Cargando…

Disinfection of Impression Materials with Glutaraldehyde, Ultraviolet Radiation, and Autoclave: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND: The present study was conducted to compare various methods of disinfection of impression materials such as glutaraldehyde, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and autoclave. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was conducted on eighty alginate impression materials which were disinfectant wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kotwal, Monica, Singh, Vishal Partap, Mushtaq, Humaira, Ahmed, Rimsha, Rai, Gaurav, Kumar, Amit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447095
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_755_20
_version_ 1783740386843295744
author Kotwal, Monica
Singh, Vishal Partap
Mushtaq, Humaira
Ahmed, Rimsha
Rai, Gaurav
Kumar, Amit
author_facet Kotwal, Monica
Singh, Vishal Partap
Mushtaq, Humaira
Ahmed, Rimsha
Rai, Gaurav
Kumar, Amit
author_sort Kotwal, Monica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The present study was conducted to compare various methods of disinfection of impression materials such as glutaraldehyde, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and autoclave. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was conducted on eighty alginate impression materials which were disinfectant with 2.2% glutaraldehyde, UV radiation, and autoclave. The pre- and postbacterial count was assessed. RESULTS: The mean premicrobial contamination in Group I was 362.2 106 colony-forming unit (CFU)/ml, in Group II was 306.4 106 CFU/ml, and in Group III was 336.2 106 CFU/ml. The mean postmicrobial contamination in Group I was 65.2 106 CFU/ml, in Group II was 76.7 106 CFU/ml, and in Group III was 28.4 106 CFU/ml. CONCLUSION: The authors found that autoclave proved to be better in terms of reduction in bacterial colonies as compared to glutaraldehyde and UV radiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8375875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83758752021-08-25 Disinfection of Impression Materials with Glutaraldehyde, Ultraviolet Radiation, and Autoclave: A Comparative Study Kotwal, Monica Singh, Vishal Partap Mushtaq, Humaira Ahmed, Rimsha Rai, Gaurav Kumar, Amit J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: The present study was conducted to compare various methods of disinfection of impression materials such as glutaraldehyde, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and autoclave. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was conducted on eighty alginate impression materials which were disinfectant with 2.2% glutaraldehyde, UV radiation, and autoclave. The pre- and postbacterial count was assessed. RESULTS: The mean premicrobial contamination in Group I was 362.2 106 colony-forming unit (CFU)/ml, in Group II was 306.4 106 CFU/ml, and in Group III was 336.2 106 CFU/ml. The mean postmicrobial contamination in Group I was 65.2 106 CFU/ml, in Group II was 76.7 106 CFU/ml, and in Group III was 28.4 106 CFU/ml. CONCLUSION: The authors found that autoclave proved to be better in terms of reduction in bacterial colonies as compared to glutaraldehyde and UV radiation. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-06 2021-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8375875/ /pubmed/34447095 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_755_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kotwal, Monica
Singh, Vishal Partap
Mushtaq, Humaira
Ahmed, Rimsha
Rai, Gaurav
Kumar, Amit
Disinfection of Impression Materials with Glutaraldehyde, Ultraviolet Radiation, and Autoclave: A Comparative Study
title Disinfection of Impression Materials with Glutaraldehyde, Ultraviolet Radiation, and Autoclave: A Comparative Study
title_full Disinfection of Impression Materials with Glutaraldehyde, Ultraviolet Radiation, and Autoclave: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Disinfection of Impression Materials with Glutaraldehyde, Ultraviolet Radiation, and Autoclave: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Disinfection of Impression Materials with Glutaraldehyde, Ultraviolet Radiation, and Autoclave: A Comparative Study
title_short Disinfection of Impression Materials with Glutaraldehyde, Ultraviolet Radiation, and Autoclave: A Comparative Study
title_sort disinfection of impression materials with glutaraldehyde, ultraviolet radiation, and autoclave: a comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447095
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_755_20
work_keys_str_mv AT kotwalmonica disinfectionofimpressionmaterialswithglutaraldehydeultravioletradiationandautoclaveacomparativestudy
AT singhvishalpartap disinfectionofimpressionmaterialswithglutaraldehydeultravioletradiationandautoclaveacomparativestudy
AT mushtaqhumaira disinfectionofimpressionmaterialswithglutaraldehydeultravioletradiationandautoclaveacomparativestudy
AT ahmedrimsha disinfectionofimpressionmaterialswithglutaraldehydeultravioletradiationandautoclaveacomparativestudy
AT raigaurav disinfectionofimpressionmaterialswithglutaraldehydeultravioletradiationandautoclaveacomparativestudy
AT kumaramit disinfectionofimpressionmaterialswithglutaraldehydeultravioletradiationandautoclaveacomparativestudy