Cargando…
Treating through the surge: institutional experience of definitive management of cervical cancer patients at an urban institution during the COVID-19 pandemic
OBJECTIVES: An international consensus panel has defined locally advanced cervical cancers as a high priority malignancy during the COVID-19 pandemic and recommends prompt initiation of definitive treatment and completion of treatment (PMID 32563593). The objective of this study was to study the cli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8372509/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-8258(21)01244-0 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVES: An international consensus panel has defined locally advanced cervical cancers as a high priority malignancy during the COVID-19 pandemic and recommends prompt initiation of definitive treatment and completion of treatment (PMID 32563593). The objective of this study was to study the clinical outcomes of patients (pts) with cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation (CRT) and brachytherapy (BT) at our institution in 2019 (pre-COVID) and in 2020 (peri-COVID). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of pts with FIGO Stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer at our institutions from 1/2019 to 10/2020. Pts received CRT followed by intracavitary brachytherapy (IC) with two operative insertions one week apart, or interstitial (IS) BT with one operative insertion. BT treatment was planned using image-guided CT or MR delineation. Pre-COVID was defined by initiation of CRT between 1/2019-12/2019, and peri-COVID was defined by initiation between 1/2020-10/2020. Process changes peri-COVID included limited on-site staff (e.g., minimal OR staff, no trainees, remote physics team), universal implementation of COVID-19 testing prior to surgery, and CT instead of MR-delineation based treatment. Outcomes of interest were time to treatment initiation and completion and differences in treatment planning modality or dosimetry. Fisher's exact and Mann Whitney U tests were used with significance p<0.05. RESULTS: Thirty pts were included, with 18 patients undergoing treatment pre-COVID and 12 peri-COVID. The median age at diagnosis pre-COVID was 57.7 (range 23-77) and for peri-COVID, 45.5 (range 28-62, p=0.06). There were no differences in non-English speaking pts (44% vs 59%, p=0.71) or uninsured pts (11% vs 33%, p=0.184) between the two cohorts. Median time to initiation of treatment from biopsy diagnosis was 52 days (range 13-209) in 2019 and for peri-COVID, 55.5 (range 20-173, p=0.71). During COVID, three pts had delayed initiation to treatment >100 days: two related to fertility and one due to fear of COVID-19. For this pt, tumor size progressed from 2.3cm to 4.2 cm maximal dimension. One pt treated in 2020 tested positive following treatment and did not require hospital admission. All pts completed CRT with RT: 24 pts pelvic RT (45 Gy), 3 pelvic and para-aortic RT (45 Gy with 57.5 Gy concomitant boost to nodes), 8 pts pelvic RT (45Gy) with sequential parametrial boost (50.4-59.4 Gy) using IMRT with no dose differences between pre and peri-COVID (Table 1). No pts required treatment breaks and the median overall treatment time was 50 days (range 31-85) in 2019 vs 50 days (range 43-63) in 2020 (p=0.710). [Figure: see text] CONCLUSIONS: Despite the significant burden of the COVID-19 pandemic on our health care system, all cervical cancer pts receiving CRT met standard of care including CRT and BT within the recommended time frame with no significant differences in treatment parameters pre- and peri-COVID. |
---|