Cargando…

A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study

BACKGROUND: Microleakage is a concern while restoring cervical lesions. Many products have attempted to minimize the interfacial gap between the tooth and restoration, the main pathway of microleakage. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To compare and evaluate the microleakage in Class V cavity restored with nanoh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Venugopal, Krishnan, Krishnaprasad, L., V. P, Prabath Singh, Ravi, Arjun B., Haridas, Kaushik, Soman, Drisya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447061
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_609_20
_version_ 1783740402247925760
author Venugopal, Krishnan
Krishnaprasad, L.
V. P, Prabath Singh
Ravi, Arjun B.
Haridas, Kaushik
Soman, Drisya
author_facet Venugopal, Krishnan
Krishnaprasad, L.
V. P, Prabath Singh
Ravi, Arjun B.
Haridas, Kaushik
Soman, Drisya
author_sort Venugopal, Krishnan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Microleakage is a concern while restoring cervical lesions. Many products have attempted to minimize the interfacial gap between the tooth and restoration, the main pathway of microleakage. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To compare and evaluate the microleakage in Class V cavity restored with nanohybrid flowable composite, Resin modified Glass Ionomer and Cention N. METHOD: Class V cavities were prepared on mandibular premolars on buccal surface with their occlusal margin placed in enamel and the gingival margin in dentin. The teeth were randomly assigned to three groups of 20 teeth each and restored with Flowable composite , Resin Modified GIC and Cention N. Samples were immersed in 0.5% Rhodamine dye, sectioned and microleakage measured using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. Statistical analysis was done using Oneway ANOVA Bonferroni's test and Kruskal Waliis test. RESULTS: The average depth of penetration of dye and scoring of depth were noted. On comparing dye penetration values between groups, RMGIC is compared with Flowable composite and Cention N, statistically significant result was obtained suggesting lesser dye penetration in RMGIC group (P < 0.001) where other comparison did not. CONCLUSION: RMGIC showed significantly less microleakage compared to the other two restorative materials used in the study and enamel margin of all restorations showed lesser microleakage than dentin margin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8375940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83759402021-08-25 A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study Venugopal, Krishnan Krishnaprasad, L. V. P, Prabath Singh Ravi, Arjun B. Haridas, Kaushik Soman, Drisya J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Microleakage is a concern while restoring cervical lesions. Many products have attempted to minimize the interfacial gap between the tooth and restoration, the main pathway of microleakage. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To compare and evaluate the microleakage in Class V cavity restored with nanohybrid flowable composite, Resin modified Glass Ionomer and Cention N. METHOD: Class V cavities were prepared on mandibular premolars on buccal surface with their occlusal margin placed in enamel and the gingival margin in dentin. The teeth were randomly assigned to three groups of 20 teeth each and restored with Flowable composite , Resin Modified GIC and Cention N. Samples were immersed in 0.5% Rhodamine dye, sectioned and microleakage measured using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. Statistical analysis was done using Oneway ANOVA Bonferroni's test and Kruskal Waliis test. RESULTS: The average depth of penetration of dye and scoring of depth were noted. On comparing dye penetration values between groups, RMGIC is compared with Flowable composite and Cention N, statistically significant result was obtained suggesting lesser dye penetration in RMGIC group (P < 0.001) where other comparison did not. CONCLUSION: RMGIC showed significantly less microleakage compared to the other two restorative materials used in the study and enamel margin of all restorations showed lesser microleakage than dentin margin. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-06 2021-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8375940/ /pubmed/34447061 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_609_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Venugopal, Krishnan
Krishnaprasad, L.
V. P, Prabath Singh
Ravi, Arjun B.
Haridas, Kaushik
Soman, Drisya
A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study
title A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study
title_full A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study
title_fullStr A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study
title_short A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of microleakage between resin-modified glass ionomer, flowable composite, and cention-n in class v restorations: a confocal laser scanning microscope study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447061
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_609_20
work_keys_str_mv AT venugopalkrishnan acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy
AT krishnaprasadl acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy
AT vpprabathsingh acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy
AT raviarjunb acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy
AT haridaskaushik acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy
AT somandrisya acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy
AT venugopalkrishnan comparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy
AT krishnaprasadl comparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy
AT vpprabathsingh comparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy
AT raviarjunb comparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy
AT haridaskaushik comparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy
AT somandrisya comparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy