Cargando…

Interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis: scoping review

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this scoping review was to identify pre-existing interventions to support the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis and to assess the quality of these interventions. DESIGN: Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage scoping review framework was used to iden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cairns, Patrick, Aitken, Gill, Pope, Lindsey Margaret, Cecil, Joanne E, Cunningham, Kathryn B, Ferguson, Julie, Gibson Smith, Katie, Gordon, Lisi, Johnston, Peter, Laidlaw, Anita, Scanlan, Gillian Marion, Tooman, Tricia R, Wakeling, Judy, Walker, Kim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34404701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047498
_version_ 1783740316231139328
author Cairns, Patrick
Aitken, Gill
Pope, Lindsey Margaret
Cecil, Joanne E
Cunningham, Kathryn B
Ferguson, Julie
Gibson Smith, Katie
Gordon, Lisi
Johnston, Peter
Laidlaw, Anita
Scanlan, Gillian Marion
Tooman, Tricia R
Wakeling, Judy
Walker, Kim
author_facet Cairns, Patrick
Aitken, Gill
Pope, Lindsey Margaret
Cecil, Joanne E
Cunningham, Kathryn B
Ferguson, Julie
Gibson Smith, Katie
Gordon, Lisi
Johnston, Peter
Laidlaw, Anita
Scanlan, Gillian Marion
Tooman, Tricia R
Wakeling, Judy
Walker, Kim
author_sort Cairns, Patrick
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this scoping review was to identify pre-existing interventions to support the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis and to assess the quality of these interventions. DESIGN: Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage scoping review framework was used to identify the types of evidence available in the field of well-being interventions for healthcare workers during a pandemic. PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and ERIC databases were searched to find interventions for the well-being of doctors during pandemics. Owing to a lack of results, this search was expanded to all healthcare workers and to include any crisis. Databases were searched in June 2020 and again in October 2020. INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Articles were included that studied healthcare workers, reported an intervention design and were specifically designed for use during a pandemic or other crisis. Well-being was defined broadly and could include psychological, physical, social or educational interventions. RESULTS: Searching produced 10 529 total academic references of which 2062 were duplicates. This left 8467 references. Of these, 16 met our inclusion criteria and were included in data extraction. During data extraction, three more papers were excluded. This left 13 papers to summarise and report. Of these 13 papers, 6 were prospective studies and 7 were purely descriptive. None of the interventions were theoretically informed in their development and the quality of the evidence was generally deemed poor. CONCLUSIONS: There are no high-quality, theory-based interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis. Given that previous pandemics have been shown to have a negative effect on healthcare workers well-being, it is imperative this shortcoming is addressed. This scoping review highlights the need for high-quality, theory-based and evidence-based interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8375449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83754492021-08-20 Interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis: scoping review Cairns, Patrick Aitken, Gill Pope, Lindsey Margaret Cecil, Joanne E Cunningham, Kathryn B Ferguson, Julie Gibson Smith, Katie Gordon, Lisi Johnston, Peter Laidlaw, Anita Scanlan, Gillian Marion Tooman, Tricia R Wakeling, Judy Walker, Kim BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVES: The aim of this scoping review was to identify pre-existing interventions to support the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis and to assess the quality of these interventions. DESIGN: Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage scoping review framework was used to identify the types of evidence available in the field of well-being interventions for healthcare workers during a pandemic. PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and ERIC databases were searched to find interventions for the well-being of doctors during pandemics. Owing to a lack of results, this search was expanded to all healthcare workers and to include any crisis. Databases were searched in June 2020 and again in October 2020. INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Articles were included that studied healthcare workers, reported an intervention design and were specifically designed for use during a pandemic or other crisis. Well-being was defined broadly and could include psychological, physical, social or educational interventions. RESULTS: Searching produced 10 529 total academic references of which 2062 were duplicates. This left 8467 references. Of these, 16 met our inclusion criteria and were included in data extraction. During data extraction, three more papers were excluded. This left 13 papers to summarise and report. Of these 13 papers, 6 were prospective studies and 7 were purely descriptive. None of the interventions were theoretically informed in their development and the quality of the evidence was generally deemed poor. CONCLUSIONS: There are no high-quality, theory-based interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis. Given that previous pandemics have been shown to have a negative effect on healthcare workers well-being, it is imperative this shortcoming is addressed. This scoping review highlights the need for high-quality, theory-based and evidence-based interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8375449/ /pubmed/34404701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047498 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
Cairns, Patrick
Aitken, Gill
Pope, Lindsey Margaret
Cecil, Joanne E
Cunningham, Kathryn B
Ferguson, Julie
Gibson Smith, Katie
Gordon, Lisi
Johnston, Peter
Laidlaw, Anita
Scanlan, Gillian Marion
Tooman, Tricia R
Wakeling, Judy
Walker, Kim
Interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis: scoping review
title Interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis: scoping review
title_full Interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis: scoping review
title_fullStr Interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis: scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis: scoping review
title_short Interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis: scoping review
title_sort interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis: scoping review
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34404701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047498
work_keys_str_mv AT cairnspatrick interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview
AT aitkengill interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview
AT popelindseymargaret interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview
AT ceciljoannee interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview
AT cunninghamkathrynb interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview
AT fergusonjulie interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview
AT gibsonsmithkatie interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview
AT gordonlisi interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview
AT johnstonpeter interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview
AT laidlawanita interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview
AT scanlangillianmarion interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview
AT toomantriciar interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview
AT wakelingjudy interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview
AT walkerkim interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview