Cargando…
Tilted platforms: rental housing technology and the rise of urban big data oligopolies
ABSTRACT: This article interprets emerging scholarship on rental housing platforms—particularly the most well-known and used short- and long-term rental housing platforms—and considers how the technological processes connecting both short-term and long-term rentals to the platform economy are transf...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8371600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34423256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42854-021-00024-2 |
_version_ | 1783739676796911616 |
---|---|
author | Boeing, Geoff Besbris, Max Wachsmuth, David Wegmann, Jake |
author_facet | Boeing, Geoff Besbris, Max Wachsmuth, David Wegmann, Jake |
author_sort | Boeing, Geoff |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: This article interprets emerging scholarship on rental housing platforms—particularly the most well-known and used short- and long-term rental housing platforms—and considers how the technological processes connecting both short-term and long-term rentals to the platform economy are transforming cities. It discusses potential policy approaches to more equitably distribute benefits and mitigate harms. We argue that information technology is not value-neutral. While rental housing platforms may empower data analysts and certain market participants, the same cannot be said for all users or society at large. First, user-generated online data frequently reproduce the systematic biases found in traditional sources of housing information. Evidence is growing that the information broadcasting potential of rental housing platforms may increase rather than mitigate sociospatial inequality. Second, technology platforms curate and shape information according to their creators’ own financial and political interests. The question of which data—and people—are hidden or marginalized on these platforms is just as important as the question of which data are available. Finally, important differences in benefits and drawbacks exist between short-term and long-term rental housing platforms, but are underexplored in the literature: this article unpacks these differences and proposes policy recommendations. POLICY AND PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS: As rental housing technologies upend traditional market processes in favor of platform oligopolies, policymakers must reorient these processes toward the public good. Long-term and short-term rental platforms offer different market benefits and drawbacks, but the latter in particular requires proactive regulation to mitigate harm. At a minimum, policymakers must require that short-term rental platforms provide the information necessary for cities to enforce current, let alone new, housing regulations. Practitioners should be cautious inferring market conditions from rental housing platform data, due to difficult-to-measure sampling biases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8371600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83716002021-08-18 Tilted platforms: rental housing technology and the rise of urban big data oligopolies Boeing, Geoff Besbris, Max Wachsmuth, David Wegmann, Jake Urban Transform Perspective ABSTRACT: This article interprets emerging scholarship on rental housing platforms—particularly the most well-known and used short- and long-term rental housing platforms—and considers how the technological processes connecting both short-term and long-term rentals to the platform economy are transforming cities. It discusses potential policy approaches to more equitably distribute benefits and mitigate harms. We argue that information technology is not value-neutral. While rental housing platforms may empower data analysts and certain market participants, the same cannot be said for all users or society at large. First, user-generated online data frequently reproduce the systematic biases found in traditional sources of housing information. Evidence is growing that the information broadcasting potential of rental housing platforms may increase rather than mitigate sociospatial inequality. Second, technology platforms curate and shape information according to their creators’ own financial and political interests. The question of which data—and people—are hidden or marginalized on these platforms is just as important as the question of which data are available. Finally, important differences in benefits and drawbacks exist between short-term and long-term rental housing platforms, but are underexplored in the literature: this article unpacks these differences and proposes policy recommendations. POLICY AND PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS: As rental housing technologies upend traditional market processes in favor of platform oligopolies, policymakers must reorient these processes toward the public good. Long-term and short-term rental platforms offer different market benefits and drawbacks, but the latter in particular requires proactive regulation to mitigate harm. At a minimum, policymakers must require that short-term rental platforms provide the information necessary for cities to enforce current, let alone new, housing regulations. Practitioners should be cautious inferring market conditions from rental housing platform data, due to difficult-to-measure sampling biases. BioMed Central 2021-08-18 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8371600/ /pubmed/34423256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42854-021-00024-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Perspective Boeing, Geoff Besbris, Max Wachsmuth, David Wegmann, Jake Tilted platforms: rental housing technology and the rise of urban big data oligopolies |
title | Tilted platforms: rental housing technology and the rise of urban big data oligopolies |
title_full | Tilted platforms: rental housing technology and the rise of urban big data oligopolies |
title_fullStr | Tilted platforms: rental housing technology and the rise of urban big data oligopolies |
title_full_unstemmed | Tilted platforms: rental housing technology and the rise of urban big data oligopolies |
title_short | Tilted platforms: rental housing technology and the rise of urban big data oligopolies |
title_sort | tilted platforms: rental housing technology and the rise of urban big data oligopolies |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8371600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34423256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42854-021-00024-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boeinggeoff tiltedplatformsrentalhousingtechnologyandtheriseofurbanbigdataoligopolies AT besbrismax tiltedplatformsrentalhousingtechnologyandtheriseofurbanbigdataoligopolies AT wachsmuthdavid tiltedplatformsrentalhousingtechnologyandtheriseofurbanbigdataoligopolies AT wegmannjake tiltedplatformsrentalhousingtechnologyandtheriseofurbanbigdataoligopolies |