Cargando…
A randomised controlled trial to clinically validate follitropin delta in its individualised dosing regimen for ovarian stimulation in Asian IVF/ICSI patients
STUDY QUESTION: Is ovarian stimulation with follitropin delta in its individualised fixed-dose regimen at least as efficacious as follitropin alfa in a conventional dosing regimen in Asian population? SUMMARY ANSWER: Ovarian stimulation with individualised follitropin delta dosing resulted in a non-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8373472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34179971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab155 |
_version_ | 1783739947874779136 |
---|---|
author | Qiao, Jie Zhang, Yunshan Liang, Xiaoyan Ho, Tuong Huang, Hong-Yuan Kim, Sung-Hoon Goethberg, Marie Mannaerts, Bernadette Arce, Joan-Carles |
author_facet | Qiao, Jie Zhang, Yunshan Liang, Xiaoyan Ho, Tuong Huang, Hong-Yuan Kim, Sung-Hoon Goethberg, Marie Mannaerts, Bernadette Arce, Joan-Carles |
author_sort | Qiao, Jie |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY QUESTION: Is ovarian stimulation with follitropin delta in its individualised fixed-dose regimen at least as efficacious as follitropin alfa in a conventional dosing regimen in Asian population? SUMMARY ANSWER: Ovarian stimulation with individualised follitropin delta dosing resulted in a non-inferior ongoing pregnancy rate, a significantly higher live birth rate and a significantly lower incidence of early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and/or preventive interventions compared to conventional follitropin alfa dosing. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Previous randomised controlled trials conducted in Japan as well as in Europe, North- and South America have demonstrated that ovarian stimulation with the individualised follitropin delta dosing regimen based on serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level and body weight modulated the ovarian response and reduced the risk of OHSS without compromising pregnancy and live birth rates. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Randomised, controlled, multi-centre, assessor-blind trial conducted in 1009 Asian patients from mainland China, South Korea, Vietnam and Taiwan, undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle. Randomisation was stratified by age (<35, 35–37, 38–40 years). The primary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy rate assessed 10–11 weeks after embryo transfer in the fresh cycle (non-inferiority limit −10.0%; analysis adjusted for age stratum). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The follitropin delta treatment consisted of a fixed daily dose individualised according to each patient’s initial AMH level and body weight (AMH <15 pmol/l: 12 μg; AMH ≥15 pmol/l: 0.19 to 0.10 μg/kg; min-max 6–12 μg). The follitropin alfa dose was 150 IU/day for the first 5 days with subsequent potential dose adjustments according to individual response. A GnRH antagonist protocol was applied. OHSS was classified based on Golan’s system. Women with an ongoing pregnancy were followed until live birth and 4 weeks after. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The number of oocytes retrieved was significantly (P < 0.001) lower with individualised follitropin delta versus conventional follitropin alfa (10.0 ± 6.1 versus 12.4 ± 7.3). Nevertheless, compared to the conventional dosing approach, the individualised follitropin delta dosing regimen resulted in on average 2 more oocytes (9.6 ± 5.3 versus 7.6 ± 3.5) in potential low responders as indicated by AMH <15 pmol/l, and on average 3 fewer oocytes (10.1 ± 6.3 versus 13.8 ± 7.5) in potential high responders as indicated by AMH ≥15 pmol/l. Among women with AMH ≥15 pmol/l, excessive response occurred less frequently with individualised follitropin delta than with follitropin alfa (≥15 oocytes: 20.2% versus 39.1%; ≥20 oocytes: 6.7% versus 18.5%; both P < 0.001). The incidence of early OHSS and/or preventive interventions for early OHSS was significantly (P = 0.004) reduced from 9.6% with follitropin alfa to 5.0% with individualised follitropin delta. The total gonadotropin use was significantly (P < 0.001) reduced from an average of 109.9 ± 32.9 μg (1498 ± 448 IU) follitropin alfa to 77.5 ± 24.4 μg follitropin delta. Non-inferiority of follitropin delta in its individualised dosing regimen to conventional follitropin alfa was established with respect to the primary endpoint of ongoing pregnancy rate which was 31.3% with follitropin delta compared to 25.7% with follitropin alfa (estimated mean difference 5.4% [95% CI: −0.2%; 11.0%]). The live birth rate was significantly higher at 31.3% with individualised follitropin delta compared to 24.7% with follitropin alfa (estimated mean difference 6.4% [95% CI: 0.9%; 11.9%]; P = 0.023). The live birth rate for each stratum were as follows for follitropin delta and follitropin alfa, respectively; <35 years: 31.0% versus 25.0%, 35–37 years: 35.3% versus 26.7%, 38–40 years: 20.0% versus 14.3%. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The trial only covered the clinical outcome of one treatment cycle with fresh cleavage-stage embryo transfers. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The present trial shows that in addition to reducing the early OHSS risk, follitropin delta in its individualised fixed-dose regimen has the potential to improve the success rate in fresh cycles across all ages and with a lower gonadotropin consumption compared to conventional follitropin alfa dosing. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals. J.Q., Y.Z., X.L., T.H., H.-Y.H. and S.-H.K. have received institutional (not personal) clinical trial fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals. M.G., B.M. and J.-C.A. are employees of Ferring Pharmaceuticals. J.-C.A. has pending and issued patent applications in the WO 2013/020996 and WO 2019/043143 patent families that comprise allowed and granted patent rights related to follitropin delta. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03296527 (clinicaltrials.gov). TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 28 September 2017 DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT: 1 December 2017 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8373472 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83734722021-08-19 A randomised controlled trial to clinically validate follitropin delta in its individualised dosing regimen for ovarian stimulation in Asian IVF/ICSI patients Qiao, Jie Zhang, Yunshan Liang, Xiaoyan Ho, Tuong Huang, Hong-Yuan Kim, Sung-Hoon Goethberg, Marie Mannaerts, Bernadette Arce, Joan-Carles Hum Reprod Original Articles STUDY QUESTION: Is ovarian stimulation with follitropin delta in its individualised fixed-dose regimen at least as efficacious as follitropin alfa in a conventional dosing regimen in Asian population? SUMMARY ANSWER: Ovarian stimulation with individualised follitropin delta dosing resulted in a non-inferior ongoing pregnancy rate, a significantly higher live birth rate and a significantly lower incidence of early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and/or preventive interventions compared to conventional follitropin alfa dosing. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Previous randomised controlled trials conducted in Japan as well as in Europe, North- and South America have demonstrated that ovarian stimulation with the individualised follitropin delta dosing regimen based on serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level and body weight modulated the ovarian response and reduced the risk of OHSS without compromising pregnancy and live birth rates. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Randomised, controlled, multi-centre, assessor-blind trial conducted in 1009 Asian patients from mainland China, South Korea, Vietnam and Taiwan, undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle. Randomisation was stratified by age (<35, 35–37, 38–40 years). The primary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy rate assessed 10–11 weeks after embryo transfer in the fresh cycle (non-inferiority limit −10.0%; analysis adjusted for age stratum). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The follitropin delta treatment consisted of a fixed daily dose individualised according to each patient’s initial AMH level and body weight (AMH <15 pmol/l: 12 μg; AMH ≥15 pmol/l: 0.19 to 0.10 μg/kg; min-max 6–12 μg). The follitropin alfa dose was 150 IU/day for the first 5 days with subsequent potential dose adjustments according to individual response. A GnRH antagonist protocol was applied. OHSS was classified based on Golan’s system. Women with an ongoing pregnancy were followed until live birth and 4 weeks after. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The number of oocytes retrieved was significantly (P < 0.001) lower with individualised follitropin delta versus conventional follitropin alfa (10.0 ± 6.1 versus 12.4 ± 7.3). Nevertheless, compared to the conventional dosing approach, the individualised follitropin delta dosing regimen resulted in on average 2 more oocytes (9.6 ± 5.3 versus 7.6 ± 3.5) in potential low responders as indicated by AMH <15 pmol/l, and on average 3 fewer oocytes (10.1 ± 6.3 versus 13.8 ± 7.5) in potential high responders as indicated by AMH ≥15 pmol/l. Among women with AMH ≥15 pmol/l, excessive response occurred less frequently with individualised follitropin delta than with follitropin alfa (≥15 oocytes: 20.2% versus 39.1%; ≥20 oocytes: 6.7% versus 18.5%; both P < 0.001). The incidence of early OHSS and/or preventive interventions for early OHSS was significantly (P = 0.004) reduced from 9.6% with follitropin alfa to 5.0% with individualised follitropin delta. The total gonadotropin use was significantly (P < 0.001) reduced from an average of 109.9 ± 32.9 μg (1498 ± 448 IU) follitropin alfa to 77.5 ± 24.4 μg follitropin delta. Non-inferiority of follitropin delta in its individualised dosing regimen to conventional follitropin alfa was established with respect to the primary endpoint of ongoing pregnancy rate which was 31.3% with follitropin delta compared to 25.7% with follitropin alfa (estimated mean difference 5.4% [95% CI: −0.2%; 11.0%]). The live birth rate was significantly higher at 31.3% with individualised follitropin delta compared to 24.7% with follitropin alfa (estimated mean difference 6.4% [95% CI: 0.9%; 11.9%]; P = 0.023). The live birth rate for each stratum were as follows for follitropin delta and follitropin alfa, respectively; <35 years: 31.0% versus 25.0%, 35–37 years: 35.3% versus 26.7%, 38–40 years: 20.0% versus 14.3%. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The trial only covered the clinical outcome of one treatment cycle with fresh cleavage-stage embryo transfers. