Cargando…
Interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis: scoping review
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this scoping review was to identify pre-existing interventions to support the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis and to assess the quality of these interventions. DESIGN: Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage scoping review framework was used to iden...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34404701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047498 |
_version_ | 1783740316231139328 |
---|---|
author | Cairns, Patrick Aitken, Gill Pope, Lindsey Margaret Cecil, Joanne E Cunningham, Kathryn B Ferguson, Julie Gibson Smith, Katie Gordon, Lisi Johnston, Peter Laidlaw, Anita Scanlan, Gillian Marion Tooman, Tricia R Wakeling, Judy Walker, Kim |
author_facet | Cairns, Patrick Aitken, Gill Pope, Lindsey Margaret Cecil, Joanne E Cunningham, Kathryn B Ferguson, Julie Gibson Smith, Katie Gordon, Lisi Johnston, Peter Laidlaw, Anita Scanlan, Gillian Marion Tooman, Tricia R Wakeling, Judy Walker, Kim |
author_sort | Cairns, Patrick |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this scoping review was to identify pre-existing interventions to support the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis and to assess the quality of these interventions. DESIGN: Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage scoping review framework was used to identify the types of evidence available in the field of well-being interventions for healthcare workers during a pandemic. PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and ERIC databases were searched to find interventions for the well-being of doctors during pandemics. Owing to a lack of results, this search was expanded to all healthcare workers and to include any crisis. Databases were searched in June 2020 and again in October 2020. INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Articles were included that studied healthcare workers, reported an intervention design and were specifically designed for use during a pandemic or other crisis. Well-being was defined broadly and could include psychological, physical, social or educational interventions. RESULTS: Searching produced 10 529 total academic references of which 2062 were duplicates. This left 8467 references. Of these, 16 met our inclusion criteria and were included in data extraction. During data extraction, three more papers were excluded. This left 13 papers to summarise and report. Of these 13 papers, 6 were prospective studies and 7 were purely descriptive. None of the interventions were theoretically informed in their development and the quality of the evidence was generally deemed poor. CONCLUSIONS: There are no high-quality, theory-based interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis. Given that previous pandemics have been shown to have a negative effect on healthcare workers well-being, it is imperative this shortcoming is addressed. This scoping review highlights the need for high-quality, theory-based and evidence-based interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8375449 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83754492021-08-20 Interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis: scoping review Cairns, Patrick Aitken, Gill Pope, Lindsey Margaret Cecil, Joanne E Cunningham, Kathryn B Ferguson, Julie Gibson Smith, Katie Gordon, Lisi Johnston, Peter Laidlaw, Anita Scanlan, Gillian Marion Tooman, Tricia R Wakeling, Judy Walker, Kim BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVES: The aim of this scoping review was to identify pre-existing interventions to support the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis and to assess the quality of these interventions. DESIGN: Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage scoping review framework was used to identify the types of evidence available in the field of well-being interventions for healthcare workers during a pandemic. PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and ERIC databases were searched to find interventions for the well-being of doctors during pandemics. Owing to a lack of results, this search was expanded to all healthcare workers and to include any crisis. Databases were searched in June 2020 and again in October 2020. INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Articles were included that studied healthcare workers, reported an intervention design and were specifically designed for use during a pandemic or other crisis. Well-being was defined broadly and could include psychological, physical, social or educational interventions. RESULTS: Searching produced 10 529 total academic references of which 2062 were duplicates. This left 8467 references. Of these, 16 met our inclusion criteria and were included in data extraction. During data extraction, three more papers were excluded. This left 13 papers to summarise and report. Of these 13 papers, 6 were prospective studies and 7 were purely descriptive. None of the interventions were theoretically informed in their development and the quality of the evidence was generally deemed poor. CONCLUSIONS: There are no high-quality, theory-based interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis. Given that previous pandemics have been shown to have a negative effect on healthcare workers well-being, it is imperative this shortcoming is addressed. This scoping review highlights the need for high-quality, theory-based and evidence-based interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8375449/ /pubmed/34404701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047498 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Evidence Based Practice Cairns, Patrick Aitken, Gill Pope, Lindsey Margaret Cecil, Joanne E Cunningham, Kathryn B Ferguson, Julie Gibson Smith, Katie Gordon, Lisi Johnston, Peter Laidlaw, Anita Scanlan, Gillian Marion Tooman, Tricia R Wakeling, Judy Walker, Kim Interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis: scoping review |
title | Interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis: scoping review |
title_full | Interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis: scoping review |
title_fullStr | Interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis: scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis: scoping review |
title_short | Interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis: scoping review |
title_sort | interventions for the well-being of healthcare workers during a pandemic or other crisis: scoping review |
topic | Evidence Based Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34404701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047498 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cairnspatrick interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview AT aitkengill interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview AT popelindseymargaret interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview AT ceciljoannee interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview AT cunninghamkathrynb interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview AT fergusonjulie interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview AT gibsonsmithkatie interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview AT gordonlisi interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview AT johnstonpeter interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview AT laidlawanita interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview AT scanlangillianmarion interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview AT toomantriciar interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview AT wakelingjudy interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview AT walkerkim interventionsforthewellbeingofhealthcareworkersduringapandemicorothercrisisscopingreview |