Cargando…
A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel
Bacteremia can progress to septic shock and death without appropriate medical intervention. Increasing evidence supports the role of molecular diagnostic panels in reducing the clinical impact of these infections through rapid identification of the infecting organism and associated antimicrobial res...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8373019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34232066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02484-20 |
_version_ | 1783739872344801280 |
---|---|
author | Wolk, Donna M. Young, Stephen Whitfield, Natalie N. Reid, Jennifer L. Thornberg, Adam Carroll, Karen C. Buchan, Blake W. Davis, Thomas E. Salimnia, Hossein |
author_facet | Wolk, Donna M. Young, Stephen Whitfield, Natalie N. Reid, Jennifer L. Thornberg, Adam Carroll, Karen C. Buchan, Blake W. Davis, Thomas E. Salimnia, Hossein |
author_sort | Wolk, Donna M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bacteremia can progress to septic shock and death without appropriate medical intervention. Increasing evidence supports the role of molecular diagnostic panels in reducing the clinical impact of these infections through rapid identification of the infecting organism and associated antimicrobial resistance genes. We report the results of a multicenter clinical study assessing the performance of the GenMark Dx ePlex investigational-use-only blood culture identification Gram-negative panel (BCID-GN), a rapid diagnostic assay for detection of bloodstream pathogens in positive blood culture (PBC) bottles. Prospective, retrospective, and contrived samples were tested. Results from the BCID-GN were compared to standard-of-care bacterial identification methods. Antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) were identified using PCR and sequence analysis. The final BCID-GN analysis included 2,444 PBC samples, of which 926 were clinical samples with negative Gram stain results. Of these, 109 samples had false-negative and/or -positive results, resulting in an overall sample accuracy of 88.2% (817/926). After discordant resolution, overall sample accuracy increased to 92.9% (860/926). Pre- and postdiscordant resolution sample accuracy excludes 37 Gram-negative organisms representing 20 uncommon genera, 10 Gram-positive organisms, and 1 Candida species present in 5% of samples that are not targeted by the BCID-GN. The overall weighted positive percent agreement (PPA), which averages the individual PPAs from the 27 targets (Gram-negative and ARG), was 94.9%. The limit of detection ranged from 10(4) to 10(7) CFU/ml, except for one strain of Fusobacterium necrophorum at 10(8) CFU/ml. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8373019 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83730192022-02-18 A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel Wolk, Donna M. Young, Stephen Whitfield, Natalie N. Reid, Jennifer L. Thornberg, Adam Carroll, Karen C. Buchan, Blake W. Davis, Thomas E. Salimnia, Hossein J Clin Microbiol Bacteriology Bacteremia can progress to septic shock and death without appropriate medical intervention. Increasing evidence supports the role of molecular diagnostic panels in reducing the clinical impact of these infections through rapid identification of the infecting organism and associated antimicrobial resistance genes. We report the results of a multicenter clinical study assessing the performance of the GenMark Dx ePlex investigational-use-only blood culture identification Gram-negative panel (BCID-GN), a rapid diagnostic assay for detection of bloodstream pathogens in positive blood culture (PBC) bottles. Prospective, retrospective, and contrived samples were tested. Results from the BCID-GN were compared to standard-of-care bacterial identification methods. Antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) were identified using PCR and sequence analysis. The final BCID-GN analysis included 2,444 PBC samples, of which 926 were clinical samples with negative Gram stain results. Of these, 109 samples had false-negative and/or -positive results, resulting in an overall sample accuracy of 88.2% (817/926). After discordant resolution, overall sample accuracy increased to 92.9% (860/926). Pre- and postdiscordant resolution sample accuracy excludes 37 Gram-negative organisms representing 20 uncommon genera, 10 Gram-positive organisms, and 1 Candida species present in 5% of samples that are not targeted by the BCID-GN. The overall weighted positive percent agreement (PPA), which averages the individual PPAs from the 27 targets (Gram-negative and ARG), was 94.9%. The limit of detection ranged from 10(4) to 10(7) CFU/ml, except for one strain of Fusobacterium necrophorum at 10(8) CFU/ml. American Society for Microbiology 2021-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8373019/ /pubmed/34232066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02484-20 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wolk et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Bacteriology Wolk, Donna M. Young, Stephen Whitfield, Natalie N. Reid, Jennifer L. Thornberg, Adam Carroll, Karen C. Buchan, Blake W. Davis, Thomas E. Salimnia, Hossein A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel |
title | A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel |
title_full | A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel |
title_fullStr | A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel |
title_full_unstemmed | A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel |
title_short | A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel |
title_sort | multicenter clinical study to demonstrate the diagnostic accuracy of the genmark dx eplex blood culture identification gram-negative panel |
topic | Bacteriology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8373019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34232066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02484-20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wolkdonnam amulticenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel AT youngstephen amulticenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel AT whitfieldnatalien amulticenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel AT reidjenniferl amulticenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel AT thornbergadam amulticenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel AT carrollkarenc amulticenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel AT buchanblakew amulticenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel AT davisthomase amulticenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel AT salimniahossein amulticenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel AT wolkdonnam multicenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel AT youngstephen multicenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel AT whitfieldnatalien multicenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel AT reidjenniferl multicenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel AT thornbergadam multicenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel AT carrollkarenc multicenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel AT buchanblakew multicenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel AT davisthomase multicenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel AT salimniahossein multicenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel |