Cargando…
A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study
BACKGROUND: Microleakage is a concern while restoring cervical lesions. Many products have attempted to minimize the interfacial gap between the tooth and restoration, the main pathway of microleakage. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To compare and evaluate the microleakage in Class V cavity restored with nanoh...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447061 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_609_20 |
_version_ | 1783740402247925760 |
---|---|
author | Venugopal, Krishnan Krishnaprasad, L. V. P, Prabath Singh Ravi, Arjun B. Haridas, Kaushik Soman, Drisya |
author_facet | Venugopal, Krishnan Krishnaprasad, L. V. P, Prabath Singh Ravi, Arjun B. Haridas, Kaushik Soman, Drisya |
author_sort | Venugopal, Krishnan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Microleakage is a concern while restoring cervical lesions. Many products have attempted to minimize the interfacial gap between the tooth and restoration, the main pathway of microleakage. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To compare and evaluate the microleakage in Class V cavity restored with nanohybrid flowable composite, Resin modified Glass Ionomer and Cention N. METHOD: Class V cavities were prepared on mandibular premolars on buccal surface with their occlusal margin placed in enamel and the gingival margin in dentin. The teeth were randomly assigned to three groups of 20 teeth each and restored with Flowable composite , Resin Modified GIC and Cention N. Samples were immersed in 0.5% Rhodamine dye, sectioned and microleakage measured using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. Statistical analysis was done using Oneway ANOVA Bonferroni's test and Kruskal Waliis test. RESULTS: The average depth of penetration of dye and scoring of depth were noted. On comparing dye penetration values between groups, RMGIC is compared with Flowable composite and Cention N, statistically significant result was obtained suggesting lesser dye penetration in RMGIC group (P < 0.001) where other comparison did not. CONCLUSION: RMGIC showed significantly less microleakage compared to the other two restorative materials used in the study and enamel margin of all restorations showed lesser microleakage than dentin margin. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8375940 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83759402021-08-25 A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study Venugopal, Krishnan Krishnaprasad, L. V. P, Prabath Singh Ravi, Arjun B. Haridas, Kaushik Soman, Drisya J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Microleakage is a concern while restoring cervical lesions. Many products have attempted to minimize the interfacial gap between the tooth and restoration, the main pathway of microleakage. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To compare and evaluate the microleakage in Class V cavity restored with nanohybrid flowable composite, Resin modified Glass Ionomer and Cention N. METHOD: Class V cavities were prepared on mandibular premolars on buccal surface with their occlusal margin placed in enamel and the gingival margin in dentin. The teeth were randomly assigned to three groups of 20 teeth each and restored with Flowable composite , Resin Modified GIC and Cention N. Samples were immersed in 0.5% Rhodamine dye, sectioned and microleakage measured using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. Statistical analysis was done using Oneway ANOVA Bonferroni's test and Kruskal Waliis test. RESULTS: The average depth of penetration of dye and scoring of depth were noted. On comparing dye penetration values between groups, RMGIC is compared with Flowable composite and Cention N, statistically significant result was obtained suggesting lesser dye penetration in RMGIC group (P < 0.001) where other comparison did not. CONCLUSION: RMGIC showed significantly less microleakage compared to the other two restorative materials used in the study and enamel margin of all restorations showed lesser microleakage than dentin margin. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-06 2021-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8375940/ /pubmed/34447061 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_609_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Venugopal, Krishnan Krishnaprasad, L. V. P, Prabath Singh Ravi, Arjun B. Haridas, Kaushik Soman, Drisya A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study |
title | A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study |
title_full | A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study |
title_short | A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage between Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, Flowable Composite, and Cention-N in Class V Restorations: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of microleakage between resin-modified glass ionomer, flowable composite, and cention-n in class v restorations: a confocal laser scanning microscope study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8375940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447061 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_609_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT venugopalkrishnan acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy AT krishnaprasadl acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy AT vpprabathsingh acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy AT raviarjunb acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy AT haridaskaushik acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy AT somandrisya acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy AT venugopalkrishnan comparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy AT krishnaprasadl comparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy AT vpprabathsingh comparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy AT raviarjunb comparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy AT haridaskaushik comparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy AT somandrisya comparativeevaluationofmicroleakagebetweenresinmodifiedglassionomerflowablecompositeandcentionninclassvrestorationsaconfocallaserscanningmicroscopestudy |