Cargando…

Correcting for enzyme immunoassay changes in long term monitoring studies

Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) are a common tool for measuring steroid hormones in wildlife due to their low cost, commercial availability, and rapid results. Testing technologies improve continuously, sometimes requiring changes in protocols or crucial assay components. Antibody replacement between EIA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Abbey E., Sergiel, Agnieszka, Selva, Nuria, Swenson, Jon E., Zedrosser, Andreas, Stenhouse, Gordon, Janz, David M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8374155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101212
_version_ 1783740054923902976
author Wilson, Abbey E.
Sergiel, Agnieszka
Selva, Nuria
Swenson, Jon E.
Zedrosser, Andreas
Stenhouse, Gordon
Janz, David M.
author_facet Wilson, Abbey E.
Sergiel, Agnieszka
Selva, Nuria
Swenson, Jon E.
Zedrosser, Andreas
Stenhouse, Gordon
Janz, David M.
author_sort Wilson, Abbey E.
collection PubMed
description Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) are a common tool for measuring steroid hormones in wildlife due to their low cost, commercial availability, and rapid results. Testing technologies improve continuously, sometimes requiring changes in protocols or crucial assay components. Antibody replacement between EIA kits can cause differences in EIA sensitivity, which can hinder monitoring hormone concentration over time. The antibody in a common cortisol EIA kit used for long-term monitoring of stress in wildlife was replaced in 2014, causing differences in cross reactivity and standard curve concentrations. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop a method to standardize results following changes in EIA sensitivity. We validated this method using cortisol concentrations measured in the hair of brown bears (Ursus arctos). • We used a simple linear regression to model the relationship between cortisol concentrations using kit 1 and kit 2. • We found a linear relationship between the two kits (R(2) = 0.85) and used the regression equation (kit2 = (0.98 × kit1) + 1.65) to predict cortisol concentrations in re-measured samples. • Mean predicted percent error was 16% and 72% of samples had a predicted percent error <20%, suggesting that this method is well-suited for correcting changes in EIA sensitivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8374155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83741552021-08-24 Correcting for enzyme immunoassay changes in long term monitoring studies Wilson, Abbey E. Sergiel, Agnieszka Selva, Nuria Swenson, Jon E. Zedrosser, Andreas Stenhouse, Gordon Janz, David M. MethodsX Method Article Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) are a common tool for measuring steroid hormones in wildlife due to their low cost, commercial availability, and rapid results. Testing technologies improve continuously, sometimes requiring changes in protocols or crucial assay components. Antibody replacement between EIA kits can cause differences in EIA sensitivity, which can hinder monitoring hormone concentration over time. The antibody in a common cortisol EIA kit used for long-term monitoring of stress in wildlife was replaced in 2014, causing differences in cross reactivity and standard curve concentrations. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop a method to standardize results following changes in EIA sensitivity. We validated this method using cortisol concentrations measured in the hair of brown bears (Ursus arctos). • We used a simple linear regression to model the relationship between cortisol concentrations using kit 1 and kit 2. • We found a linear relationship between the two kits (R(2) = 0.85) and used the regression equation (kit2 = (0.98 × kit1) + 1.65) to predict cortisol concentrations in re-measured samples. • Mean predicted percent error was 16% and 72% of samples had a predicted percent error <20%, suggesting that this method is well-suited for correcting changes in EIA sensitivity. Elsevier 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8374155/ /pubmed/34434735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101212 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Method Article
Wilson, Abbey E.
Sergiel, Agnieszka
Selva, Nuria
Swenson, Jon E.
Zedrosser, Andreas
Stenhouse, Gordon
Janz, David M.
Correcting for enzyme immunoassay changes in long term monitoring studies
title Correcting for enzyme immunoassay changes in long term monitoring studies
title_full Correcting for enzyme immunoassay changes in long term monitoring studies
title_fullStr Correcting for enzyme immunoassay changes in long term monitoring studies
title_full_unstemmed Correcting for enzyme immunoassay changes in long term monitoring studies
title_short Correcting for enzyme immunoassay changes in long term monitoring studies
title_sort correcting for enzyme immunoassay changes in long term monitoring studies
topic Method Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8374155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101212
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonabbeye correctingforenzymeimmunoassaychangesinlongtermmonitoringstudies
AT sergielagnieszka correctingforenzymeimmunoassaychangesinlongtermmonitoringstudies
AT selvanuria correctingforenzymeimmunoassaychangesinlongtermmonitoringstudies
AT swensonjone correctingforenzymeimmunoassaychangesinlongtermmonitoringstudies
AT zedrosserandreas correctingforenzymeimmunoassaychangesinlongtermmonitoringstudies
AT stenhousegordon correctingforenzymeimmunoassaychangesinlongtermmonitoringstudies
AT janzdavidm correctingforenzymeimmunoassaychangesinlongtermmonitoringstudies