Cargando…

The ability of comorbidity indices to predict mortality in an orthopedic setting: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Several comorbidity indices have been created to estimate and adjust for the burden of comorbidity. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate and compare the ability of different comorbidity indices to predict mortality in an orthopedic setting. METHODS: A systematic search...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gundtoft, Per Hviid, Jørstad, Mari, Erichsen, Julie Ladeby, Schmal, Hagen, Viberg, Bjarke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34407872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01785-4
_version_ 1783740265835528192
author Gundtoft, Per Hviid
Jørstad, Mari
Erichsen, Julie Ladeby
Schmal, Hagen
Viberg, Bjarke
author_facet Gundtoft, Per Hviid
Jørstad, Mari
Erichsen, Julie Ladeby
Schmal, Hagen
Viberg, Bjarke
author_sort Gundtoft, Per Hviid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several comorbidity indices have been created to estimate and adjust for the burden of comorbidity. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate and compare the ability of different comorbidity indices to predict mortality in an orthopedic setting. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library. The search were constructed around two primary focal points: a comorbidity index and orthopedics. The last search were performed on 13 June 2019. Eligibility criteria were participants with orthopedic conditions or who underwent an orthopedic procedure, a comparison between comorbidity indices that used administrative data, and reported mortality as outcome. Two independent reviewers screened the studies using Covidence. The area under the curve (AUC) was chosen as the primary effect estimate. RESULTS: Of the 5338 studies identified, 16 met the eligibility criteria. The predictive ability of the different comorbidity indices ranged from poor (AUC < 0.70) to excellent (AUC ≥ 0.90). The majority of the included studies compared the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). In-hospital mortality was reported in eight studies reporting AUC values ranging from 0.70 to 0.92 for ECI and 0.68 to 0.89 for CCI. AUC values were generally lower for all other time points ranging from 0.67 to 0.78. For 1-year mortality the overall effect size ranging from 0.67 to 0.77 for ECI and 0.69 to 0.77 for CCI. CONCLUSION: The results of this review indicate that the ECI and CCI can equally be used to adjust for comorbidities when analyzing mortality in an orthopedic setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol for this systematic review was registered on PROSPERO, the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on 13 June 2019 and can be accessed through record ID 133,871. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01785-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8375166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83751662021-08-19 The ability of comorbidity indices to predict mortality in an orthopedic setting: a systematic review Gundtoft, Per Hviid Jørstad, Mari Erichsen, Julie Ladeby Schmal, Hagen Viberg, Bjarke Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Several comorbidity indices have been created to estimate and adjust for the burden of comorbidity. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate and compare the ability of different comorbidity indices to predict mortality in an orthopedic setting. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library. The search were constructed around two primary focal points: a comorbidity index and orthopedics. The last search were performed on 13 June 2019. Eligibility criteria were participants with orthopedic conditions or who underwent an orthopedic procedure, a comparison between comorbidity indices that used administrative data, and reported mortality as outcome. Two independent reviewers screened the studies using Covidence. The area under the curve (AUC) was chosen as the primary effect estimate. RESULTS: Of the 5338 studies identified, 16 met the eligibility criteria. The predictive ability of the different comorbidity indices ranged from poor (AUC < 0.70) to excellent (AUC ≥ 0.90). The majority of the included studies compared the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). In-hospital mortality was reported in eight studies reporting AUC values ranging from 0.70 to 0.92 for ECI and 0.68 to 0.89 for CCI. AUC values were generally lower for all other time points ranging from 0.67 to 0.78. For 1-year mortality the overall effect size ranging from 0.67 to 0.77 for ECI and 0.69 to 0.77 for CCI. CONCLUSION: The results of this review indicate that the ECI and CCI can equally be used to adjust for comorbidities when analyzing mortality in an orthopedic setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol for this systematic review was registered on PROSPERO, the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on 13 June 2019 and can be accessed through record ID 133,871. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01785-4. BioMed Central 2021-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8375166/ /pubmed/34407872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01785-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gundtoft, Per Hviid
Jørstad, Mari
Erichsen, Julie Ladeby
Schmal, Hagen
Viberg, Bjarke
The ability of comorbidity indices to predict mortality in an orthopedic setting: a systematic review
title The ability of comorbidity indices to predict mortality in an orthopedic setting: a systematic review
title_full The ability of comorbidity indices to predict mortality in an orthopedic setting: a systematic review
title_fullStr The ability of comorbidity indices to predict mortality in an orthopedic setting: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The ability of comorbidity indices to predict mortality in an orthopedic setting: a systematic review
title_short The ability of comorbidity indices to predict mortality in an orthopedic setting: a systematic review
title_sort ability of comorbidity indices to predict mortality in an orthopedic setting: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34407872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01785-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gundtoftperhviid theabilityofcomorbidityindicestopredictmortalityinanorthopedicsettingasystematicreview
AT jørstadmari theabilityofcomorbidityindicestopredictmortalityinanorthopedicsettingasystematicreview
AT erichsenjulieladeby theabilityofcomorbidityindicestopredictmortalityinanorthopedicsettingasystematicreview
AT schmalhagen theabilityofcomorbidityindicestopredictmortalityinanorthopedicsettingasystematicreview
AT vibergbjarke theabilityofcomorbidityindicestopredictmortalityinanorthopedicsettingasystematicreview
AT gundtoftperhviid abilityofcomorbidityindicestopredictmortalityinanorthopedicsettingasystematicreview
AT jørstadmari abilityofcomorbidityindicestopredictmortalityinanorthopedicsettingasystematicreview
AT erichsenjulieladeby abilityofcomorbidityindicestopredictmortalityinanorthopedicsettingasystematicreview
AT schmalhagen abilityofcomorbidityindicestopredictmortalityinanorthopedicsettingasystematicreview
AT vibergbjarke abilityofcomorbidityindicestopredictmortalityinanorthopedicsettingasystematicreview