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The present trial shows that in addition to reducing the early OHSS risk, follitropin delta in its individualised fixed-dose regimen has the potential to improve the success rate in fresh cycles across all ages and with a lower gonadotropin consumption compared to conventional follitropin alfa dosing. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals. J.Q., Y.Z., X.L., T.H., H.-Y.H. and S.-H.K. have received institutional (not personal) clinical trial fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals. M.G., B.M. and J.-C.A. are employees of Ferring Pharmaceuticals. J.-C.A. has pending and issued patent applications in the WO 2013/020996 and WO 2019/043143 patent families that comprise allowed and granted patent rights related to follitropin delta. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03296527 (clinicaltrials.gov). TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 28 September 2017 DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT: 1 December 2017 Oxford University Press 2021-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8373472/ /pubmed/34179971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab155 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Qiao, Jie Zhang, Yunshan Liang, Xiaoyan Ho, Tuong Huang, Hong-Yuan Kim, Sung-Hoon Goethberg, Marie Mannaerts, Bernadette Arce, Joan-Carles A randomised controlled trial to clinically validate follitropin delta in its individualised dosing regimen for ovarian stimulation in Asian IVF/ICSI patients |
title | A randomised controlled trial to clinically validate follitropin delta in its individualised dosing regimen for ovarian stimulation in Asian IVF/ICSI patients |
title_full | A randomised controlled trial to clinically validate follitropin delta in its individualised dosing regimen for ovarian stimulation in Asian IVF/ICSI patients |
title_fullStr | A randomised controlled trial to clinically validate follitropin delta in its individualised dosing regimen for ovarian stimulation in Asian IVF/ICSI patients |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomised controlled trial to clinically validate follitropin delta in its individualised dosing regimen for ovarian stimulation in Asian IVF/ICSI patients |
title_short | A randomised controlled trial to clinically validate follitropin delta in its individualised dosing regimen for ovarian stimulation in Asian IVF/ICSI patients |
title_sort | randomised controlled trial to clinically validate follitropin delta in its individualised dosing regimen for ovarian stimulation in asian ivf/icsi patients |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8373472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34179971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab155 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qiaojie arandomisedcontrolledtrialtoclinicallyvalidatefollitropindeltainitsindividualiseddosingregimenforovarianstimulationinasianivficsipatients AT zhangyunshan arandomisedcontrolledtrialtoclinicallyvalidatefollitropindeltainitsindividualiseddosingregimenforovarianstimulationinasianivficsipatients AT liangxiaoyan arandomisedcontrolledtrialtoclinicallyvalidatefollitropindeltainitsindividualiseddosingregimenforovarianstimulationinasianivficsipatients AT hotuong arandomisedcontrolledtrialtoclinicallyvalidatefollitropindeltainitsindividualiseddosingregimenforovarianstimulationinasianivficsipatients AT huanghongyuan arandomisedcontrolledtrialtoclinicallyvalidatefollitropindeltainitsindividualiseddosingregimenforovarianstimulationinasianivficsipatients AT kimsunghoon arandomisedcontrolledtrialtoclinicallyvalidatefollitropindeltainitsindividualiseddosingregimenforovarianstimulationinasianivficsipatients AT goethbergmarie arandomisedcontrolledtrialtoclinicallyvalidatefollitropindeltainitsindividualiseddosingregimenforovarianstimulationinasianivficsipatients AT mannaertsbernadette arandomisedcontrolledtrialtoclinicallyvalidatefollitropindeltainitsindividualiseddosingregimenforovarianstimulationinasianivficsipatients AT arcejoancarles arandomisedcontrolledtrialtoclinicallyvalidatefollitropindeltainitsindividualiseddosingregimenforovarianstimulationinasianivficsipatients AT qiaojie randomisedcontrolledtrialtoclinicallyvalidatefollitropindeltainitsindividualiseddosingregimenforovarianstimulationinasianivficsipatients AT zhangyunshan randomisedcontrolledtrialtoclinicallyvalidatefollitropindeltainitsindividualiseddosingregimenforovarianstimulationinasianivficsipatients AT liangxiaoyan randomisedcontrolledtrialtoclinicallyvalidatefollitropindeltainitsindividualiseddosingregimenforovarianstimulationinasianivficsipatients AT hotuong randomisedcontrolledtrialtoclinicallyvalidatefollitropindeltainitsindividualiseddosingregimenforovarianstimulationinasianivficsipatients AT huanghongyuan randomisedcontrolledtrialtoclinicallyvalidatefollitropindeltainitsindividualiseddosingregimenforovarianstimulationinasianivficsipatients AT kimsunghoon randomisedcontrolledtrialtoclinicallyvalidatefollitropindeltainitsindividualiseddosingregimenforovarianstimulationinasianivficsipatients AT goethbergmarie randomisedcontrolledtrialtoclinicallyvalidatefollitropindeltainitsindividualiseddosingregimenforovarianstimulationinasianivficsipatients AT mannaertsbernadette randomisedcontrolledtrialtoclinicallyvalidatefollitropindeltainitsindividualiseddosingregimenforovarianstimulationinasianivficsipatients AT arcejoancarles randomisedcontrolledtrialtoclinicallyvalidatefollitropindeltainitsindividualiseddosingregimenforovarianstimulationinasianivficsipatients |