Cargando…

Prediction of obstructive sleep apnea: comparative performance of three screening instruments on the apnea-hypopnea index and the oxygen desaturation index

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of the NoSAS (neck, obesity, snoring, age, sex) score, the STOP-Bang (snoring, tiredness, observed apneas, blood pressure, body mass index, age, neck circumference, gender) questionnaire, and the Epworth sleepiness score (ESS) as a screening tool for obstructive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veugen, Christianne C. A. F. M., Teunissen, Emma M., den Otter, Leontine A. S., Kos, Martijn P., Stokroos, Robert J., Copper, Marcel P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8376723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33098537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-020-02219-6
_version_ 1783740524466798592
author Veugen, Christianne C. A. F. M.
Teunissen, Emma M.
den Otter, Leontine A. S.
Kos, Martijn P.
Stokroos, Robert J.
Copper, Marcel P.
author_facet Veugen, Christianne C. A. F. M.
Teunissen, Emma M.
den Otter, Leontine A. S.
Kos, Martijn P.
Stokroos, Robert J.
Copper, Marcel P.
author_sort Veugen, Christianne C. A. F. M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of the NoSAS (neck, obesity, snoring, age, sex) score, the STOP-Bang (snoring, tiredness, observed apneas, blood pressure, body mass index, age, neck circumference, gender) questionnaire, and the Epworth sleepiness score (ESS) as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity based on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and the oxygen desaturation index (ODI). METHODS: Data from 235 patients who were monitored by ambulant polysomnography (PSG) were retrospectively analyzed. OSA severity was classified based on the AHI; similar classification categories were made based on the ODI. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC), while predictive parameters were calculated by four-grid contingency tables. RESULTS: The NoSAS score and the STOP-Bang questionnaire were both equally adequate screening tools for the AHI and the ODI with AUC ranging from 0.695 to 0.767 and 0.684 to 0.767, respectively. Both questionnaires perform better when used as a continuous variable. The ESS did not show adequate discrimination for screening for OSA (AUC ranging from 0.450 to 0.525). Male gender, age, and BMI proved to be the strongest individual predictors in this cohort. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the predictive performance of three different screening instruments with respect to both the AHI and the ODI. This is important, due to increasing evidence that the ODI may have a higher reproducibility in the clinical setting. The NoSAS score and the STOP-Bang questionnaire proved to be equally adequate to predict OSA severity based on both the AHI and the ODI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11325-020-02219-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8376723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83767232021-09-02 Prediction of obstructive sleep apnea: comparative performance of three screening instruments on the apnea-hypopnea index and the oxygen desaturation index Veugen, Christianne C. A. F. M. Teunissen, Emma M. den Otter, Leontine A. S. Kos, Martijn P. Stokroos, Robert J. Copper, Marcel P. Sleep Breath Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of the NoSAS (neck, obesity, snoring, age, sex) score, the STOP-Bang (snoring, tiredness, observed apneas, blood pressure, body mass index, age, neck circumference, gender) questionnaire, and the Epworth sleepiness score (ESS) as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity based on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and the oxygen desaturation index (ODI). METHODS: Data from 235 patients who were monitored by ambulant polysomnography (PSG) were retrospectively analyzed. OSA severity was classified based on the AHI; similar classification categories were made based on the ODI. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC), while predictive parameters were calculated by four-grid contingency tables. RESULTS: The NoSAS score and the STOP-Bang questionnaire were both equally adequate screening tools for the AHI and the ODI with AUC ranging from 0.695 to 0.767 and 0.684 to 0.767, respectively. Both questionnaires perform better when used as a continuous variable. The ESS did not show adequate discrimination for screening for OSA (AUC ranging from 0.450 to 0.525). Male gender, age, and BMI proved to be the strongest individual predictors in this cohort. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the predictive performance of three different screening instruments with respect to both the AHI and the ODI. This is important, due to increasing evidence that the ODI may have a higher reproducibility in the clinical setting. The NoSAS score and the STOP-Bang questionnaire proved to be equally adequate to predict OSA severity based on both the AHI and the ODI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11325-020-02219-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-10-24 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8376723/ /pubmed/33098537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-020-02219-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article
Veugen, Christianne C. A. F. M.
Teunissen, Emma M.
den Otter, Leontine A. S.
Kos, Martijn P.
Stokroos, Robert J.
Copper, Marcel P.
Prediction of obstructive sleep apnea: comparative performance of three screening instruments on the apnea-hypopnea index and the oxygen desaturation index
title Prediction of obstructive sleep apnea: comparative performance of three screening instruments on the apnea-hypopnea index and the oxygen desaturation index
title_full Prediction of obstructive sleep apnea: comparative performance of three screening instruments on the apnea-hypopnea index and the oxygen desaturation index
title_fullStr Prediction of obstructive sleep apnea: comparative performance of three screening instruments on the apnea-hypopnea index and the oxygen desaturation index
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of obstructive sleep apnea: comparative performance of three screening instruments on the apnea-hypopnea index and the oxygen desaturation index
title_short Prediction of obstructive sleep apnea: comparative performance of three screening instruments on the apnea-hypopnea index and the oxygen desaturation index
title_sort prediction of obstructive sleep apnea: comparative performance of three screening instruments on the apnea-hypopnea index and the oxygen desaturation index
topic Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8376723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33098537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-020-02219-6
work_keys_str_mv AT veugenchristiannecafm predictionofobstructivesleepapneacomparativeperformanceofthreescreeninginstrumentsontheapneahypopneaindexandtheoxygendesaturationindex
AT teunissenemmam predictionofobstructivesleepapneacomparativeperformanceofthreescreeninginstrumentsontheapneahypopneaindexandtheoxygendesaturationindex
AT denotterleontineas predictionofobstructivesleepapneacomparativeperformanceofthreescreeninginstrumentsontheapneahypopneaindexandtheoxygendesaturationindex
AT kosmartijnp predictionofobstructivesleepapneacomparativeperformanceofthreescreeninginstrumentsontheapneahypopneaindexandtheoxygendesaturationindex
AT stokroosrobertj predictionofobstructivesleepapneacomparativeperformanceofthreescreeninginstrumentsontheapneahypopneaindexandtheoxygendesaturationindex
AT coppermarcelp predictionofobstructivesleepapneacomparativeperformanceofthreescreeninginstrumentsontheapneahypopneaindexandtheoxygendesaturationindex