Cargando…

Enrollment, retention, and strategies for including disadvantaged populations in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND: Many randomized controlled trials fail to reach their target sample size. When coupled with the omission and underrepresentation of disadvantaged groups in randomized controlled trials, many trials fail to obtain data that accurately represents the true diversity of their target populati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LaPlante, Abigail, Yen, Renata W., Isaacs, Talia, Crocker, Joanna, Demjen, Zsofia, Schubbe, Danielle, Kennedy, Alice M., Engel, Jaclyn, O’Brien, Nancy, Richters, Carla, Durand, Marie-Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8372683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34407862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01790-7
_version_ 1783739828635959296
author LaPlante, Abigail
Yen, Renata W.
Isaacs, Talia
Crocker, Joanna
Demjen, Zsofia
Schubbe, Danielle
Kennedy, Alice M.
Engel, Jaclyn
O’Brien, Nancy
Richters, Carla
Durand, Marie-Anne
author_facet LaPlante, Abigail
Yen, Renata W.
Isaacs, Talia
Crocker, Joanna
Demjen, Zsofia
Schubbe, Danielle
Kennedy, Alice M.
Engel, Jaclyn
O’Brien, Nancy
Richters, Carla
Durand, Marie-Anne
author_sort LaPlante, Abigail
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many randomized controlled trials fail to reach their target sample size. When coupled with the omission and underrepresentation of disadvantaged groups in randomized controlled trials, many trials fail to obtain data that accurately represents the true diversity of their target population. Policies and practices have been implemented to increase representation of disadvantaged groups in many randomized controlled trials, with some trials specifically targeting such groups. To our knowledge, no systematic review has quantified the enrollment metrics and effectiveness of inclusion and retention strategies in randomized controlled trials focused on disadvantaged populations specifically. METHODS: We will conduct a systematic search across EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL as well as grey literature, conference proceedings, research monographs, and Google Scholar from inception onwards. We will include randomized controlled trials where at least 50% of enrolled participants are considered to be disadvantaged, as per the RCT authors’ definition and in line with our inclusion criteria. Two independent researchers per article will conduct preliminary title and abstract screening, subsequent full text review, and data extraction for the selected trials, with a third reviewer available to resolve conflicts. We will assess the quality of all included studies using specific criteria regarding data reporting, external validity, and internal validity. We will combine all selected studies and conduct a narrative synthesis to assess enrollment metrics. If there is sufficient homogeneity and sufficient trials comparing recruitment strategies within disadvantaged populations, we will conduct a random effects meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies designed to maximize the inclusion of disadvantaged populations in randomized controlled trials. DISCUSSION: The findings of this systematic review will establish baseline recruitment and enrollment metrics of trials targeting disadvantaged populations to elucidate the scope of the challenge of recruiting such populations. We hope that our findings will promote future research on the distinct barriers that may prevent disadvantaged populations from participating in health intervention research, will encourage more trials exploring effective, tailored recruitment strategies, and will establish a foundation to track future progress in the recruitment of disadvantaged populations. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: PROSPERO ID: CRD42020152814 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01790-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8372683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83726832021-08-19 Enrollment, retention, and strategies for including disadvantaged populations in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review protocol LaPlante, Abigail Yen, Renata W. Isaacs, Talia Crocker, Joanna Demjen, Zsofia Schubbe, Danielle Kennedy, Alice M. Engel, Jaclyn O’Brien, Nancy Richters, Carla Durand, Marie-Anne Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Many randomized controlled trials fail to reach their target sample size. When coupled with the omission and underrepresentation of disadvantaged groups in randomized controlled trials, many trials fail to obtain data that accurately represents the true diversity of their target population. Policies and practices have been implemented to increase representation of disadvantaged groups in many randomized controlled trials, with some trials specifically targeting such groups. To our knowledge, no systematic review has quantified the enrollment metrics and effectiveness of inclusion and retention strategies in randomized controlled trials focused on disadvantaged populations specifically. METHODS: We will conduct a systematic search across EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL as well as grey literature, conference proceedings, research monographs, and Google Scholar from inception onwards. We will include randomized controlled trials where at least 50% of enrolled participants are considered to be disadvantaged, as per the RCT authors’ definition and in line with our inclusion criteria. Two independent researchers per article will conduct preliminary title and abstract screening, subsequent full text review, and data extraction for the selected trials, with a third reviewer available to resolve conflicts. We will assess the quality of all included studies using specific criteria regarding data reporting, external validity, and internal validity. We will combine all selected studies and conduct a narrative synthesis to assess enrollment metrics. If there is sufficient homogeneity and sufficient trials comparing recruitment strategies within disadvantaged populations, we will conduct a random effects meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies designed to maximize the inclusion of disadvantaged populations in randomized controlled trials. DISCUSSION: The findings of this systematic review will establish baseline recruitment and enrollment metrics of trials targeting disadvantaged populations to elucidate the scope of the challenge of recruiting such populations. We hope that our findings will promote future research on the distinct barriers that may prevent disadvantaged populations from participating in health intervention research, will encourage more trials exploring effective, tailored recruitment strategies, and will establish a foundation to track future progress in the recruitment of disadvantaged populations. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: PROSPERO ID: CRD42020152814 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01790-7. BioMed Central 2021-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8372683/ /pubmed/34407862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01790-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Protocol
LaPlante, Abigail
Yen, Renata W.
Isaacs, Talia
Crocker, Joanna
Demjen, Zsofia
Schubbe, Danielle
Kennedy, Alice M.
Engel, Jaclyn
O’Brien, Nancy
Richters, Carla
Durand, Marie-Anne
Enrollment, retention, and strategies for including disadvantaged populations in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review protocol
title Enrollment, retention, and strategies for including disadvantaged populations in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review protocol
title_full Enrollment, retention, and strategies for including disadvantaged populations in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Enrollment, retention, and strategies for including disadvantaged populations in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Enrollment, retention, and strategies for including disadvantaged populations in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review protocol
title_short Enrollment, retention, and strategies for including disadvantaged populations in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review protocol
title_sort enrollment, retention, and strategies for including disadvantaged populations in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8372683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34407862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01790-7
work_keys_str_mv AT laplanteabigail enrollmentretentionandstrategiesforincludingdisadvantagedpopulationsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT yenrenataw enrollmentretentionandstrategiesforincludingdisadvantagedpopulationsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT isaacstalia enrollmentretentionandstrategiesforincludingdisadvantagedpopulationsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT crockerjoanna enrollmentretentionandstrategiesforincludingdisadvantagedpopulationsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT demjenzsofia enrollmentretentionandstrategiesforincludingdisadvantagedpopulationsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT schubbedanielle enrollmentretentionandstrategiesforincludingdisadvantagedpopulationsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT kennedyalicem enrollmentretentionandstrategiesforincludingdisadvantagedpopulationsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT engeljaclyn enrollmentretentionandstrategiesforincludingdisadvantagedpopulationsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT obriennancy enrollmentretentionandstrategiesforincludingdisadvantagedpopulationsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT richterscarla enrollmentretentionandstrategiesforincludingdisadvantagedpopulationsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT durandmarieanne enrollmentretentionandstrategiesforincludingdisadvantagedpopulationsinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewprotocol