Cargando…
The Influence of Different Surface Cleansing Agents on Shear Bond Strength of Contaminated Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: An In Vitro Study
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy LDS specimens were randomly divided into seven groups. The first group was noncontaminated surface (PC). The six other groups were contaminated with the saliva and silicone disclosing medium and treated with no surface cleansing agent (NC); phosphoric acid (PO); Ivocle...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8373498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34422055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/7112400 |
_version_ | 1783739953749950464 |
---|---|
author | Charasseangpaisarn, Taksid Krassanairawiwong, Pattarawadee Sangkanchanavanich, Chanidapa Kurjirattikan, Atima Kunyawatyuwapong, Kanyarak Tantivasin, Natlada |
author_facet | Charasseangpaisarn, Taksid Krassanairawiwong, Pattarawadee Sangkanchanavanich, Chanidapa Kurjirattikan, Atima Kunyawatyuwapong, Kanyarak Tantivasin, Natlada |
author_sort | Charasseangpaisarn, Taksid |
collection | PubMed |
description | MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy LDS specimens were randomly divided into seven groups. The first group was noncontaminated surface (PC). The six other groups were contaminated with the saliva and silicone disclosing medium and treated with no surface cleansing agent (NC); phosphoric acid (PO); Ivoclean (IV); sodium hydroxide solution (NA); Restorative Cleansing Agent (RC); and hydrofluoric acid (HF). Then, LDS specimens were cementated with Panavia V5 to resin composite rod. Each specimen was subjected to an SBS test. The modes of failure was inspected under light microscope. The surface element of each group was examined by SEM-EDS. RESULTS: The results were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tamhane's T2. The mean SBS value of NC was significantly lower than others (p < 0.05), and HF was significantly higher than others (p < 0.05). However, PC, PO, IV, NA, and RC were not significantly different from each other (p > 0.05). The mode of failure was mostly adhesive failure in every group. The surface showed similar amount of elements in every group. CONCLUSIONS: The SBS of LDS was reduced by saliva and silicone disclosing medium contamination which can be restored using acid- and alkaline-based surface cleansing agents before the cementation procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8373498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83734982021-08-19 The Influence of Different Surface Cleansing Agents on Shear Bond Strength of Contaminated Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: An In Vitro Study Charasseangpaisarn, Taksid Krassanairawiwong, Pattarawadee Sangkanchanavanich, Chanidapa Kurjirattikan, Atima Kunyawatyuwapong, Kanyarak Tantivasin, Natlada Int J Dent Research Article MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy LDS specimens were randomly divided into seven groups. The first group was noncontaminated surface (PC). The six other groups were contaminated with the saliva and silicone disclosing medium and treated with no surface cleansing agent (NC); phosphoric acid (PO); Ivoclean (IV); sodium hydroxide solution (NA); Restorative Cleansing Agent (RC); and hydrofluoric acid (HF). Then, LDS specimens were cementated with Panavia V5 to resin composite rod. Each specimen was subjected to an SBS test. The modes of failure was inspected under light microscope. The surface element of each group was examined by SEM-EDS. RESULTS: The results were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tamhane's T2. The mean SBS value of NC was significantly lower than others (p < 0.05), and HF was significantly higher than others (p < 0.05). However, PC, PO, IV, NA, and RC were not significantly different from each other (p > 0.05). The mode of failure was mostly adhesive failure in every group. The surface showed similar amount of elements in every group. CONCLUSIONS: The SBS of LDS was reduced by saliva and silicone disclosing medium contamination which can be restored using acid- and alkaline-based surface cleansing agents before the cementation procedure. Hindawi 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8373498/ /pubmed/34422055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/7112400 Text en Copyright © 2021 Taksid Charasseangpaisarn et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Charasseangpaisarn, Taksid Krassanairawiwong, Pattarawadee Sangkanchanavanich, Chanidapa Kurjirattikan, Atima Kunyawatyuwapong, Kanyarak Tantivasin, Natlada The Influence of Different Surface Cleansing Agents on Shear Bond Strength of Contaminated Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: An In Vitro Study |
title | The Influence of Different Surface Cleansing Agents on Shear Bond Strength of Contaminated Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: An In Vitro Study |
title_full | The Influence of Different Surface Cleansing Agents on Shear Bond Strength of Contaminated Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: An In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | The Influence of Different Surface Cleansing Agents on Shear Bond Strength of Contaminated Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: An In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Influence of Different Surface Cleansing Agents on Shear Bond Strength of Contaminated Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: An In Vitro Study |
title_short | The Influence of Different Surface Cleansing Agents on Shear Bond Strength of Contaminated Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: An In Vitro Study |
title_sort | influence of different surface cleansing agents on shear bond strength of contaminated lithium disilicate ceramic: an in vitro study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8373498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34422055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/7112400 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT charasseangpaisarntaksid theinfluenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy AT krassanairawiwongpattarawadee theinfluenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy AT sangkanchanavanichchanidapa theinfluenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy AT kurjirattikanatima theinfluenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy AT kunyawatyuwapongkanyarak theinfluenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy AT tantivasinnatlada theinfluenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy AT charasseangpaisarntaksid influenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy AT krassanairawiwongpattarawadee influenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy AT sangkanchanavanichchanidapa influenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy AT kurjirattikanatima influenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy AT kunyawatyuwapongkanyarak influenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy AT tantivasinnatlada influenceofdifferentsurfacecleansingagentsonshearbondstrengthofcontaminatedlithiumdisilicateceramicaninvitrostudy |