Cargando…

Impact of Spinal Correction Surgeries with Osteotomy and Pelvic Fixation in Patients with Kyphosis Due to Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures

STUDY DESIGN: Combination of retrospective and prospective study. PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between local fixation surgery and spinopelvic fixation surgery for the treatment of kyphosis secondary to osteoporotic vertebral fractures with spinopelvic malalignment. OVERVIEW OF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasegawa, Tomohiko, Ushirozako, Hiroki, Yamato, Yu, Yoshida, Go, Yasuda, Tatsuya, Banno, Tomohiro, Arima, Hideyuki, Oe, Shin, Yamada, Tomohiro, Ide, Koichiro, Watanabe, Yuh, Matsuyama, Yukihiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32872756
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0016
_version_ 1783740610076737536
author Hasegawa, Tomohiko
Ushirozako, Hiroki
Yamato, Yu
Yoshida, Go
Yasuda, Tatsuya
Banno, Tomohiro
Arima, Hideyuki
Oe, Shin
Yamada, Tomohiro
Ide, Koichiro
Watanabe, Yuh
Matsuyama, Yukihiro
author_facet Hasegawa, Tomohiko
Ushirozako, Hiroki
Yamato, Yu
Yoshida, Go
Yasuda, Tatsuya
Banno, Tomohiro
Arima, Hideyuki
Oe, Shin
Yamada, Tomohiro
Ide, Koichiro
Watanabe, Yuh
Matsuyama, Yukihiro
author_sort Hasegawa, Tomohiko
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Combination of retrospective and prospective study. PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between local fixation surgery and spinopelvic fixation surgery for the treatment of kyphosis secondary to osteoporotic vertebral fractures with spinopelvic malalignment. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The clinical characteristics of patients with rigid kyphosis due to osteoporotic vertebral fracture differ from that of middle-aged patients with vertebral fractures in terms of bone fragility and presence of spinopelvic malalignment. Little is known about the surgical strategies for these deformities, most especially the extent of fusion of vertebra involved. METHODS: We analyzed 24 patients with vertebral osteotomy at the level of the fracture and spinal fixation without pelvic fixation (local group), and 22 patients with vertebral osteotomy and pelvic fixation (pelvic group). Radiographic parameters, the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), distal junctional kyphosis (DJK), rod fractures, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were compared between the two groups over a 2-year follow-up period. RESULTS: In the pelvic group, postoperative spinopelvic parameters significantly improved, with the improvements maintained. No remarkable changes in spinopelvic parameters were seen in the local group. The mean ODI scores 2 years after surgery were 45.3 and 33.0 in the local and pelvic group, respectively (p-value <0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of PJK in the local and pelvic groups, but there was a higher rate of DJK (41.7%) in the local group. In contrast, rod fractures were more common in the pelvic group (45.5%). Patients with DJK had higher ODI scores 2 years after surgery (52.0 in DJK patients vs. 34.8 in non-DJK patients; p-value <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with rigid kyphosis due to osteoporotic vertebral fractures, better spinopelvic alignment and health-related quality of life can be achieved through extensive corrective surgery with pelvic fixation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8377210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83772102021-08-25 Impact of Spinal Correction Surgeries with Osteotomy and Pelvic Fixation in Patients with Kyphosis Due to Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures Hasegawa, Tomohiko Ushirozako, Hiroki Yamato, Yu Yoshida, Go Yasuda, Tatsuya Banno, Tomohiro Arima, Hideyuki Oe, Shin Yamada, Tomohiro Ide, Koichiro Watanabe, Yuh Matsuyama, Yukihiro Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Combination of retrospective and prospective study. PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between local fixation surgery and spinopelvic fixation surgery for the treatment of kyphosis secondary to osteoporotic vertebral fractures with spinopelvic malalignment. