maria Garcia-Pelegrin, Elias Wilkins, Clive Clayton, Nicola S. |
author_facet | Schnell, Alexandra K. Loconsole, Maria Garcia-Pelegrin, Elias Wilkins, Clive Clayton, Nicola S. |
author_sort | Schnell, Alexandra K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Jays hide food caches, steal them from conspecifics and use tactics to minimize cache theft. Jays are sensitive to the content of their own caches, retrieving items depending on their preferences and the perishability of the cached item. Whether jays impose the same content sensitivity when they steal caches is less clear. We adapted the ‘cups-and-balls’ magic routine, creating a cognitive illusion to test whether jays are sensitive to the (i) content of hidden items and (ii) type of displacement. Subjects were presented with two conditions in which hidden food was consistent with their expectations; and two conditions in which food was manipulated to violate their expectations by switching their second preferred food for their preferred food (up-value) or vice versa (de-value). Subjects readily accepted food when it was consistent with their expectations but were more likely to re-inspect the baited cup and alternative cup when their expectations were violated. In the de-value condition, jays exhibited longer latencies to consume the food and often rejected it. Dominant subjects were more likely to reject the food, suggesting that social factors influence their responses to cognitive illusions. Using cognitive illusions offers innovative avenues for investigating the psychological constraints in diverse animal minds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8371373 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83713732021-08-26 Jays are sensitive to cognitive illusions Schnell, Alexandra K. Loconsole, Maria Garcia-Pelegrin, Elias Wilkins, Clive Clayton, Nicola S. R Soc Open Sci Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Jays hide food caches, steal them from conspecifics and use tactics to minimize cache theft. Jays are sensitive to the content of their own caches, retrieving items depending on their preferences and the perishability of the cached item. Whether jays impose the same content sensitivity when they steal caches is less clear. We adapted the ‘cups-and-balls’ magic routine, creating a cognitive illusion to test whether jays are sensitive to the (i) content of hidden items and (ii) type of displacement. Subjects were presented with two conditions in which hidden food was consistent with their expectations; and two conditions in which food was manipulated to violate their expectations by switching their second preferred food for their preferred food (up-value) or vice versa (de-value). Subjects readily accepted food when it was consistent with their expectations but were more likely to re-inspect the baited cup and alternative cup when their expectations were violated. In the de-value condition, jays exhibited longer latencies to consume the food and often rejected it. Dominant subjects were more likely to reject the food, suggesting that social factors influence their responses to cognitive illusions. Using cognitive illusions offers innovative avenues for investigating the psychological constraints in diverse animal minds. The Royal Society 2021-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8371373/ /pubmed/34457330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.202358 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Schnell, Alexandra K. Loconsole, Maria Garcia-Pelegrin, Elias Wilkins, Clive Clayton, Nicola S. Jays are sensitive to cognitive illusions |
title | Jays are sensitive to cognitive illusions |
title_full | Jays are sensitive to cognitive illusions |
title_fullStr | Jays are sensitive to cognitive illusions |
title_full_unstemmed | Jays are sensitive to cognitive illusions |
title_short | Jays are sensitive to cognitive illusions |
title_sort | jays are sensitive to cognitive illusions |
topic | Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8371373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34457330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.202358 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schnellalexandrak jaysaresensitivetocognitiveillusions AT loconsolemaria jaysaresensitivetocognitiveillusions AT garciapelegrinelias jaysaresensitivetocognitiveillusions AT wilkinsclive jaysaresensitivetocognitiveillusions AT claytonnicolas jaysaresensitivetocognitiveillusions |