Cargando…
A Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy of 4% Articaine, 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2% Lignocaine using a Single Buccal Supraperiosteal Injection for Maxillary Tooth Extraction
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to demonstrate if articaine hydrochloride administered alone as a single buccal infiltration in maxillary tooth extraction can provide adequate palatal anesthesia as compared to buccal and palatal injection using lidocaine and bupivacaine. MATERIALS AND METHOD...
Autores principales: | Chandrasekaran, Deepak, Chinnaswami, Ravindran, Shanthi, K., Dhiravia Sargunam, A. Emmanuel, Kumar, K. Santhosh, Satheesh, Tharini |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447189 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_659_20 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Single buccal infiltration of high concentration lignocaine versus articaine in maxillary third molar surgery
por: Phyo, Hnin Ei, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Anesthetic Efficacy of Single Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine and 2% Lignocaine in Extraction of Maxillary 1(st) Molar
por: Kumar, D Prasanna, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
A Randomized Control Trial Comparing Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine with Buccal and Palatal Infiltration of 2% Lignocaine for the Extraction of Maxillary Premolar Teeth
por: Sandilya, Vikas, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Efficacy of 4% articaine hydrochloride and 2% lignocaine hydrochloride in the extraction of maxillary premolars for orthodontic reasons
por: Hassan, Shahid, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
A Comparative Evaluation of Anesthetic Effectiveness of 4% Articaine vs 0.5% Bupivacaine for Lower Molar Tooth Extraction
por: Tenglikar, Pavan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)