Cargando…
Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Tuberculosis (TB) continues to be a significant health burden, most commonly affecting the lungs and referred to as pulmonary TB (PTB). Diagnostic techniques of PTB primarily rely on expectorated sputum samples. However, the diagnostic yields are often hindered due to insufficient volu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34408058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052212 |
_version_ | 1783740355992092672 |
---|---|
author | Sultana, Saima Ansar, Adnan Saif-Ur-Rahman, K M |
author_facet | Sultana, Saima Ansar, Adnan Saif-Ur-Rahman, K M |
author_sort | Sultana, Saima |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Tuberculosis (TB) continues to be a significant health burden, most commonly affecting the lungs and referred to as pulmonary TB (PTB). Diagnostic techniques of PTB primarily rely on expectorated sputum samples. However, the diagnostic yields are often hindered due to insufficient volume and quality of the sputum specimens. Moreover, some individuals are unable to provide sputum samples due to scanty sputum production or difficulty in coughing up and require an invasive procedure to obtain a respiratory sample, such as bronchoscopic or gastric aspiration. Thus, challenges in the acquisition of respiratory specimens warrant an alternate specimen. Therefore, this systematic review aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a stool specimen for the diagnosis of PTB in adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Web of Science and Cochrane database from inception to April 2021 using a comprehensive search strategy. Two reviewers will independently perform screening, data extraction and quality assessment. The risk of bias assessment and applicability of results of eligible studies will be performed using the Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Bivariate random-effects models will be performed to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio along with 95% CI of stool specimen for each reported diagnostic method against any of the reference standard test (ie, mycobacterial culture or smear microscopy or Xpert assay using respiratory specimens). Heterogeneity between studies will be assessed by I(2) statistics and Q statistic of the χ(2) test. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results will be disseminated through publishing in a peer-reviewed medical journal and public presentations in relevant national and international conferences. As this is a systematic review of publicly available data, ethics approval is not required. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021245203. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8375732 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83757322021-09-02 Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Sultana, Saima Ansar, Adnan Saif-Ur-Rahman, K M BMJ Open Infectious Diseases INTRODUCTION: Tuberculosis (TB) continues to be a significant health burden, most commonly affecting the lungs and referred to as pulmonary TB (PTB). Diagnostic techniques of PTB primarily rely on expectorated sputum samples. However, the diagnostic yields are often hindered due to insufficient volume and quality of the sputum specimens. Moreover, some individuals are unable to provide sputum samples due to scanty sputum production or difficulty in coughing up and require an invasive procedure to obtain a respiratory sample, such as bronchoscopic or gastric aspiration. Thus, challenges in the acquisition of respiratory specimens warrant an alternate specimen. Therefore, this systematic review aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a stool specimen for the diagnosis of PTB in adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Web of Science and Cochrane database from inception to April 2021 using a comprehensive search strategy. Two reviewers will independently perform screening, data extraction and quality assessment. The risk of bias assessment and applicability of results of eligible studies will be performed using the Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Bivariate random-effects models will be performed to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio along with 95% CI of stool specimen for each reported diagnostic method against any of the reference standard test (ie, mycobacterial culture or smear microscopy or Xpert assay using respiratory specimens). Heterogeneity between studies will be assessed by I(2) statistics and Q statistic of the χ(2) test. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results will be disseminated through publishing in a peer-reviewed medical journal and public presentations in relevant national and international conferences. As this is a systematic review of publicly available data, ethics approval is not required. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021245203. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8375732/ /pubmed/34408058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052212 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Infectious Diseases Sultana, Saima Ansar, Adnan Saif-Ur-Rahman, K M Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Infectious Diseases |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34408058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sultanasaima stoolspecimenfordiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisinadultsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ansaradnan stoolspecimenfordiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisinadultsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT saifurrahmankm stoolspecimenfordiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisinadultsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |