Cargando…

A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel

Bacteremia can progress to septic shock and death without appropriate medical intervention. Increasing evidence supports the role of molecular diagnostic panels in reducing the clinical impact of these infections through rapid identification of the infecting organism and associated antimicrobial res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolk, Donna M., Young, Stephen, Whitfield, Natalie N., Reid, Jennifer L., Thornberg, Adam, Carroll, Karen C., Buchan, Blake W., Davis, Thomas E., Salimnia, Hossein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8373019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34232066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02484-20
_version_ 1783739872344801280
author Wolk, Donna M.
Young, Stephen
Whitfield, Natalie N.
Reid, Jennifer L.
Thornberg, Adam
Carroll, Karen C.
Buchan, Blake W.
Davis, Thomas E.
Salimnia, Hossein
author_facet Wolk, Donna M.
Young, Stephen
Whitfield, Natalie N.
Reid, Jennifer L.
Thornberg, Adam
Carroll, Karen C.
Buchan, Blake W.
Davis, Thomas E.
Salimnia, Hossein
author_sort Wolk, Donna M.
collection PubMed
description Bacteremia can progress to septic shock and death without appropriate medical intervention. Increasing evidence supports the role of molecular diagnostic panels in reducing the clinical impact of these infections through rapid identification of the infecting organism and associated antimicrobial resistance genes. We report the results of a multicenter clinical study assessing the performance of the GenMark Dx ePlex investigational-use-only blood culture identification Gram-negative panel (BCID-GN), a rapid diagnostic assay for detection of bloodstream pathogens in positive blood culture (PBC) bottles. Prospective, retrospective, and contrived samples were tested. Results from the BCID-GN were compared to standard-of-care bacterial identification methods. Antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) were identified using PCR and sequence analysis. The final BCID-GN analysis included 2,444 PBC samples, of which 926 were clinical samples with negative Gram stain results. Of these, 109 samples had false-negative and/or -positive results, resulting in an overall sample accuracy of 88.2% (817/926). After discordant resolution, overall sample accuracy increased to 92.9% (860/926). Pre- and postdiscordant resolution sample accuracy excludes 37 Gram-negative organisms representing 20 uncommon genera, 10 Gram-positive organisms, and 1 Candida species present in 5% of samples that are not targeted by the BCID-GN. The overall weighted positive percent agreement (PPA), which averages the individual PPAs from the 27 targets (Gram-negative and ARG), was 94.9%. The limit of detection ranged from 10(4) to 10(7) CFU/ml, except for one strain of Fusobacterium necrophorum at 10(8) CFU/ml.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8373019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83730192022-02-18 A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel Wolk, Donna M. Young, Stephen Whitfield, Natalie N. Reid, Jennifer L. Thornberg, Adam Carroll, Karen C. Buchan, Blake W. Davis, Thomas E. Salimnia, Hossein J Clin Microbiol Bacteriology Bacteremia can progress to septic shock and death without appropriate medical intervention. Increasing evidence supports the role of molecular diagnostic panels in reducing the clinical impact of these infections through rapid identification of the infecting organism and associated antimicrobial resistance genes. We report the results of a multicenter clinical study assessing the performance of the GenMark Dx ePlex investigational-use-only blood culture identification Gram-negative panel (BCID-GN), a rapid diagnostic assay for detection of bloodstream pathogens in positive blood culture (PBC) bottles. Prospective, retrospective, and contrived samples were tested. Results from the BCID-GN were compared to standard-of-care bacterial identification methods. Antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) were identified using PCR and sequence analysis. The final BCID-GN analysis included 2,444 PBC samples, of which 926 were clinical samples with negative Gram stain results. Of these, 109 samples had false-negative and/or -positive results, resulting in an overall sample accuracy of 88.2% (817/926). After discordant resolution, overall sample accuracy increased to 92.9% (860/926). Pre- and postdiscordant resolution sample accuracy excludes 37 Gram-negative organisms representing 20 uncommon genera, 10 Gram-positive organisms, and 1 Candida species present in 5% of samples that are not targeted by the BCID-GN. The overall weighted positive percent agreement (PPA), which averages the individual PPAs from the 27 targets (Gram-negative and ARG), was 94.9%. The limit of detection ranged from 10(4) to 10(7) CFU/ml, except for one strain of Fusobacterium necrophorum at 10(8) CFU/ml. American Society for Microbiology 2021-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8373019/ /pubmed/34232066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02484-20 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wolk et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Bacteriology
Wolk, Donna M.
Young, Stephen
Whitfield, Natalie N.
Reid, Jennifer L.
Thornberg, Adam
Carroll, Karen C.
Buchan, Blake W.
Davis, Thomas E.
Salimnia, Hossein
A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel
title A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel
title_full A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel
title_fullStr A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel
title_full_unstemmed A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel
title_short A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel
title_sort multicenter clinical study to demonstrate the diagnostic accuracy of the genmark dx eplex blood culture identification gram-negative panel
topic Bacteriology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8373019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34232066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02484-20
work_keys_str_mv AT wolkdonnam amulticenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel
AT youngstephen amulticenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel
AT whitfieldnatalien amulticenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel
AT reidjenniferl amulticenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel
AT thornbergadam amulticenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel
AT carrollkarenc amulticenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel
AT buchanblakew amulticenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel
AT davisthomase amulticenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel
AT salimniahossein amulticenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel
AT wolkdonnam multicenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel
AT youngstephen multicenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel
AT whitfieldnatalien multicenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel
AT reidjenniferl multicenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel
AT thornbergadam multicenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel
AT carrollkarenc multicenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel
AT buchanblakew multicenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel
AT davisthomase multicenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel
AT salimniahossein multicenterclinicalstudytodemonstratethediagnosticaccuracyofthegenmarkdxeplexbloodcultureidentificationgramnegativepanel