Cargando…

Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and quantification of osteoclasts

Quantification of osteoclasts to assess bone resorption is a time-consuming and tedious process. Since the inception of bone histomorphometry and manual counting of osteoclasts using bright-field microscopy, several approaches have been proposed to accelerate the counting process using both free and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emmanuel, Thomas, Brüel, Annemarie, Thomsen, Jesper Skovhus, Steiniche, Torben, Brent, Mikkel Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8374260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101272
_version_ 1783740077531201536
author Emmanuel, Thomas
Brüel, Annemarie
Thomsen, Jesper Skovhus
Steiniche, Torben
Brent, Mikkel Bo
author_facet Emmanuel, Thomas
Brüel, Annemarie
Thomsen, Jesper Skovhus
Steiniche, Torben
Brent, Mikkel Bo
author_sort Emmanuel, Thomas
collection PubMed
description Quantification of osteoclasts to assess bone resorption is a time-consuming and tedious process. Since the inception of bone histomorphometry and manual counting of osteoclasts using bright-field microscopy, several approaches have been proposed to accelerate the counting process using both free and commercially available software. However, most of the present alternatives depend on manual or semi-automatic color segmentation and do not take advantage of artificial intelligence (AI). The present study directly compare estimates of osteoclast-covered surfaces (Oc.S/BS) obtained by the conventional manual method using a bright-field microscope to that obtained by a new AI-assisted method. We present a detailed step-by-step guide for the AI-based method. Tibiae from Wistar rats were either enzymatically stained for TRAP or immunostained for cathepsin K to identify osteoclasts. We found that estimation of Oc.S/BS by the new AI-assisted method was considerably less time-consuming, while still providing similar results to the conventional manual method. In addition, the retrainable AI-module used in the present study allows for fully automated overnight batch processing of multiple annotated sections. • Bone histomorphometry; • AI-assisted osteoclast identification; • TRAP and cathepsin K.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8374260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83742602021-08-24 Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and quantification of osteoclasts Emmanuel, Thomas Brüel, Annemarie Thomsen, Jesper Skovhus Steiniche, Torben Brent, Mikkel Bo MethodsX Method Article Quantification of osteoclasts to assess bone resorption is a time-consuming and tedious process. Since the inception of bone histomorphometry and manual counting of osteoclasts using bright-field microscopy, several approaches have been proposed to accelerate the counting process using both free and commercially available software. However, most of the present alternatives depend on manual or semi-automatic color segmentation and do not take advantage of artificial intelligence (AI). The present study directly compare estimates of osteoclast-covered surfaces (Oc.S/BS) obtained by the conventional manual method using a bright-field microscope to that obtained by a new AI-assisted method. We present a detailed step-by-step guide for the AI-based method. Tibiae from Wistar rats were either enzymatically stained for TRAP or immunostained for cathepsin K to identify osteoclasts. We found that estimation of Oc.S/BS by the new AI-assisted method was considerably less time-consuming, while still providing similar results to the conventional manual method. In addition, the retrainable AI-module used in the present study allows for fully automated overnight batch processing of multiple annotated sections. • Bone histomorphometry; • AI-assisted osteoclast identification; • TRAP and cathepsin K. Elsevier 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8374260/ /pubmed/34434793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101272 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Method Article
Emmanuel, Thomas
Brüel, Annemarie
Thomsen, Jesper Skovhus
Steiniche, Torben
Brent, Mikkel Bo
Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and quantification of osteoclasts
title Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and quantification of osteoclasts
title_full Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and quantification of osteoclasts
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and quantification of osteoclasts
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and quantification of osteoclasts
title_short Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and quantification of osteoclasts
title_sort artificial intelligence-assisted identification and quantification of osteoclasts
topic Method Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8374260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101272
work_keys_str_mv AT emmanuelthomas artificialintelligenceassistedidentificationandquantificationofosteoclasts
AT bruelannemarie artificialintelligenceassistedidentificationandquantificationofosteoclasts
AT thomsenjesperskovhus artificialintelligenceassistedidentificationandquantificationofosteoclasts
AT steinichetorben artificialintelligenceassistedidentificationandquantificationofosteoclasts
AT brentmikkelbo artificialintelligenceassistedidentificationandquantificationofosteoclasts