Cargando…
Survival analysis in breast cancer using proteomic data from four independent datasets
Breast cancer clinical treatment selection is based on the immunohistochemical determination of four protein biomarkers: ESR1, PGR, HER2, and MKI67. Our aim was to correlate immunohistochemical results to proteome-level technologies in measuring the expression of these markers. We also aimed to inte...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8373859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34408238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96340-5 |
_version_ | 1783739992666800128 |
---|---|
author | Ősz, Ágnes Lánczky, András Győrffy, Balázs |
author_facet | Ősz, Ágnes Lánczky, András Győrffy, Balázs |
author_sort | Ősz, Ágnes |
collection | PubMed |
description | Breast cancer clinical treatment selection is based on the immunohistochemical determination of four protein biomarkers: ESR1, PGR, HER2, and MKI67. Our aim was to correlate immunohistochemical results to proteome-level technologies in measuring the expression of these markers. We also aimed to integrate available proteome-level breast cancer datasets to identify and validate new prognostic biomarker candidates. We searched studies involving breast cancer patient cohorts with published survival and proteomic information. Immunohistochemistry and proteomic technologies were compared using the Mann–Whitney test. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were generated to validate discriminative power. Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis were calculated to assess prognostic power. False Discovery Rate was computed to correct for multiple hypothesis testing. We established a database integrating protein expression data and survival information from four independent cohorts for 1229 breast cancer patients. In all four studies combined, a total of 7342 unique proteins were identified, and 1417 of these were identified in at least three datasets. ESR1, PGR, and HER2 protein expression levels determined by RPPA or LC–MS/MS methods showed a significant correlation with the levels determined by immunohistochemistry (p < 0.0001). PGR and ESR1 levels showed a moderate correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.17, p = 0.0399). An additional panel of candidate proteins, including apoptosis-related proteins (BCL2,), adhesion markers (CDH1, CLDN3, CLDN7) and basal markers (cytokeratins), were validated as prognostic biomarkers. Finally, we expanded our previously established web tool designed to validate survival-associated biomarkers by including the proteomic datasets analyzed in this study (https://kmplot.com/). In summary, large proteomic studies now provide sufficient data enabling the validation and ranking of potential protein biomarkers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8373859 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83738592021-08-19 Survival analysis in breast cancer using proteomic data from four independent datasets Ősz, Ágnes Lánczky, András Győrffy, Balázs Sci Rep Article Breast cancer clinical treatment selection is based on the immunohistochemical determination of four protein biomarkers: ESR1, PGR, HER2, and MKI67. Our aim was to correlate immunohistochemical results to proteome-level technologies in measuring the expression of these markers. We also aimed to integrate available proteome-level breast cancer datasets to identify and validate new prognostic biomarker candidates. We searched studies involving breast cancer patient cohorts with published survival and proteomic information. Immunohistochemistry and proteomic technologies were compared using the Mann–Whitney test. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were generated to validate discriminative power. Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis were calculated to assess prognostic power. False Discovery Rate was computed to correct for multiple hypothesis testing. We established a database integrating protein expression data and survival information from four independent cohorts for 1229 breast cancer patients. In all four studies combined, a total of 7342 unique proteins were identified, and 1417 of these were identified in at least three datasets. ESR1, PGR, and HER2 protein expression levels determined by RPPA or LC–MS/MS methods showed a significant correlation with the levels determined by immunohistochemistry (p < 0.0001). PGR and ESR1 levels showed a moderate correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.17, p = 0.0399). An additional panel of candidate proteins, including apoptosis-related proteins (BCL2,), adhesion markers (CDH1, CLDN3, CLDN7) and basal markers (cytokeratins), were validated as prognostic biomarkers. Finally, we expanded our previously established web tool designed to validate survival-associated biomarkers by including the proteomic datasets analyzed in this study (https://kmplot.com/). In summary, large proteomic studies now provide sufficient data enabling the validation and ranking of potential protein biomarkers. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8373859/ /pubmed/34408238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96340-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Ősz, Ágnes Lánczky, András Győrffy, Balázs Survival analysis in breast cancer using proteomic data from four independent datasets |
title | Survival analysis in breast cancer using proteomic data from four independent datasets |
title_full | Survival analysis in breast cancer using proteomic data from four independent datasets |
title_fullStr | Survival analysis in breast cancer using proteomic data from four independent datasets |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival analysis in breast cancer using proteomic data from four independent datasets |
title_short | Survival analysis in breast cancer using proteomic data from four independent datasets |
title_sort | survival analysis in breast cancer using proteomic data from four independent datasets |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8373859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34408238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96340-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oszagnes survivalanalysisinbreastcancerusingproteomicdatafromfourindependentdatasets AT lanczkyandras survivalanalysisinbreastcancerusingproteomicdatafromfourindependentdatasets AT gyorffybalazs survivalanalysisinbreastcancerusingproteomicdatafromfourindependentdatasets |