Cargando…
The ethics of machine learning-based clinical decision support: an analysis through the lens of professionalisation theory
BACKGROUND: Machine learning-based clinical decision support systems (ML_CDSS) are increasingly employed in various sectors of health care aiming at supporting clinicians’ practice by matching the characteristics of individual patients with a computerised clinical knowledge base. Some studies even i...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34412649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00679-3 |
_version_ | 1783740256227426304 |
---|---|
author | Heyen, Nils B. Salloch, Sabine |
author_facet | Heyen, Nils B. Salloch, Sabine |
author_sort | Heyen, Nils B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Machine learning-based clinical decision support systems (ML_CDSS) are increasingly employed in various sectors of health care aiming at supporting clinicians’ practice by matching the characteristics of individual patients with a computerised clinical knowledge base. Some studies even indicate that ML_CDSS may surpass physicians’ competencies regarding specific isolated tasks. From an ethical perspective, however, the usage of ML_CDSS in medical practice touches on a range of fundamental normative issues. This article aims to add to the ethical discussion by using professionalisation theory as an analytical lens for investigating how medical action at the micro level and the physician–patient relationship might be affected by the employment of ML_CDSS. MAIN TEXT: Professionalisation theory, as a distinct sociological framework, provides an elaborated account of what constitutes client-related professional action, such as medical action, at its core and why it is more than pure expertise-based action. Professionalisation theory is introduced by presenting five general structural features of professionalised medical practice: (i) the patient has a concern; (ii) the physician deals with the patient’s concern; (iii) s/he gives assistance without patronising; (iv) s/he regards the patient in a holistic manner without building up a private relationship; and (v) s/he applies her/his general expertise to the particularities of the individual case. Each of these five key aspects are then analysed regarding the usage of ML_CDSS, thereby integrating the perspectives of professionalisation theory and medical ethics. CONCLUSIONS: Using ML_CDSS in medical practice requires the physician to pay special attention to those facts of the individual case that cannot be comprehensively considered by ML_CDSS, for example, the patient’s personality, life situation or cultural background. Moreover, the more routinized the use of ML_CDSS becomes in clinical practice, the more that physicians need to focus on the patient’s concern and strengthen patient autonomy, for instance, by adequately integrating digital decision support in shared decision-making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8375118 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83751182021-08-19 The ethics of machine learning-based clinical decision support: an analysis through the lens of professionalisation theory Heyen, Nils B. Salloch, Sabine BMC Med Ethics Debate BACKGROUND: Machine learning-based clinical decision support systems (ML_CDSS) are increasingly employed in various sectors of health care aiming at supporting clinicians’ practice by matching the characteristics of individual patients with a computerised clinical knowledge base. Some studies even indicate that ML_CDSS may surpass physicians’ competencies regarding specific isolated tasks. From an ethical perspective, however, the usage of ML_CDSS in medical practice touches on a range of fundamental normative issues. This article aims to add to the ethical discussion by using professionalisation theory as an analytical lens for investigating how medical action at the micro level and the physician–patient relationship might be affected by the employment of ML_CDSS. MAIN TEXT: Professionalisation theory, as a distinct sociological framework, provides an elaborated account of what constitutes client-related professional action, such as medical action, at its core and why it is more than pure expertise-based action. Professionalisation theory is introduced by presenting five general structural features of professionalised medical practice: (i) the patient has a concern; (ii) the physician deals with the patient’s concern; (iii) s/he gives assistance without patronising; (iv) s/he regards the patient in a holistic manner without building up a private relationship; and (v) s/he applies her/his general expertise to the particularities of the individual case. Each of these five key aspects are then analysed regarding the usage of ML_CDSS, thereby integrating the perspectives of professionalisation theory and medical ethics. CONCLUSIONS: Using ML_CDSS in medical practice requires the physician to pay special attention to those facts of the individual case that cannot be comprehensively considered by ML_CDSS, for example, the patient’s personality, life situation or cultural background. Moreover, the more routinized the use of ML_CDSS becomes in clinical practice, the more that physicians need to focus on the patient’s concern and strengthen patient autonomy, for instance, by adequately integrating digital decision support in shared decision-making. BioMed Central 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8375118/ /pubmed/34412649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00679-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Debate Heyen, Nils B. Salloch, Sabine The ethics of machine learning-based clinical decision support: an analysis through the lens of professionalisation theory |
title | The ethics of machine learning-based clinical decision support: an analysis through the lens of professionalisation theory |
title_full | The ethics of machine learning-based clinical decision support: an analysis through the lens of professionalisation theory |
title_fullStr | The ethics of machine learning-based clinical decision support: an analysis through the lens of professionalisation theory |
title_full_unstemmed | The ethics of machine learning-based clinical decision support: an analysis through the lens of professionalisation theory |
title_short | The ethics of machine learning-based clinical decision support: an analysis through the lens of professionalisation theory |
title_sort | ethics of machine learning-based clinical decision support: an analysis through the lens of professionalisation theory |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34412649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00679-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heyennilsb theethicsofmachinelearningbasedclinicaldecisionsupportananalysisthroughthelensofprofessionalisationtheory AT sallochsabine theethicsofmachinelearningbasedclinicaldecisionsupportananalysisthroughthelensofprofessionalisationtheory AT heyennilsb ethicsofmachinelearningbasedclinicaldecisionsupportananalysisthroughthelensofprofessionalisationtheory AT sallochsabine ethicsofmachinelearningbasedclinicaldecisionsupportananalysisthroughthelensofprofessionalisationtheory |