Cargando…
Application of the improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation suitable for primary hospitals
The purpose of the research was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the X-ray-free improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation as well as the practicability of the method in primary hospitals. Patients [including those suffering from sick sinus syndrome and...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34413394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96338-z |
_version_ | 1783740574000480256 |
---|---|
author | Zhong, Changqing Mao, Shanjun Guang, Jieli Zhang, Yi |
author_facet | Zhong, Changqing Mao, Shanjun Guang, Jieli Zhang, Yi |
author_sort | Zhong, Changqing |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of the research was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the X-ray-free improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation as well as the practicability of the method in primary hospitals. Patients [including those suffering from sick sinus syndrome and third-degree and advanced atrioventricular blockage (AVB)] who needed emergency temporary pacemaker implantation from July 2017 to August 2020 in Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital were selected. They were stochastically divided into a research group (95 cases) treated with the improved simple bedside method and a control group (95 cases) with X-ray guidance. The ordinary bipolar electrodes were used in both groups. On this condition, the operation duration, the first-attempt success rate of electrodes, pacing threshold, success rate of the operation, the rate of electrode displacement, and complications in the two groups were separately calculated. The comparison results of the research group with the control group are shown as follows: operation time [(18 ± 5.91) min vs. (43 ± 2.99) min, P < 0.05], the first-attempt success rate of the electrode (97% vs. 98%, P > 0.05), pacing threshold [(0.97 ± 0.35) vs. (0.97 ± 0.32) V, P > 0.05], success rate of the operation (98.9% vs. 100%, P > 0.05), the rate of electrode displacement (8.4% vs. 7.3%, P > 0.05) and complications (3.2% vs. 2.1%, P > 0.05). The emergency temporary pacemaker implantation based on the improved simple bedside method is as safe and effective as the surgical method under X-ray guidance, and the operation is simpler and easier to learn and requires a shorter operating time, therefore, it is more suitable for use in emergency and primary hospitals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8377026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83770262021-08-27 Application of the improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation suitable for primary hospitals Zhong, Changqing Mao, Shanjun Guang, Jieli Zhang, Yi Sci Rep Article The purpose of the research was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the X-ray-free improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation as well as the practicability of the method in primary hospitals. Patients [including those suffering from sick sinus syndrome and third-degree and advanced atrioventricular blockage (AVB)] who needed emergency temporary pacemaker implantation from July 2017 to August 2020 in Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital were selected. They were stochastically divided into a research group (95 cases) treated with the improved simple bedside method and a control group (95 cases) with X-ray guidance. The ordinary bipolar electrodes were used in both groups. On this condition, the operation duration, the first-attempt success rate of electrodes, pacing threshold, success rate of the operation, the rate of electrode displacement, and complications in the two groups were separately calculated. The comparison results of the research group with the control group are shown as follows: operation time [(18 ± 5.91) min vs. (43 ± 2.99) min, P < 0.05], the first-attempt success rate of the electrode (97% vs. 98%, P > 0.05), pacing threshold [(0.97 ± 0.35) vs. (0.97 ± 0.32) V, P > 0.05], success rate of the operation (98.9% vs. 100%, P > 0.05), the rate of electrode displacement (8.4% vs. 7.3%, P > 0.05) and complications (3.2% vs. 2.1%, P > 0.05). The emergency temporary pacemaker implantation based on the improved simple bedside method is as safe and effective as the surgical method under X-ray guidance, and the operation is simpler and easier to learn and requires a shorter operating time, therefore, it is more suitable for use in emergency and primary hospitals. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8377026/ /pubmed/34413394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96338-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Zhong, Changqing Mao, Shanjun Guang, Jieli Zhang, Yi Application of the improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation suitable for primary hospitals |
title | Application of the improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation suitable for primary hospitals |
title_full | Application of the improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation suitable for primary hospitals |
title_fullStr | Application of the improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation suitable for primary hospitals |
title_full_unstemmed | Application of the improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation suitable for primary hospitals |
title_short | Application of the improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation suitable for primary hospitals |
title_sort | application of the improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation suitable for primary hospitals |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34413394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96338-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhongchangqing applicationoftheimprovedsimplebedsidemethodforemergencytemporarypacemakerimplantationsuitableforprimaryhospitals AT maoshanjun applicationoftheimprovedsimplebedsidemethodforemergencytemporarypacemakerimplantationsuitableforprimaryhospitals AT guangjieli applicationoftheimprovedsimplebedsidemethodforemergencytemporarypacemakerimplantationsuitableforprimaryhospitals AT zhangyi applicationoftheimprovedsimplebedsidemethodforemergencytemporarypacemakerimplantationsuitableforprimaryhospitals |