Cargando…

The Influence of Different Surface Cleansing Agents on Shear Bond Strength of Contaminated Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: An In Vitro Study

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy LDS specimens were randomly divided into seven groups. The first group was noncontaminated surface (PC). The six other groups were contaminated with the saliva and silicone disclosing medium and treated with no surface cleansing agent (NC); phosphoric acid (PO); Ivocle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Charasseangpaisarn, Taksid, Krassanairawiwong, Pattarawadee, Sangkanchanavanich, Chanidapa, Kurjirattikan, Atima, Kunyawatyuwapong, Kanyarak, Tantivasin, Natlada
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8373498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34422055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/7112400
_version_ 1783739953749950464
author Charasseangpaisarn, Taksid
Krassanairawiwong, Pattarawadee
Sangkanchanavanich, Chanidapa
Kurjirattikan, Atima
Kunyawatyuwapong, Kanyarak
Tantivasin, Natlada
author_facet Charasseangpaisarn, Taksid
Krassanairawiwong, Pattarawadee
Sangkanchanavanich, Chanidapa
Kurjirattikan, Atima
Kunyawatyuwapong, Kanyarak
Tantivasin, Natlada
author_sort Charasseangpaisarn, Taksid
collection PubMed
description MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy LDS specimens were randomly divided into seven groups. The first group was noncontaminated surface (PC). The six other groups were contaminated with the saliva and silicone disclosing medium and treated with no surface cleansing agent (NC); phosphoric acid (PO); Ivoclean (IV); sodium hydroxide solution (NA); Restorative Cleansing Agent (RC); and hydrofluoric acid (HF). Then, LDS specimens were cementated with Panavia V5 to resin composite rod. Each specimen was subjected to an SBS test. The modes of failure was inspected under light microscope. The surface element of each group was examined by SEM-EDS. RESULTS: The results were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tamhane's T2. The mean SBS value of NC was significantly lower than others (p < 0.05), and HF was significantly higher than others (p < 0.05). However, PC, PO, IV, NA, and RC were not significantly different from each other (p > 0.05). The mode of failure was mostly adhesive failure in every group. The surface showed similar amount of elements in every group. CONCLUSIONS: The SBS of LDS was reduced by saliva and silicone disclosing medium contamination which can be restored using acid- and alkaline-based surface cleansing agents before the cementation procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8373498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83734982021-08-19 The Influence of Different Surface Cleansing Agents on Shear Bond Strength of Contaminated Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: An In Vitro Study Charasseangpaisarn, Taksid Krassanairawiwong, Pattarawadee Sangkanchanavanich, Chanidapa Kurjirattikan, Atima Kunyawatyuwapong, Kanyarak Tantivasin, Natlada Int J Dent Research Article MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy LDS specimens were randomly divided into seven groups. The first group was noncontaminated surface (PC). The six other groups were contaminated with the saliva and silicone disclosing medium and treated with no surface cleansing agent (NC); phosphoric acid (PO); Ivoclean (IV); sodium hydroxide solution (NA); Restorative Cleansing Agent (RC); and hydrofluoric acid (HF). Then, LDS specimens were cementated with Panavia V5 to resin composite rod. Each specimen was subjected to an SBS test. The modes of failure was inspected under light microscope. The surface element of each group was examined by SEM-EDS. RESULTS: The results were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tamhane's T2. The mean SBS value of NC was significantly lower than others (p < 0.05), and HF was significantly higher than others (p < 0.05). However, PC, PO, IV, NA, and RC were not significantly different from each other (p > 0.05). The mode of failure was mostly adhesive failure in every group. The surface showed similar amount of elements in every group. CONCLUSIONS: The SBS of LDS was reduced by saliva and silicone disclosing medium contamination which can be restored using acid- and alkaline-based surface cleansing agents before the cementation procedure. Hindawi 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8373498/ /pubmed/34422055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/7112400 Text en Copyright © 2021 Taksid Charasseangpaisarn et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Charasseangpaisarn, Taksid
Krassanairawiwong, Pattarawadee
Sangkanchanavanich, Chanidapa
Kurjirattikan, Atima
Kunyawatyuwapong, Kanyarak
Tantivasin, Natlada
The Influence of Different Surface Cleansing Agents on Shear Bond Strength of Contaminated Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: An In Vitro Study
title The Influence of Different Surface Cleansing Agents on Shear Bond Strength of Contaminated Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: An In Vitro Study
title_full The Influence of Different Surface Cleansing Agents on Shear Bond Strength of Contaminated Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr The Influence of Different Surface Cleansing Agents on Shear Bond Strength of Contaminated Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Different Surface Cleansing Agents on Shear Bond Strength of Contaminated Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: An In Vitro Study
title_short The Influence of Different Surface Cleansing Agents on Shear Bond Strength of Contaminated Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: An In Vitro Study
title_sort influence of different surface cleansing agents on shear bond strength of contaminated lithium disilicate ceramic: an in vitro study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8373498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34422055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/7112400
work_keys_str_mv AT charasseangpaisarntaksid theinfluenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy
AT krassanairawiwongpattarawadee theinfluenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy
AT sangkanchanavanichchanidapa theinfluenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy
AT kurjirattikanatima theinfluenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy
AT kunyawatyuwapongkanyarak theinfluenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy
AT tantivasinnatlada theinfluenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy
AT charasseangpaisarntaksid influenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy
AT krassanairawiwongpattarawadee influenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy
AT sangkanchanavanichchanidapa influenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy
AT kurjirattikanatima influenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy
AT kunyawatyuwapongkanyarak influenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy
AT tantivasinnatlada influenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy