Cargando…
The efficacy of catheter ablation versus ICD for prevention of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
PURPOSE: Although implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) could prevent the sudden death of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with ischemic heart disease, it could not effectively prevent the recurrence of ventricular tachycardia. Several studies have suggested that catheter ablation may...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8376706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33723693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00848-1 |
_version_ | 1783740521370353664 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Guolin Xu, Xin Yi, Qijian Lv, Tiewei |
author_facet | Liu, Guolin Xu, Xin Yi, Qijian Lv, Tiewei |
author_sort | Liu, Guolin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Although implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) could prevent the sudden death of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with ischemic heart disease, it could not effectively prevent the recurrence of ventricular tachycardia. Several studies have suggested that catheter ablation may effectively decrease the incidence of ICD events, but relevant dates from randomized controlled trials were limited. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials were performed to evaluate the effect of catheter ablation for the prevention of VT in patients with ischemic heart disease. Random-effects model with inverse-variance weighting method was used to pool odds ratios. Egger method was performed to evaluate whether there was public bias in each outcome. RESULTS: Four studies enrolling a total of 605 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. Compared with the control group (ICD ± AAD), catheter ablation could significantly reduce the incidence of ICD therapy (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28 ~ 0.87), ICD shock (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28 ~ 0.87), VT storm (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40 ~ 0.90), and cardiovascular-related hospitalization (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45 ~ 0.9). But there was no significant difference among the risk of all-cause mortality (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.59 ~ 1.34), cardiovascular mortality (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.44 ~ 1.30), and complication (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.30 ~ 2.67). CONCLUSION: These results showed that catheter ablation combined with ICD could reduce ICD therapy, ICD shock, and VT storm in patients with ischemic heart disease, but there was no improvement in all-cause mortality. Meanwhile, it also provided a basic guidance for the design of larger clinical randomized trials with longer follow-up in the future. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10840-020-00848-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8376706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83767062021-09-02 The efficacy of catheter ablation versus ICD for prevention of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Liu, Guolin Xu, Xin Yi, Qijian Lv, Tiewei J Interv Card Electrophysiol Reviews PURPOSE: Although implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) could prevent the sudden death of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with ischemic heart disease, it could not effectively prevent the recurrence of ventricular tachycardia. Several studies have suggested that catheter ablation may effectively decrease the incidence of ICD events, but relevant dates from randomized controlled trials were limited. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials were performed to evaluate the effect of catheter ablation for the prevention of VT in patients with ischemic heart disease. Random-effects model with inverse-variance weighting method was used to pool odds ratios. Egger method was performed to evaluate whether there was public bias in each outcome. RESULTS: Four studies enrolling a total of 605 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. Compared with the control group (ICD ± AAD), catheter ablation could significantly reduce the incidence of ICD therapy (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28 ~ 0.87), ICD shock (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28 ~ 0.87), VT storm (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40 ~ 0.90), and cardiovascular-related hospitalization (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45 ~ 0.9). But there was no significant difference among the risk of all-cause mortality (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.59 ~ 1.34), cardiovascular mortality (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.44 ~ 1.30), and complication (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.30 ~ 2.67). CONCLUSION: These results showed that catheter ablation combined with ICD could reduce ICD therapy, ICD shock, and VT storm in patients with ischemic heart disease, but there was no improvement in all-cause mortality. Meanwhile, it also provided a basic guidance for the design of larger clinical randomized trials with longer follow-up in the future. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10840-020-00848-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2021-03-15 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8376706/ /pubmed/33723693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00848-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Reviews Liu, Guolin Xu, Xin Yi, Qijian Lv, Tiewei The efficacy of catheter ablation versus ICD for prevention of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The efficacy of catheter ablation versus ICD for prevention of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The efficacy of catheter ablation versus ICD for prevention of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The efficacy of catheter ablation versus ICD for prevention of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy of catheter ablation versus ICD for prevention of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The efficacy of catheter ablation versus ICD for prevention of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy of catheter ablation versus icd for prevention of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8376706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33723693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00848-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuguolin theefficacyofcatheterablationversusicdforpreventionofventriculartachycardiainpatientswithischemicheartdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xuxin theefficacyofcatheterablationversusicdforpreventionofventriculartachycardiainpatientswithischemicheartdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yiqijian theefficacyofcatheterablationversusicdforpreventionofventriculartachycardiainpatientswithischemicheartdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lvtiewei theefficacyofcatheterablationversusicdforpreventionofventriculartachycardiainpatientswithischemicheartdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuguolin efficacyofcatheterablationversusicdforpreventionofventriculartachycardiainpatientswithischemicheartdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xuxin efficacyofcatheterablationversusicdforpreventionofventriculartachycardiainpatientswithischemicheartdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yiqijian efficacyofcatheterablationversusicdforpreventionofventriculartachycardiainpatientswithischemicheartdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lvtiewei efficacyofcatheterablationversusicdforpreventionofventriculartachycardiainpatientswithischemicheartdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |