Cargando…

Suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular dislocation

The objective of this report was to introduce a new suture augmentation of coracoclavicular (CC) and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute Rockwood grade III to V acromioclavicular dislocations. From January 2015 to January 2019, 43 patients with Rockwood III to VI acute acromioclavicu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yingliang, Zhang, Xu, Yu, Yadong, Ding, Weifeng, Gao, Yong, Wang, Yanting, Yang, Rong, Dhawan, Vikas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8376387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34414992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027007
_version_ 1783740484296900608
author Liu, Yingliang
Zhang, Xu
Yu, Yadong
Ding, Weifeng
Gao, Yong
Wang, Yanting
Yang, Rong
Dhawan, Vikas
author_facet Liu, Yingliang
Zhang, Xu
Yu, Yadong
Ding, Weifeng
Gao, Yong
Wang, Yanting
Yang, Rong
Dhawan, Vikas
author_sort Liu, Yingliang
collection PubMed
description The objective of this report was to introduce a new suture augmentation of coracoclavicular (CC) and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute Rockwood grade III to V acromioclavicular dislocations. From January 2015 to January 2019, 43 patients with Rockwood III to VI acute acromioclavicular dislocations were retrospectively reviewed. For comparison, another series of 28 patients treated with double Endobutton technique from January 2011 to December 2014 were reviewed. A P < .05 was considered statistical significance. The mean follow-up period of the 2 series were 39.69 ± 7.42 months (range, 24–54 months) and 37.86 ± 8.23 months (range, 26–48 months) (P > .05), respectively. There were significant differences regarding CC space (11.62 ± 2.54 mm vs 16.78 ± 5.53 mm; P < .05), CC reduction loss (5.56 ± 4.73 mm vs 26.25 ± 4.42 mm; P < .05), and acromioclavicular space (6.89 ± 1.87 mm vs 7.95 ± 2.37 mm; P < .05). There were significant differences regarding the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (3.3 ± 2.8 vs 5.32 ± 4.37; P < .05) and University of California–Los Angeles shoulder rating scale (31.19 ± 2.48 vs 29.24 ± 2.48; P < .05). The excellent to good percentages were 100% (n = 32) and 85% (n = 23), respectively. In conclusion, the suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and CC ligament reconstruction is a reliable technique for acute acromioclavicular dislocation with minimal complications. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IIa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8376387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83763872021-08-21 Suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular dislocation Liu, Yingliang Zhang, Xu Yu, Yadong Ding, Weifeng Gao, Yong Wang, Yanting Yang, Rong Dhawan, Vikas Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 The objective of this report was to introduce a new suture augmentation of coracoclavicular (CC) and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute Rockwood grade III to V acromioclavicular dislocations. From January 2015 to January 2019, 43 patients with Rockwood III to VI acute acromioclavicular dislocations were retrospectively reviewed. For comparison, another series of 28 patients treated with double Endobutton technique from January 2011 to December 2014 were reviewed. A P < .05 was considered statistical significance. The mean follow-up period of the 2 series were 39.69 ± 7.42 months (range, 24–54 months) and 37.86 ± 8.23 months (range, 26–48 months) (P > .05), respectively. There were significant differences regarding CC space (11.62 ± 2.54 mm vs 16.78 ± 5.53 mm; P < .05), CC reduction loss (5.56 ± 4.73 mm vs 26.25 ± 4.42 mm; P < .05), and acromioclavicular space (6.89 ± 1.87 mm vs 7.95 ± 2.37 mm; P < .05). There were significant differences regarding the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (3.3 ± 2.8 vs 5.32 ± 4.37; P < .05) and University of California–Los Angeles shoulder rating scale (31.19 ± 2.48 vs 29.24 ± 2.48; P < .05). The excellent to good percentages were 100% (n = 32) and 85% (n = 23), respectively. In conclusion, the suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and CC ligament reconstruction is a reliable technique for acute acromioclavicular dislocation with minimal complications. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IIa. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8376387/ /pubmed/34414992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027007 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 7100
Liu, Yingliang
Zhang, Xu
Yu, Yadong
Ding, Weifeng
Gao, Yong
Wang, Yanting
Yang, Rong
Dhawan, Vikas
Suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular dislocation
title Suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular dislocation
title_full Suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular dislocation
title_fullStr Suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular dislocation
title_full_unstemmed Suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular dislocation
title_short Suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular dislocation
title_sort suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular dislocation
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8376387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34414992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027007
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyingliang sutureaugmentationofacromioclavicularandcoracoclavicularligamentreconstructionforacuteacromioclaviculardislocation
AT zhangxu sutureaugmentationofacromioclavicularandcoracoclavicularligamentreconstructionforacuteacromioclaviculardislocation
AT yuyadong sutureaugmentationofacromioclavicularandcoracoclavicularligamentreconstructionforacuteacromioclaviculardislocation
AT dingweifeng sutureaugmentationofacromioclavicularandcoracoclavicularligamentreconstructionforacuteacromioclaviculardislocation
AT gaoyong sutureaugmentationofacromioclavicularandcoracoclavicularligamentreconstructionforacuteacromioclaviculardislocation
AT wangyanting sutureaugmentationofacromioclavicularandcoracoclavicularligamentreconstructionforacuteacromioclaviculardislocation
AT yangrong sutureaugmentationofacromioclavicularandcoracoclavicularligamentreconstructionforacuteacromioclaviculardislocation
AT dhawanvikas sutureaugmentationofacromioclavicularandcoracoclavicularligamentreconstructionforacuteacromioclaviculardislocation