Cargando…

Assessing the Quality of Serological Testing in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of a European External Quality Assessment (EQA) Scheme for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Detection

External quality assessment (EQA) is a key instrument for achieving harmonization, and thus a high quality, of diagnostic procedures. As reliable test results are crucial for accurate assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence, vaccine response, and immunity, and thus for successful management of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ast, Volker, Costina, Victor, Eichner, Romy, Bode, Anna, Aida, Sihem, Gerhards, Catharina, Thiaucourt, Margot, Dobler, Gerhard, Geilenkeuser, Wolf-Jochen, Wölfel, Roman, Neumaier, Michael, Haselmann, Verena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8373014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00559-21
_version_ 1783739871388499968
author Ast, Volker
Costina, Victor
Eichner, Romy
Bode, Anna
Aida, Sihem
Gerhards, Catharina
Thiaucourt, Margot
Dobler, Gerhard
Geilenkeuser, Wolf-Jochen
Wölfel, Roman
Neumaier, Michael
Haselmann, Verena
author_facet Ast, Volker
Costina, Victor
Eichner, Romy
Bode, Anna
Aida, Sihem
Gerhards, Catharina
Thiaucourt, Margot
Dobler, Gerhard
Geilenkeuser, Wolf-Jochen
Wölfel, Roman
Neumaier, Michael
Haselmann, Verena
author_sort Ast, Volker
collection PubMed
description External quality assessment (EQA) is a key instrument for achieving harmonization, and thus a high quality, of diagnostic procedures. As reliable test results are crucial for accurate assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence, vaccine response, and immunity, and thus for successful management of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the Reference Institute for Bioanalytics (RfB) was the first EQA provider to offer an open scheme for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection. The main objectives of this EQA were (i) to gain insights into the current diagnostic landscape and the performance of serological tests in Europe and (ii) to provide recommendations for diagnostic improvements. Within the EQA, a blinded panel of precharacterized human serum samples with variable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers was provided for detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies. Across the three distribution rounds in 2020, 284 laboratories from 22 countries reported a total of 3,744 results for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection using more than 24 different assays for IgG. Overall, 97/3,004 results were false for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, 88/248 for IgA, and 34/124 for IgM. Regarding diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, substantial differences were found between the different assays used, as well as between certified and noncertified tests. For cutoff samples, a drop in the diagnostic sensitivity to 46.3% and high interlaboratory variability were observed. In general, this EQA highlights the current variability of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection, technical limitations with respect to cutoff samples, and the lack of harmonization of testing procedures. Recommendations are provided to help laboratories and manufacturers further improve the quality of anti-SARS-CoV-2 serological diagnostics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8373014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83730142021-08-25 Assessing the Quality of Serological Testing in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of a European External Quality Assessment (EQA) Scheme for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Detection Ast, Volker Costina, Victor Eichner, Romy Bode, Anna Aida, Sihem Gerhards, Catharina Thiaucourt, Margot Dobler, Gerhard Geilenkeuser, Wolf-Jochen Wölfel, Roman Neumaier, Michael Haselmann, Verena J Clin Microbiol Immunoassays External quality assessment (EQA) is a key instrument for achieving harmonization, and thus a high quality, of diagnostic procedures. As reliable test results are crucial for accurate assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence, vaccine response, and immunity, and thus for successful management of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the Reference Institute for Bioanalytics (RfB) was the first EQA provider to offer an open scheme for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection. The main objectives of this EQA were (i) to gain insights into the current diagnostic landscape and the performance of serological tests in Europe and (ii) to provide recommendations for diagnostic improvements. Within the EQA, a blinded panel of precharacterized human serum samples with variable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers was provided for detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies. Across the three distribution rounds in 2020, 284 laboratories from 22 countries reported a total of 3,744 results