Cargando…
Disinfection of Impression Materials with Glutaraldehyde, Ultraviolet Radiation, and Autoclave: A Comparative Study
BACKGROUND: The present study was conducted to compare various methods of disinfection of impression materials such as glutaraldehyde, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and autoclave. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was conducted on eighty alginate impression materials which were disinfectant wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447095 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_755_20 |
_version_ | 1783740386843295744 |
---|---|
author | Kotwal, Monica Singh, Vishal Partap Mushtaq, Humaira Ahmed, Rimsha Rai, Gaurav Kumar, Amit |
author_facet | Kotwal, Monica Singh, Vishal Partap Mushtaq, Humaira Ahmed, Rimsha Rai, Gaurav Kumar, Amit |
author_sort | Kotwal, Monica |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The present study was conducted to compare various methods of disinfection of impression materials such as glutaraldehyde, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and autoclave. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was conducted on eighty alginate impression materials which were disinfectant with 2.2% glutaraldehyde, UV radiation, and autoclave. The pre- and postbacterial count was assessed. RESULTS: The mean premicrobial contamination in Group I was 362.2 106 colony-forming unit (CFU)/ml, in Group II was 306.4 106 CFU/ml, and in Group III was 336.2 106 CFU/ml. The mean postmicrobial contamination in Group I was 65.2 106 CFU/ml, in Group II was 76.7 106 CFU/ml, and in Group III was 28.4 106 CFU/ml. CONCLUSION: The authors found that autoclave proved to be better in terms of reduction in bacterial colonies as compared to glutaraldehyde and UV radiation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8375875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83758752021-08-25 Disinfection of Impression Materials with Glutaraldehyde, Ultraviolet Radiation, and Autoclave: A Comparative Study Kotwal, Monica Singh, Vishal Partap Mushtaq, Humaira Ahmed, Rimsha Rai, Gaurav Kumar, Amit J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: The present study was conducted to compare various methods of disinfection of impression materials such as glutaraldehyde, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and autoclave. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was conducted on eighty alginate impression materials which were disinfectant with 2.2% glutaraldehyde, UV radiation, and autoclave. The pre- and postbacterial count was assessed. RESULTS: The mean premicrobial contamination in Group I was 362.2 106 colony-forming unit (CFU)/ml, in Group II was 306.4 106 CFU/ml, and in Group III was 336.2 106 CFU/ml. The mean postmicrobial contamination in Group I was 65.2 106 CFU/ml, in Group II was 76.7 106 CFU/ml, and in Group III was 28.4 106 CFU/ml. CONCLUSION: The authors found that autoclave proved to be better in terms of reduction in bacterial colonies as compared to glutaraldehyde and UV radiation. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-06 2021-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8375875/ /pubmed/34447095 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_755_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kotwal, Monica Singh, Vishal Partap Mushtaq, Humaira Ahmed, Rimsha Rai, Gaurav Kumar, Amit Disinfection of Impression Materials with Glutaraldehyde, Ultraviolet Radiation, and Autoclave: A Comparative Study |
title | Disinfection of Impression Materials with Glutaraldehyde, Ultraviolet Radiation, and Autoclave: A Comparative Study |
title_full | Disinfection of Impression Materials with Glutaraldehyde, Ultraviolet Radiation, and Autoclave: A Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | Disinfection of Impression Materials with Glutaraldehyde, Ultraviolet Radiation, and Autoclave: A Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Disinfection of Impression Materials with Glutaraldehyde, Ultraviolet Radiation, and Autoclave: A Comparative Study |
title_short | Disinfection of Impression Materials with Glutaraldehyde, Ultraviolet Radiation, and Autoclave: A Comparative Study |
title_sort | disinfection of impression materials with glutaraldehyde, ultraviolet radiation, and autoclave: a comparative study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447095 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_755_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kotwalmonica disinfectionofimpressionmaterialswithglutaraldehydeultravioletradiationandautoclaveacomparativestudy AT singhvishalpartap disinfectionofimpressionmaterialswithglutaraldehydeultravioletradiationandautoclaveacomparativestudy AT mushtaqhumaira disinfectionofimpressionmaterialswithglutaraldehydeultravioletradiationandautoclaveacomparativestudy AT ahmedrimsha disinfectionofimpressionmaterialswithglutaraldehydeultravioletradiationandautoclaveacomparativestudy AT raigaurav disinfectionofimpressionmaterialswithglutaraldehydeultravioletradiationandautoclaveacomparativestudy AT kumaramit disinfectionofimpressionmaterialswithglutaraldehydeultravioletradiationandautoclaveacomparativestudy |