Cargando…

Application of the improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation suitable for primary hospitals

The purpose of the research was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the X-ray-free improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation as well as the practicability of the method in primary hospitals. Patients [including those suffering from sick sinus syndrome and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhong, Changqing, Mao, Shanjun, Guang, Jieli, Zhang, Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34413394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96338-z
_version_ 1783740574000480256
author Zhong, Changqing
Mao, Shanjun
Guang, Jieli
Zhang, Yi
author_facet Zhong, Changqing
Mao, Shanjun
Guang, Jieli
Zhang, Yi
author_sort Zhong, Changqing
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the research was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the X-ray-free improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation as well as the practicability of the method in primary hospitals. Patients [including those suffering from sick sinus syndrome and third-degree and advanced atrioventricular blockage (AVB)] who needed emergency temporary pacemaker implantation from July 2017 to August 2020 in Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital were selected. They were stochastically divided into a research group (95 cases) treated with the improved simple bedside method and a control group (95 cases) with X-ray guidance. The ordinary bipolar electrodes were used in both groups. On this condition, the operation duration, the first-attempt success rate of electrodes, pacing threshold, success rate of the operation, the rate of electrode displacement, and complications in the two groups were separately calculated. The comparison results of the research group with the control group are shown as follows: operation time [(18 ± 5.91) min vs. (43 ± 2.99) min, P < 0.05], the first-attempt success rate of the electrode (97% vs. 98%, P > 0.05), pacing threshold [(0.97 ± 0.35) vs. (0.97 ± 0.32) V, P > 0.05], success rate of the operation (98.9% vs. 100%, P > 0.05), the rate of electrode displacement (8.4% vs. 7.3%, P > 0.05) and complications (3.2% vs. 2.1%, P > 0.05). The emergency temporary pacemaker implantation based on the improved simple bedside method is as safe and effective as the surgical method under X-ray guidance, and the operation is simpler and easier to learn and requires a shorter operating time, therefore, it is more suitable for use in emergency and primary hospitals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8377026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83770262021-08-27 Application of the improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation suitable for primary hospitals Zhong, Changqing Mao, Shanjun Guang, Jieli Zhang, Yi Sci Rep Article The purpose of the research was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the X-ray-free improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation as well as the practicability of the method in primary hospitals. Patients [including those suffering from sick sinus syndrome and third-degree and advanced atrioventricular blockage (AVB)] who needed emergency temporary pacemaker implantation from July 2017 to August 2020 in Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital were selected. They were stochastically divided into a research group (95 cases) treated with the improved simple bedside method and a control group (95 cases) with X-ray guidance. The ordinary bipolar electrodes were used in both groups. On this condition, the operation duration, the first-attempt success rate of electrodes, pacing threshold, success rate of the operation, the rate of electrode displacement, and complications in the two groups were separately calculated. The comparison results of the research group with the control group are shown as follows: operation time [(18 ± 5.91) min vs. (43 ± 2.99) min, P < 0.05], the first-attempt success rate of the electrode (97% vs. 98%, P > 0.05), pacing threshold [(0.97 ± 0.35) vs. (0.97 ± 0.32) V, P > 0.05], success rate of the operation (98.9% vs. 100%, P > 0.05), the rate of electrode displacement (8.4% vs. 7.3%, P > 0.05) and complications (3.2% vs. 2.1%, P > 0.05). The emergency temporary pacemaker implantation based on the improved simple bedside method is as safe and effective as the surgical method under X-ray guidance, and the operation is simpler and easier to learn and requires a shorter operating time, therefore, it is more suitable for use in emergency and primary hospitals. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8377026/ /pubmed/34413394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96338-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Zhong, Changqing
Mao, Shanjun
Guang, Jieli
Zhang, Yi
Application of the improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation suitable for primary hospitals
title Application of the improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation suitable for primary hospitals
title_full Application of the improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation suitable for primary hospitals
title_fullStr Application of the improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation suitable for primary hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Application of the improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation suitable for primary hospitals
title_short Application of the improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation suitable for primary hospitals
title_sort application of the improved simple bedside method for emergency temporary pacemaker implantation suitable for primary hospitals
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34413394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96338-z
work_keys_str_mv AT zhongchangqing applicationoftheimprovedsimplebedsidemethodforemergencytemporarypacemakerimplantationsuitableforprimaryhospitals
AT maoshanjun applicationoftheimprovedsimplebedsidemethodforemergencytemporarypacemakerimplantationsuitableforprimaryhospitals
AT guangjieli applicationoftheimprovedsimplebedsidemethodforemergencytemporarypacemakerimplantationsuitableforprimaryhospitals
AT zhangyi applicationoftheimprovedsimplebedsidemethodforemergencytemporarypacemakerimplantationsuitableforprimaryhospitals