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The clinical characteristics of patients with rigid kyphosis due to osteoporotic vertebral fracture differ from that of middle-aged patients with vertebral fractures in terms of bone fragility and presence of spinopelvic malalignment. Little is known about the surgical strategies for these deformities, most especially the extent of fusion of vertebra involved. METHODS: We analyzed 24 patients with vertebral osteotomy at the level of the fracture and spinal fixation without pelvic fixation (local group), and 22 patients with vertebral osteotomy and pelvic fixation (pelvic group). Radiographic parameters, the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), distal junctional kyphosis (DJK), rod fractures, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were compared between the two groups over a 2-year follow-up period. RESULTS: In the pelvic group, postoperative spinopelvic parameters significantly improved, with the improvements maintained. No remarkable changes in spinopelvic parameters were seen in the local group. The mean ODI scores 2 years after surgery were 45.3 and 33.0 in the local and pelvic group, respectively (p-value <0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of PJK in the local and pelvic groups, but there was a higher rate of DJK (41.7%) in the local group. In contrast, rod fractures were more common in the pelvic group (45.5%). Patients with DJK had higher ODI scores 2 years after surgery (52.0 in DJK patients vs. 34.8 in non-DJK patients; p-value <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with rigid kyphosis due to osteoporotic vertebral fractures, better spinopelvic alignment and health-related quality of life can be achieved through extensive corrective surgery with pelvic fixation. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2021-08 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8377210/ /pubmed/32872756 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0016 Text en Copyright © 2021 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Hasegawa, Tomohiko
Ushirozako, Hiroki
Yamato, Yu
Yoshida, Go
Yasuda, Tatsuya
Banno, Tomohiro
Arima, Hideyuki
Oe, Shin
Yamada, Tomohiro
Ide, Koichiro
Watanabe, Yuh
Matsuyama, Yukihiro
Impact of Spinal Correction Surgeries with Osteotomy and Pelvic Fixation in Patients with Kyphosis Due to Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
title Impact of Spinal Correction Surgeries with Osteotomy and Pelvic Fixation in Patients with Kyphosis Due to Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
title_full Impact of Spinal Correction Surgeries with Osteotomy and Pelvic Fixation in Patients with Kyphosis Due to Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
title_fullStr Impact of Spinal Correction Surgeries with Osteotomy and Pelvic Fixation in Patients with Kyphosis Due to Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Spinal Correction Surgeries with Osteotomy and Pelvic Fixation in Patients with Kyphosis Due to Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
title_short Impact of Spinal Correction Surgeries with Osteotomy and Pelvic Fixation in Patients with Kyphosis Due to Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
title_sort impact of spinal correction surgeries with osteotomy and pelvic fixation in patients with kyphosis due to osteoporotic vertebral fractures
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32872756
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0016
work_keys_str_mv AT hasegawatomohiko impactofspinalcorrectionsurgerieswithosteotomyandpelvicfixationinpatientswithkyphosisduetoosteoporoticvertebralfractures
AT ushirozakohiroki impactofspinalcorrectionsurgerieswithosteotomyandpelvicfixationinpatientswithkyphosisduetoosteoporoticvertebralfractures
AT yamatoyu impactofspinalcorrectionsurgerieswithosteotomyandpelvicfixationinpatientswithkyphosisduetoosteoporoticvertebralfractures
AT yoshidago impactofspinalcorrectionsurgerieswithosteotomyandpelvicfixationinpatientswithkyphosisduetoosteoporoticvertebralfractures
AT yasudatatsuya impactofspinalcorrectionsurgerieswithosteotomyandpelvicfixationinpatientswithkyphosisduetoosteoporoticvertebralfractures
AT bannotomohiro impactofspinalcorrectionsurgerieswithosteotomyandpelvicfixationinpatientswithkyphosisduetoosteoporoticvertebralfractures
AT arimahideyuki impactofspinalcorrectionsurgerieswithosteotomyandpelvicfixationinpatientswithkyphosisduetoosteoporoticvertebralfractures
AT oeshin impactofspinalcorrectionsurgerieswithosteotomyandpelvicfixationinpatientswithkyphosisduetoosteoporoticvertebralfractures
AT yamadatomohiro impactofspinalcorrectionsurgerieswithosteotomyandpelvicfixationinpatientswithkyphosisduetoosteoporoticvertebralfractures
AT idekoichiro impactofspinalcorrectionsurgerieswithosteotomyandpelvicfixationinpatientswithkyphosisduetoosteoporoticvertebralfractures
AT watanabeyuh impactofspinalcorrectionsurgerieswithosteotomyandpelvicfixationinpatientswithkyphosisduetoosteoporoticvertebralfractures
AT matsuyamayukihiro impactofspinalcorrectionsurgerieswithosteotomyandpelvicfixationinpatientswithkyphosisduetoosteoporoticvertebralfractures