Cargando…
Development and Preliminary Italian Validation of the Emergency Response and Psychological Adjustment Scale
Evaluating the personal adaptation response to the emergency situations is very important for the prevention of mental distress, for the activation of network and community synergies and for the planning and implementation of appropriate psycho-social interventions. So far there are no short tools f...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8376143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34421737 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.687514 |
_version_ | 1783740445884416000 |
---|---|
author | Diotaiuti, Pierluigi Valente, Giuseppe Mancone, Stefania |
author_facet | Diotaiuti, Pierluigi Valente, Giuseppe Mancone, Stefania |
author_sort | Diotaiuti, Pierluigi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Evaluating the personal adaptation response to the emergency situations is very important for the prevention of mental distress, for the activation of network and community synergies and for the planning and implementation of appropriate psycho-social interventions. So far there are no short tools for the overall assessment of cognitive, emotional and behavioral responses of psychological adaptation to the emergency in the psychometric panorama. The Emergency Response and Psychological Adjustment Scale (ERPAS) was administered to a sample of 1,088 participants, while the concurrent validity was tested through a second administration to 600 participants along with the GSE (Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale) and the BDI-II (Beck Depression Inventory-II). Confirmatory factor analysis bore out a five-factor solution (including 18 items) with good fit indices of adaptation to data, χ(2)/df = 1.440, RMSEA = 0.028, RMSEA 90% CI = 0.018–0.038, GFI = 0.996, AGFI = 0.959, CFI = 0.982, and NFI = 0.944. Evidence of convergent validity was provided by the significant correlations with variables such as cognitive and somatic depression, and perceived general self-efficacy. The analyses also showed a strong invariance across gender. The ERPAS tool prefigures application during the assessment in multiple emergency contexts (e.g. earthquakes, floods, pandemics, terrorist attacks, war events, major accidents, major fires). This validation study of the ERPAS has shown that this version is a reliable and valid measurement for assessing people's modes of personal response (cognitive, emotional, behavioral) in emergency contexts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8376143 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83761432021-08-20 Development and Preliminary Italian Validation of the Emergency Response and Psychological Adjustment Scale Diotaiuti, Pierluigi Valente, Giuseppe Mancone, Stefania Front Psychol Psychology Evaluating the personal adaptation response to the emergency situations is very important for the prevention of mental distress, for the activation of network and community synergies and for the planning and implementation of appropriate psycho-social interventions. So far there are no short tools for the overall assessment of cognitive, emotional and behavioral responses of psychological adaptation to the emergency in the psychometric panorama. The Emergency Response and Psychological Adjustment Scale (ERPAS) was administered to a sample of 1,088 participants, while the concurrent validity was tested through a second administration to 600 participants along with the GSE (Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale) and the BDI-II (Beck Depression Inventory-II). Confirmatory factor analysis bore out a five-factor solution (including 18 items) with good fit indices of adaptation to data, χ(2)/df = 1.440, RMSEA = 0.028, RMSEA 90% CI = 0.018–0.038, GFI = 0.996, AGFI = 0.959, CFI = 0.982, and NFI = 0.944. Evidence of convergent validity was provided by the significant correlations with variables such as cognitive and somatic depression, and perceived general self-efficacy. The analyses also showed a strong invariance across gender. The ERPAS tool prefigures application during the assessment in multiple emergency contexts (e.g. earthquakes, floods, pandemics, terrorist attacks, war events, major accidents, major fires). This validation study of the ERPAS has shown that this version is a reliable and valid measurement for assessing people's modes of personal response (cognitive, emotional, behavioral) in emergency contexts. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8376143/ /pubmed/34421737 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.687514 Text en Copyright © 2021 Diotaiuti, Valente and Mancone. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Diotaiuti, Pierluigi Valente, Giuseppe Mancone, Stefania Development and Preliminary Italian Validation of the Emergency Response and Psychological Adjustment Scale |
title | Development and Preliminary Italian Validation of the Emergency Response and Psychological Adjustment Scale |
title_full | Development and Preliminary Italian Validation of the Emergency Response and Psychological Adjustment Scale |
title_fullStr | Development and Preliminary Italian Validation of the Emergency Response and Psychological Adjustment Scale |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and Preliminary Italian Validation of the Emergency Response and Psychological Adjustment Scale |
title_short | Development and Preliminary Italian Validation of the Emergency Response and Psychological Adjustment Scale |
title_sort | development and preliminary italian validation of the emergency response and psychological adjustment scale |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8376143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34421737 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.687514 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diotaiutipierluigi developmentandpreliminaryitalianvalidationoftheemergencyresponseandpsychologicaladjustmentscale AT valentegiuseppe developmentandpreliminaryitalianvalidationoftheemergencyresponseandpsychologicaladjustmentscale AT manconestefania developmentandpreliminaryitalianvalidationoftheemergencyresponseandpsychologicaladjustmentscale |