Cargando…

The efficacy of catheter ablation versus ICD for prevention of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Although implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) could prevent the sudden death of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with ischemic heart disease, it could not effectively prevent the recurrence of ventricular tachycardia. Several studies have suggested that catheter ablation may...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Guolin, Xu, Xin, Yi, Qijian, Lv, Tiewei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8376706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33723693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00848-1
_version_ 1783740521370353664
author Liu, Guolin
Xu, Xin
Yi, Qijian
Lv, Tiewei
author_facet Liu, Guolin
Xu, Xin
Yi, Qijian
Lv, Tiewei
author_sort Liu, Guolin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Although implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) could prevent the sudden death of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with ischemic heart disease, it could not effectively prevent the recurrence of ventricular tachycardia. Several studies have suggested that catheter ablation may effectively decrease the incidence of ICD events, but relevant dates from randomized controlled trials were limited. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials were performed to evaluate the effect of catheter ablation for the prevention of VT in patients with ischemic heart disease. Random-effects model with inverse-variance weighting method was used to pool odds ratios. Egger method was performed to evaluate whether there was public bias in each outcome. RESULTS: Four studies enrolling a total of 605 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. Compared with the control group (ICD ± AAD), catheter ablation could significantly reduce the incidence of ICD therapy (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28 ~ 0.87), ICD shock (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28 ~ 0.87), VT storm (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40 ~ 0.90), and cardiovascular-related hospitalization (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45 ~ 0.9). But there was no significant difference among the risk of all-cause mortality (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.59 ~ 1.34), cardiovascular mortality (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.44 ~ 1.30), and complication (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.30 ~ 2.67). CONCLUSION: These results showed that catheter ablation combined with ICD could reduce ICD therapy, ICD shock, and VT storm in patients with ischemic heart disease, but there was no improvement in all-cause mortality. Meanwhile, it also provided a basic guidance for the design of larger clinical randomized trials with longer follow-up in the future. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10840-020-00848-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8376706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83767062021-09-02 The efficacy of catheter ablation versus ICD for prevention of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Liu, Guolin Xu, Xin Yi, Qijian Lv, Tiewei J Interv Card Electrophysiol Reviews PURPOSE: Although implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) could prevent the sudden death of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with ischemic heart disease, it could not effectively prevent the recurrence of ventricular tachycardia. Several studies have suggested that catheter ablation may effectively decrease the incidence of ICD events, but relevant dates from randomized controlled trials were limited. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials were performed to evaluate the effect of catheter ablation for the prevention of VT in patients with ischemic heart disease. Random-effects model with inverse-variance weighting method was used to pool odds ratios. Egger method was performed to evaluate whether there was public bias in each outcome. RESULTS: Four studies enrolling a total of 605 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. Compared with the control group (ICD ± AAD), catheter ablation could significantly reduce the incidence of ICD therapy (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28 ~ 0.87), ICD shock (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28 ~ 0.87), VT storm (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40 ~ 0.90), and cardiovascular-related hospitalization (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45 ~ 0.9). But there was no significant difference among the risk of all-cause mortality (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.59 ~ 1.34), cardiovascular mortality (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.44 ~ 1.30), and complication (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.30 ~ 2.67). CONCLUSION: These results showed that catheter ablation combined with ICD could reduce ICD therapy, ICD shock, and VT storm in patients with ischemic heart disease, but there was no improvement in all-cause mortality. Meanwhile, it also provided a basic guidance for the design of larger clinical randomized trials with longer follow-up in the future. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10840-020-00848-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2021-03-15 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8376706/ /pubmed/33723693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00848-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Reviews
Liu, Guolin
Xu, Xin
Yi, Qijian
Lv, Tiewei
The efficacy of catheter ablation versus ICD for prevention of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The efficacy of catheter ablation versus ICD for prevention of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The efficacy of catheter ablation versus ICD for prevention of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The efficacy of catheter ablation versus ICD for prevention of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of catheter ablation versus ICD for prevention of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The efficacy of catheter ablation versus ICD for prevention of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of catheter ablation versus icd for prevention of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8376706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33723693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00848-1
work_keys_str_mv AT liuguolin theefficacyofcatheterablationversusicdforpreventionofventriculartachycardiainpatientswithischemicheartdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuxin theefficacyofcatheterablationversusicdforpreventionofventriculartachycardiainpatientswithischemicheartdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yiqijian theefficacyofcatheterablationversusicdforpreventionofventriculartachycardiainpatientswithischemicheartdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lvtiewei theefficacyofcatheterablationversusicdforpreventionofventriculartachycardiainpatientswithischemicheartdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuguolin efficacyofcatheterablationversusicdforpreventionofventriculartachycardiainpatientswithischemicheartdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuxin efficacyofcatheterablationversusicdforpreventionofventriculartachycardiainpatientswithischemicheartdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yiqijian efficacyofcatheterablationversusicdforpreventionofventriculartachycardiainpatientswithischemicheartdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lvtiewei efficacyofcatheterablationversusicdforpreventionofventriculartachycardiainpatientswithischemicheartdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis