Cargando…
Comparison of Sealing Ability of Bioceramic Sealer, AH Plus, and GuttaFlow in Conservatively Prepared Curved Root Canals Obturated with Single-Cone Technique: An In vitro Study
BACKGROUND: Inadequate obturation techniques of the root canal system have been found to be the most frequent reason of failure post root canal treatment. An ideal endodontic sealer should fulfill all ideal requisites. The present study aimed to compare apical sealing ability between bioceramic (BC)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447215 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_52_21 |
_version_ | 1783740392497217536 |
---|---|
author | Kaul, Shalan Kumar, Ajay Badiyani, Bhumika Kamal Sukhtankar, Laxmi Madhumitha, M. Kumar, Amit |
author_facet | Kaul, Shalan Kumar, Ajay Badiyani, Bhumika Kamal Sukhtankar, Laxmi Madhumitha, M. Kumar, Amit |
author_sort | Kaul, Shalan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Inadequate obturation techniques of the root canal system have been found to be the most frequent reason of failure post root canal treatment. An ideal endodontic sealer should fulfill all ideal requisites. The present study aimed to compare apical sealing ability between bioceramic (BC) sealer, GuttaFlow, and AH Plus. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and twenty-five curved roots of maxillary and mandibular third molar teeth with fully formed apex were collected for this study. The root canals were cleaned and shaped using a standard single-cone preparation to file at the established working length and divided into five groups of 25 each. Dye leakage was carried out. Group A: with GP, using EndoSequence BC sealer with conventional with 4% gutta-percha (Brasseler USA, Savannah, Georgia, USA); Group B: with ceramic coated with 4% gutta-percha (Brasseler USA, Savannah, Georgia, USA); Group C: with GP, using AH Plus sealer (Dentsply, De-Trey Konstanz, Germany) with 4% gutta-percha; Group D: with GuttaFlow bioseal (Roeko-Coltène/Whaledent, Langenau, Germany) with 4% Gutta-percha; and Group E is a negative control group. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software and Student's unpaired t-test. RESULTS: The group AH Plus showed more leakage values than the GuttaFlow group and of two groups of BC sealer and negative control. Student's unpaired t-test disclosed no significant difference (P < 0.05) between the groups. CONCLUSION: None of the sealers used in the study could completely seal the apical foramen to have a fluid-tight seal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8375899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83758992021-08-25 Comparison of Sealing Ability of Bioceramic Sealer, AH Plus, and GuttaFlow in Conservatively Prepared Curved Root Canals Obturated with Single-Cone Technique: An In vitro Study Kaul, Shalan Kumar, Ajay Badiyani, Bhumika Kamal Sukhtankar, Laxmi Madhumitha, M. Kumar, Amit J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Inadequate obturation techniques of the root canal system have been found to be the most frequent reason of failure post root canal treatment. An ideal endodontic sealer should fulfill all ideal requisites. The present study aimed to compare apical sealing ability between bioceramic (BC) sealer, GuttaFlow, and AH Plus. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and twenty-five curved roots of maxillary and mandibular third molar teeth with fully formed apex were collected for this study. The root canals were cleaned and shaped using a standard single-cone preparation to file at the established working length and divided into five groups of 25 each. Dye leakage was carried out. Group A: with GP, using EndoSequence BC sealer with conventional with 4% gutta-percha (Brasseler USA, Savannah, Georgia, USA); Group B: with ceramic coated with 4% gutta-percha (Brasseler USA, Savannah, Georgia, USA); Group C: with GP, using AH Plus sealer (Dentsply, De-Trey Konstanz, Germany) with 4% gutta-percha; Group D: with GuttaFlow bioseal (Roeko-Coltène/Whaledent, Langenau, Germany) with 4% Gutta-percha; and Group E is a negative control group. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software and Student's unpaired t-test. RESULTS: The group AH Plus showed more leakage values than the GuttaFlow group and of two groups of BC sealer and negative control. Student's unpaired t-test disclosed no significant difference (P < 0.05) between the groups. CONCLUSION: None of the sealers used in the study could completely seal the apical foramen to have a fluid-tight seal. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-06 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8375899/ /pubmed/34447215 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_52_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kaul, Shalan Kumar, Ajay Badiyani, Bhumika Kamal Sukhtankar, Laxmi Madhumitha, M. Kumar, Amit Comparison of Sealing Ability of Bioceramic Sealer, AH Plus, and GuttaFlow in Conservatively Prepared Curved Root Canals Obturated with Single-Cone Technique: An In vitro Study |
title | Comparison of Sealing Ability of Bioceramic Sealer, AH Plus, and GuttaFlow in Conservatively Prepared Curved Root Canals Obturated with Single-Cone Technique: An In vitro Study |
title_full | Comparison of Sealing Ability of Bioceramic Sealer, AH Plus, and GuttaFlow in Conservatively Prepared Curved Root Canals Obturated with Single-Cone Technique: An In vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Sealing Ability of Bioceramic Sealer, AH Plus, and GuttaFlow in Conservatively Prepared Curved Root Canals Obturated with Single-Cone Technique: An In vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Sealing Ability of Bioceramic Sealer, AH Plus, and GuttaFlow in Conservatively Prepared Curved Root Canals Obturated with Single-Cone Technique: An In vitro Study |
title_short | Comparison of Sealing Ability of Bioceramic Sealer, AH Plus, and GuttaFlow in Conservatively Prepared Curved Root Canals Obturated with Single-Cone Technique: An In vitro Study |
title_sort | comparison of sealing ability of bioceramic sealer, ah plus, and guttaflow in conservatively prepared curved root canals obturated with single-cone technique: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447215 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_52_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaulshalan comparisonofsealingabilityofbioceramicsealerahplusandguttaflowinconservativelypreparedcurvedrootcanalsobturatedwithsingleconetechniqueaninvitrostudy AT kumarajay comparisonofsealingabilityofbioceramicsealerahplusandguttaflowinconservativelypreparedcurvedrootcanalsobturatedwithsingleconetechniqueaninvitrostudy AT badiyanibhumikakamal comparisonofsealingabilityofbioceramicsealerahplusandguttaflowinconservativelypreparedcurvedrootcanalsobturatedwithsingleconetechniqueaninvitrostudy AT sukhtankarlaxmi comparisonofsealingabilityofbioceramicsealerahplusandguttaflowinconservativelypreparedcurvedrootcanalsobturatedwithsingleconetechniqueaninvitrostudy AT madhumitham comparisonofsealingabilityofbioceramicsealerahplusandguttaflowinconservativelypreparedcurvedrootcanalsobturatedwithsingleconetechniqueaninvitrostudy AT kumaramit comparisonofsealingabilityofbioceramicsealerahplusandguttaflowinconservativelypreparedcurvedrootcanalsobturatedwithsingleconetechniqueaninvitrostudy |