Cargando…

Randomized Phase II Study to Comparing Docetaxel/Nedaplatin versus Docetaxel for 5-Fluorouracil/Cisplatin Resistant Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose: To compare efficacy and safety of dual docetaxel/nedaplatin treatment versus docetaxel alone as second-line chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer. Methods: In all, 36 patients with metastatic and/or recurrent esophagus squamous cell carcinoma resistant to first-line chemotherapy (fluo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yajima, Satoshi, Suzuki, Takashi, Nanami, Tatsuki, Oshima, Yoko, Kikuchi, Yoshinori, Funahashi, Kimihiko, Shimada, Hideaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8374090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33408308
http://dx.doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.20-00294
_version_ 1783740039543390208
author Yajima, Satoshi
Suzuki, Takashi
Nanami, Tatsuki
Oshima, Yoko
Kikuchi, Yoshinori
Funahashi, Kimihiko
Shimada, Hideaki
author_facet Yajima, Satoshi
Suzuki, Takashi
Nanami, Tatsuki
Oshima, Yoko
Kikuchi, Yoshinori
Funahashi, Kimihiko
Shimada, Hideaki
author_sort Yajima, Satoshi
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To compare efficacy and safety of dual docetaxel/nedaplatin treatment versus docetaxel alone as second-line chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer. Methods: In all, 36 patients with metastatic and/or recurrent esophagus squamous cell carcinoma resistant to first-line chemotherapy (fluorouracil/cisplatin) were recruited from 2011 to 2018 and randomized into two groups. Treatment response and survival were compared between the docetaxel/nedaplatin (60/80 mg/m(2)/day) group and docetaxel (70 mg/m(2)/day) group. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks until tumor progression. Patients were followed up until March 2019 or death. Results: The frequency of Grade 3 or higher adverse events in the docetaxel/nedaplatin group (58.8%) was higher compared with the docetaxel group (26.3%) (P = 0.090). We found a treatment response rate of 52.9% and 36.8% and a median survival of 8.9 and 7.0 months in the docetaxel/nedaplatin-treated and docetaxel-treated group, respectively (P = 0.544). Conclusion: No significant survival advantage was found for docetaxel/nedaplatin-treated patients, although there was an increased frequency of high-grade adverse events compared to docetaxel-treated patients. Because of the limited cohort size, a Phase III study based on our findings is not warranted to assess the clinical impact of docetaxel/nedaplatin treatment. This trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN 000005877).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8374090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83740902021-08-19 Randomized Phase II Study to Comparing Docetaxel/Nedaplatin versus Docetaxel for 5-Fluorouracil/Cisplatin Resistant Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Yajima, Satoshi Suzuki, Takashi Nanami, Tatsuki Oshima, Yoko Kikuchi, Yoshinori Funahashi, Kimihiko Shimada, Hideaki Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Original Article Purpose: To compare efficacy and safety of dual docetaxel/nedaplatin treatment versus docetaxel alone as second-line chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer. Methods: In all, 36 patients with metastatic and/or recurrent esophagus squamous cell carcinoma resistant to first-line chemotherapy (fluorouracil/cisplatin) were recruited from 2011 to 2018 and randomized into two groups. Treatment response and survival were compared between the docetaxel/nedaplatin (60/80 mg/m(2)/day) group and docetaxel (70 mg/m(2)/day) group. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks until tumor progression. Patients were followed up until March 2019 or death. Results: The frequency of Grade 3 or higher adverse events in the docetaxel/nedaplatin group (58.8%) was higher compared with the docetaxel group (26.3%) (P = 0.090). We found a treatment response rate of 52.9% and 36.8% and a median survival of 8.9 and 7.0 months in the docetaxel/nedaplatin-treated and docetaxel-treated group, respectively (P = 0.544). Conclusion: No significant survival advantage was found for docetaxel/nedaplatin-treated patients, although there was an increased frequency of high-grade adverse events compared to docetaxel-treated patients. Because of the limited cohort size, a Phase III study based on our findings is not warranted to assess the clinical impact of docetaxel/nedaplatin treatment. This trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN 000005877). The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2021-01-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8374090/ /pubmed/33408308 http://dx.doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.20-00294 Text en ©2021 Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NonDerivatives International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Yajima, Satoshi
Suzuki, Takashi
Nanami, Tatsuki
Oshima, Yoko
Kikuchi, Yoshinori
Funahashi, Kimihiko
Shimada, Hideaki
Randomized Phase II Study to Comparing Docetaxel/Nedaplatin versus Docetaxel for 5-Fluorouracil/Cisplatin Resistant Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title Randomized Phase II Study to Comparing Docetaxel/Nedaplatin versus Docetaxel for 5-Fluorouracil/Cisplatin Resistant Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_full Randomized Phase II Study to Comparing Docetaxel/Nedaplatin versus Docetaxel for 5-Fluorouracil/Cisplatin Resistant Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_fullStr Randomized Phase II Study to Comparing Docetaxel/Nedaplatin versus Docetaxel for 5-Fluorouracil/Cisplatin Resistant Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Randomized Phase II Study to Comparing Docetaxel/Nedaplatin versus Docetaxel for 5-Fluorouracil/Cisplatin Resistant Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_short Randomized Phase II Study to Comparing Docetaxel/Nedaplatin versus Docetaxel for 5-Fluorouracil/Cisplatin Resistant Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_sort randomized phase ii study to comparing docetaxel/nedaplatin versus docetaxel for 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin resistant esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8374090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33408308
http://dx.doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.20-00294
work_keys_str_mv AT yajimasatoshi randomizedphaseiistudytocomparingdocetaxelnedaplatinversusdocetaxelfor5fluorouracilcisplatinresistantesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT suzukitakashi randomizedphaseiistudytocomparingdocetaxelnedaplatinversusdocetaxelfor5fluorouracilcisplatinresistantesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT nanamitatsuki randomizedphaseiistudytocomparingdocetaxelnedaplatinversusdocetaxelfor5fluorouracilcisplatinresistantesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT oshimayoko randomizedphaseiistudytocomparingdocetaxelnedaplatinversusdocetaxelfor5fluorouracilcisplatinresistantesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT kikuchiyoshinori randomizedphaseiistudytocomparingdocetaxelnedaplatinversusdocetaxelfor5fluorouracilcisplatinresistantesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT funahashikimihiko randomizedphaseiistudytocomparingdocetaxelnedaplatinversusdocetaxelfor5fluorouracilcisplatinresistantesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT shimadahideaki randomizedphaseiistudytocomparingdocetaxelnedaplatinversusdocetaxelfor5fluorouracilcisplatinresistantesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma