Cargando…

Differences in Multimodal Electroencephalogram and Clinical Correlations Between Early-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are the two main types of dementia. We investigated the electroencephalogram (EEG) difference and clinical correlation in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD), and FTD using multimodal EEG analyses. EOAD had more severe EEG abn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Nan, Gao, Jing, Mao, Chenhui, Sun, Heyang, Lu, Qiang, Cui, Liying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8374312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34421518
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.687053
_version_ 1783740089135792128
author Lin, Nan
Gao, Jing
Mao, Chenhui
Sun, Heyang
Lu, Qiang
Cui, Liying
author_facet Lin, Nan
Gao, Jing
Mao, Chenhui
Sun, Heyang
Lu, Qiang
Cui, Liying
author_sort Lin, Nan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are the two main types of dementia. We investigated the electroencephalogram (EEG) difference and clinical correlation in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD), and FTD using multimodal EEG analyses. EOAD had more severe EEG abnormalities than late-onset AD (LOAD). Group comparisons between EOAD and LOAD were also performed. METHODS: Thirty patients diagnosed with EOAD, nine patients with LOAD, and 14 patients with FTD (≤65 y) were recruited (2008.1–2020.2), along with 24 healthy controls (≤65 y, n = 18; >65 y, n = 6). Clinical data were reviewed. Visual EEG, EEG microstate, and spectral analyses were performed. RESULTS: Compared to controls, markedly increased mean microstate duration, reduced mean occurrence, and reduced global field power (GFP) peaks per second were observed in EOAD and FTD. We found increased durations of class B in EOAD and class A in FTD. EOAD had reduced occurrences in classes A, B, and C, while only class C occurrence was reduced in FTD. The visual EEG results did not differ between AD and FTD. Microstate B showed correlations with activities of daily living score (r = 0.780, p = 0.008) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42 (r = −0.833, p = 0.010) in EOAD. Microstate D occurrence was correlated with the CSF Aβ42 level in FTD (r = 0.786, p = 0.021). Spectral analysis revealed a general slowing EEG, which may contribute to microstate dynamic loss. Power in delta was significantly higher in EOAD than in FTD all over the head. In addition, EOAD had a marked increased duration and decreased occurrence than late-onset AD (LOAD), with no group differences in visual EEG results. CONCLUSION: The current study found that EOAD and FTD had different EEG changes, and microstate had an association with clinical severity and CSF biomarkers. EEG microstate is more sensitive than visual EEG and may be useful for the differentiation between AD and FTD. The observations support that EEG can be a potential biomarker for the diagnosis and assessment of early-onset dementias.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8374312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83743122021-08-20 Differences in Multimodal Electroencephalogram and Clinical Correlations Between Early-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia Lin, Nan Gao, Jing Mao, Chenhui Sun, Heyang Lu, Qiang Cui, Liying Front Neurosci Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are the two main types of dementia. We investigated the electroencephalogram (EEG) difference and clinical correlation in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD), and FTD using multimodal EEG analyses. EOAD had more severe EEG abnormalities than late-onset AD (LOAD). Group comparisons between EOAD and LOAD were also performed. METHODS: Thirty patients diagnosed with EOAD, nine patients with LOAD, and 14 patients with FTD (≤65 y) were recruited (2008.1–2020.2), along with 24 healthy controls (≤65 y, n = 18; >65 y, n = 6). Clinical data were reviewed. Visual EEG, EEG microstate, and spectral analyses were performed. RESULTS: Compared to controls, markedly increased mean microstate duration, reduced mean occurrence, and reduced global field power (GFP) peaks per second were observed in EOAD and FTD. We found increased durations of class B in EOAD and class A in FTD. EOAD had reduced occurrences in classes A, B, and C, while only class C occurrence was reduced in FTD. The visual EEG results did not differ between AD and FTD. Microstate B showed correlations with activities of daily living score (r = 0.780, p = 0.008) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42 (r = −0.833, p = 0.010) in EOAD. Microstate D occurrence was correlated with the CSF Aβ42 level in FTD (r = 0.786, p = 0.021). Spectral analysis revealed a general slowing EEG, which may contribute to microstate dynamic loss. Power in delta was significantly higher in EOAD than in FTD all over the head. In addition, EOAD had a marked increased duration and decreased occurrence than late-onset AD (LOAD), with no group differences in visual EEG results. CONCLUSION: The current study found that EOAD and FTD had different EEG changes, and microstate had an association with clinical severity and CSF biomarkers. EEG microstate is more sensitive than visual EEG and may be useful for the differentiation between AD and FTD. The observations support that EEG can be a potential biomarker for the diagnosis and assessment of early-onset dementias. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8374312/ /pubmed/34421518 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.687053 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lin, Gao, Mao, Sun, Lu and Cui. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Lin, Nan
Gao, Jing
Mao, Chenhui
Sun, Heyang
Lu, Qiang
Cui, Liying
Differences in Multimodal Electroencephalogram and Clinical Correlations Between Early-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia
title Differences in Multimodal Electroencephalogram and Clinical Correlations Between Early-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia
title_full Differences in Multimodal Electroencephalogram and Clinical Correlations Between Early-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia
title_fullStr Differences in Multimodal Electroencephalogram and Clinical Correlations Between Early-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Multimodal Electroencephalogram and Clinical Correlations Between Early-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia
title_short Differences in Multimodal Electroencephalogram and Clinical Correlations Between Early-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia
title_sort differences in multimodal electroencephalogram and clinical correlations between early-onset alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8374312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34421518
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.687053
work_keys_str_mv AT linnan differencesinmultimodalelectroencephalogramandclinicalcorrelationsbetweenearlyonsetalzheimersdiseaseandfrontotemporaldementia
AT gaojing differencesinmultimodalelectroencephalogramandclinicalcorrelationsbetweenearlyonsetalzheimersdiseaseandfrontotemporaldementia
AT maochenhui differencesinmultimodalelectroencephalogramandclinicalcorrelationsbetweenearlyonsetalzheimersdiseaseandfrontotemporaldementia
AT sunheyang differencesinmultimodalelectroencephalogramandclinicalcorrelationsbetweenearlyonsetalzheimersdiseaseandfrontotemporaldementia
AT luqiang differencesinmultimodalelectroencephalogramandclinicalcorrelationsbetweenearlyonsetalzheimersdiseaseandfrontotemporaldementia
AT cuiliying differencesinmultimodalelectroencephalogramandclinicalcorrelationsbetweenearlyonsetalzheimersdiseaseandfrontotemporaldementia