for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection using more than 24 different assays for IgG. Overall, 97/3,004 results were false for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, 88/248 for IgA, and 34/124 for IgM. Regarding diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, substantial differences were found between the different assays used, as well as between certified and noncertified tests. For cutoff samples, a drop in the diagnostic sensitivity to 46.3% and high interlaboratory variability were observed. In general, this EQA highlights the current variability of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection, technical limitations with respect to cutoff samples, and the lack of harmonization of testing procedures. Recommendations are provided to help laboratories and manufacturers further improve the quality of anti-SARS-CoV-2 serological diagnostics. American Society for Microbiology 2021-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8373014/ /pubmed/34190575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00559-21 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ast et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Immunoassays
Ast, Volker
Costina, Victor
Eichner, Romy
Bode, Anna
Aida, Sihem
Gerhards, Catharina
Thiaucourt, Margot
Dobler, Gerhard
Geilenkeuser, Wolf-Jochen
Wölfel, Roman
Neumaier, Michael
Haselmann, Verena
Assessing the Quality of Serological Testing in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of a European External Quality Assessment (EQA) Scheme for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Detection
title Assessing the Quality of Serological Testing in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of a European External Quality Assessment (EQA) Scheme for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Detection
title_full Assessing the Quality of Serological Testing in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of a European External Quality Assessment (EQA) Scheme for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Detection
title_fullStr Assessing the Quality of Serological Testing in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of a European External Quality Assessment (EQA) Scheme for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Detection
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Quality of Serological Testing in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of a European External Quality Assessment (EQA) Scheme for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Detection
title_short Assessing the Quality of Serological Testing in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of a European External Quality Assessment (EQA) Scheme for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Detection
title_sort assessing the quality of serological testing in the covid-19 pandemic: results of a european external quality assessment (eqa) scheme for anti-sars-cov-2 antibody detection
topic Immunoassays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8373014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00559-21
work_keys_str_mv AT astvolker assessingthequalityofserologicaltestinginthecovid19pandemicresultsofaeuropeanexternalqualityassessmenteqaschemeforantisarscov2antibodydetection
AT costinavictor assessingthequalityofserologicaltestinginthecovid19pandemicresultsofaeuropeanexternalqualityassessmenteqaschemeforantisarscov2antibodydetection
AT eichnerromy assessingthequalityofserologicaltestinginthecovid19pandemicresultsofaeuropeanexternalqualityassessmenteqaschemeforantisarscov2antibodydetection
AT bodeanna assessingthequalityofserologicaltestinginthecovid19pandemicresultsofaeuropeanexternalqualityassessmenteqaschemeforantisarscov2antibodydetection
AT aidasihem assessingthequalityofserologicaltestinginthecovid19pandemicresultsofaeuropeanexternalqualityassessmenteqaschemeforantisarscov2antibodydetection
AT gerhardscatharina assessingthequalityofserologicaltestinginthecovid19pandemicresultsofaeuropeanexternalqualityassessmenteqaschemeforantisarscov2antibodydetection
AT thiaucourtmargot assessingthequalityofserologicaltestinginthecovid19pandemicresultsofaeuropeanexternalqualityassessmenteqaschemeforantisarscov2antibodydetection
AT doblergerhard assessingthequalityofserologicaltestinginthecovid19pandemicresultsofaeuropeanexternalqualityassessmenteqaschemeforantisarscov2antibodydetection
AT geilenkeuserwolfjochen assessingthequalityofserologicaltestinginthecovid19pandemicresultsofaeuropeanexternalqualityassessmenteqaschemeforantisarscov2antibodydetection
AT wolfelroman assessingthequalityofserologicaltestinginthecovid19pandemicresultsofaeuropeanexternalqualityassessmenteqaschemeforantisarscov2antibodydetection
AT neumaiermichael assessingthequalityofserologicaltestinginthecovid19pandemicresultsofaeuropeanexternalqualityassessmenteqaschemeforantisarscov2antibodydetection
AT haselmannverena assessingthequalityofserologicaltestinginthecovid19pandemicresultsofaeuropeanexternalqualityassessmenteqaschemeforantisarscov2antibodydetection