Cargando…
Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and quantification of osteoclasts
Quantification of osteoclasts to assess bone resorption is a time-consuming and tedious process. Since the inception of bone histomorphometry and manual counting of osteoclasts using bright-field microscopy, several approaches have been proposed to accelerate the counting process using both free and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8374260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101272 |
_version_ | 1783740077531201536 |
---|---|
author | Emmanuel, Thomas Brüel, Annemarie Thomsen, Jesper Skovhus Steiniche, Torben Brent, Mikkel Bo |
author_facet | Emmanuel, Thomas Brüel, Annemarie Thomsen, Jesper Skovhus Steiniche, Torben Brent, Mikkel Bo |
author_sort | Emmanuel, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quantification of osteoclasts to assess bone resorption is a time-consuming and tedious process. Since the inception of bone histomorphometry and manual counting of osteoclasts using bright-field microscopy, several approaches have been proposed to accelerate the counting process using both free and commercially available software. However, most of the present alternatives depend on manual or semi-automatic color segmentation and do not take advantage of artificial intelligence (AI). The present study directly compare estimates of osteoclast-covered surfaces (Oc.S/BS) obtained by the conventional manual method using a bright-field microscope to that obtained by a new AI-assisted method. We present a detailed step-by-step guide for the AI-based method. Tibiae from Wistar rats were either enzymatically stained for TRAP or immunostained for cathepsin K to identify osteoclasts. We found that estimation of Oc.S/BS by the new AI-assisted method was considerably less time-consuming, while still providing similar results to the conventional manual method. In addition, the retrainable AI-module used in the present study allows for fully automated overnight batch processing of multiple annotated sections. • Bone histomorphometry; • AI-assisted osteoclast identification; • TRAP and cathepsin K. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8374260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83742602021-08-24 Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and quantification of osteoclasts Emmanuel, Thomas Brüel, Annemarie Thomsen, Jesper Skovhus Steiniche, Torben Brent, Mikkel Bo MethodsX Method Article Quantification of osteoclasts to assess bone resorption is a time-consuming and tedious process. Since the inception of bone histomorphometry and manual counting of osteoclasts using bright-field microscopy, several approaches have been proposed to accelerate the counting process using both free and commercially available software. However, most of the present alternatives depend on manual or semi-automatic color segmentation and do not take advantage of artificial intelligence (AI). The present study directly compare estimates of osteoclast-covered surfaces (Oc.S/BS) obtained by the conventional manual method using a bright-field microscope to that obtained by a new AI-assisted method. We present a detailed step-by-step guide for the AI-based method. Tibiae from Wistar rats were either enzymatically stained for TRAP or immunostained for cathepsin K to identify osteoclasts. We found that estimation of Oc.S/BS by the new AI-assisted method was considerably less time-consuming, while still providing similar results to the conventional manual method. In addition, the retrainable AI-module used in the present study allows for fully automated overnight batch processing of multiple annotated sections. • Bone histomorphometry; • AI-assisted osteoclast identification; • TRAP and cathepsin K. Elsevier 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8374260/ /pubmed/34434793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101272 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Method Article Emmanuel, Thomas Brüel, Annemarie Thomsen, Jesper Skovhus Steiniche, Torben Brent, Mikkel Bo Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and quantification of osteoclasts |
title | Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and quantification of osteoclasts |
title_full | Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and quantification of osteoclasts |
title_fullStr | Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and quantification of osteoclasts |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and quantification of osteoclasts |
title_short | Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and quantification of osteoclasts |
title_sort | artificial intelligence-assisted identification and quantification of osteoclasts |
topic | Method Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8374260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101272 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT emmanuelthomas artificialintelligenceassistedidentificationandquantificationofosteoclasts AT bruelannemarie artificialintelligenceassistedidentificationandquantificationofosteoclasts AT thomsenjesperskovhus artificialintelligenceassistedidentificationandquantificationofosteoclasts AT steinichetorben artificialintelligenceassistedidentificationandquantificationofosteoclasts AT brentmikkelbo artificialintelligenceassistedidentificationandquantificationofosteoclasts |