Cargando…

Perceptions of a short animated film on adverse childhood experiences: a mixed methods evaluation

OBJECTIVES: An evaluation of a short animated film on adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) to explore attitudes and sentiment towards the film including, for a subsample of professionals, associations between attitudes and personal experience of ACEs. DESIGN: Mixed-method exploratory design. SETTING...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ford, Kat, Bellis, Mark A, Isherwood, Kate R, Hughes, Karen E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8372873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34404714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050398
_version_ 1783739844064706560
author Ford, Kat
Bellis, Mark A
Isherwood, Kate R
Hughes, Karen E
author_facet Ford, Kat
Bellis, Mark A
Isherwood, Kate R
Hughes, Karen E
author_sort Ford, Kat
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: An evaluation of a short animated film on adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) to explore attitudes and sentiment towards the film including, for a subsample of professionals, associations between attitudes and personal experience of ACEs. DESIGN: Mixed-method exploratory design. SETTING: Professionals and the general public. PARTICIPANTS: A short online survey with 239 professionals. Interaction and user sentiment towards with the film on social media (Twitter, YouTube). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Survey: participants’ attitudes towards the film including feelings invoked, learning gained and ACE count prevalence. Twitter user and YouTube viewer sentiment (positive, negative or neutral) and interaction (likes, retweets or comments) with the film. RESULTS: Attitudes to the film were positive: 94.1% and 93.7%, respectively, agreed that it provided a helpful explanation of ACEs and trusted that the film was credible. Of those who reported ACE exposure, 88.9% agreed that those with ACEs would benefit from watching the film. Despite 50.6% reporting that the film had made them feel sad or upset, the majority (66.4%) reported they found the film hopeful or encouraging. Across 358 publicly available tweets from 313 users, 39.1% of tweets expressed positive sentiment, with only 1.4% negative (59.5% neutral). However, there was no association between tweet sentiment and interaction. Thirteen YouTube versions of the film received 171 812 views, 97.3% (n=889/914) ratings were positive (ie, ‘thumbs up’). CONCLUSIONS: Despite being emotionally arousing, many professionals reflected positive impacts of the film including a perceived increased ability to discuss ACEs. Public sentiment demonstrated a positive reaction to and acceptability of the film. Understanding the professional and public response to materials developed to increase ACE awareness, such as the film explored here, is important given the growing number of international movements which seek to increase ACE awareness, prevent ACEs and mitigate their lifelong negative effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8372873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83728732021-09-02 Perceptions of a short animated film on adverse childhood experiences: a mixed methods evaluation Ford, Kat Bellis, Mark A Isherwood, Kate R Hughes, Karen E BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: An evaluation of a short animated film on adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) to explore attitudes and sentiment towards the film including, for a subsample of professionals, associations between attitudes and personal experience of ACEs. DESIGN: Mixed-method exploratory design. SETTING: Professionals and the general public. PARTICIPANTS: A short online survey with 239 professionals. Interaction and user sentiment towards with the film on social media (Twitter, YouTube). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Survey: participants’ attitudes towards the film including feelings invoked, learning gained and ACE count prevalence. Twitter user and YouTube viewer sentiment (positive, negative or neutral) and interaction (likes, retweets or comments) with the film. RESULTS: Attitudes to the film were positive: 94.1% and 93.7%, respectively, agreed that it provided a helpful explanation of ACEs and trusted that the film was credible. Of those who reported ACE exposure, 88.9% agreed that those with ACEs would benefit from watching the film. Despite 50.6% reporting that the film had made them feel sad or upset, the majority (66.4%) reported they found the film hopeful or encouraging. Across 358 publicly available tweets from 313 users, 39.1% of tweets expressed positive sentiment, with only 1.4% negative (59.5% neutral). However, there was no association between tweet sentiment and interaction. Thirteen YouTube versions of the film received 171 812 views, 97.3% (n=889/914) ratings were positive (ie, ‘thumbs up’). CONCLUSIONS: Despite being emotionally arousing, many professionals reflected positive impacts of the film including a perceived increased ability to discuss ACEs. Public sentiment demonstrated a positive reaction to and acceptability of the film. Understanding the professional and public response to materials developed to increase ACE awareness, such as the film explored here, is important given the growing number of international movements which seek to increase ACE awareness, prevent ACEs and mitigate their lifelong negative effects. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8372873/ /pubmed/34404714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050398 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Ford, Kat
Bellis, Mark A
Isherwood, Kate R
Hughes, Karen E
Perceptions of a short animated film on adverse childhood experiences: a mixed methods evaluation
title Perceptions of a short animated film on adverse childhood experiences: a mixed methods evaluation
title_full Perceptions of a short animated film on adverse childhood experiences: a mixed methods evaluation
title_fullStr Perceptions of a short animated film on adverse childhood experiences: a mixed methods evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions of a short animated film on adverse childhood experiences: a mixed methods evaluation
title_short Perceptions of a short animated film on adverse childhood experiences: a mixed methods evaluation
title_sort perceptions of a short animated film on adverse childhood experiences: a mixed methods evaluation
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8372873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34404714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050398
work_keys_str_mv AT fordkat perceptionsofashortanimatedfilmonadversechildhoodexperiencesamixedmethodsevaluation
AT bellismarka perceptionsofashortanimatedfilmonadversechildhoodexperiencesamixedmethodsevaluation
AT isherwoodkater perceptionsofashortanimatedfilmonadversechildhoodexperiencesamixedmethodsevaluation
AT hugheskarene perceptionsofashortanimatedfilmonadversechildhoodexperiencesamixedmethodsevaluation