Cargando…
Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Mobilization versus Conventional Therapy on Spasticity Reduction and Upper Limb Function in Tetraplegic Patients
STUDY DESIGN: The study employed a pre- and post-test experimental design. PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the effect of neurodynamic mobilization of the median nerve on upper limb spasticity in tetraplegic patients. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Spasticity is a common and potentially disabling...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33059433 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0146 |
_version_ | 1783740612873289728 |
---|---|
author | Saxena, Akanksha Sehgal, Stuti Jangra, Mandeep Kumar |
author_facet | Saxena, Akanksha Sehgal, Stuti Jangra, Mandeep Kumar |
author_sort | Saxena, Akanksha |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: The study employed a pre- and post-test experimental design. PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the effect of neurodynamic mobilization of the median nerve on upper limb spasticity in tetraplegic patients. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Spasticity is a common and potentially disabling and bothersome complication in patients with spinal cord lesion; this disorder can negatively influence the quality of life by restricting the patient’s ability to perform activities of daily living. Neural mobilization is currently used for reducing the spasticity in individuals with neurological disorders. METHODS: Twenty subjects with traumatic spinal cord injury (level C5–C8) and upper limb spasticity in the finger and wrist flexors were enrolled. They were randomly allocated to two different groups using a computer-generated randomization schedule: group I comprised the neurodynamic mobilization group (n=11) and group II was the conventional therapy group (n=9); the subjects were administered therapy for 5 days every week for a period of 4 weeks. Upper limb spasticity was assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale for wrist and finger flexors; F-wave amplitude, latency, and F-wave/M-wave amplitude ratio (F/M ratio) were examined using the F-wave scores of the median nerve; and upper limb function was determined using the Capabilities of Upper Extremity (CUE) Questionnaire. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of intervention, between-group comparisons showed a significant difference in the pre-intervention and postintervention scores on the Modified Ashworth Scale score for wrist flexors (−1.64±0.67), Modified Ashworth Scale score for finger flexors (−1.00±0.63), F-wave amplitude (−154.09±220.86), F/M ratio (−0.18±0.24), and CUE scores (17.82±13.49). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that neurodynamic mobilization of the median nerve may be effective for upper limb spasticity control and upper limb functional improvement in tetraplegic patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8377221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Korean Society of Spine Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83772212021-08-25 Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Mobilization versus Conventional Therapy on Spasticity Reduction and Upper Limb Function in Tetraplegic Patients Saxena, Akanksha Sehgal, Stuti Jangra, Mandeep Kumar Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: The study employed a pre- and post-test experimental design. PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the effect of neurodynamic mobilization of the median nerve on upper limb spasticity in tetraplegic patients. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Spasticity is a common and potentially disabling and bothersome complication in patients with spinal cord lesion; this disorder can negatively influence the quality of life by restricting the patient’s ability to perform activities of daily living. Neural mobilization is currently used for reducing the spasticity in individuals with neurological disorders. METHODS: Twenty subjects with traumatic spinal cord injury (level C5–C8) and upper limb spasticity in the finger and wrist flexors were enrolled. They were randomly allocated to two different groups using a computer-generated randomization schedule: group I comprised the neurodynamic mobilization group (n=11) and group II was the conventional therapy group (n=9); the subjects were administered therapy for 5 days every week for a period of 4 weeks. Upper limb spasticity was assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale for wrist and finger flexors; F-wave amplitude, latency, and F-wave/M-wave amplitude ratio (F/M ratio) were examined using the F-wave scores of the median nerve; and upper limb function was determined using the Capabilities of Upper Extremity (CUE) Questionnaire. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of intervention, between-group comparisons showed a significant difference in the pre-intervention and postintervention scores on the Modified Ashworth Scale score for wrist flexors (−1.64±0.67), Modified Ashworth Scale score for finger flexors (−1.00±0.63), F-wave amplitude (−154.09±220.86), F/M ratio (−0.18±0.24), and CUE scores (17.82±13.49). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that neurodynamic mobilization of the median nerve may be effective for upper limb spasticity control and upper limb functional improvement in tetraplegic patients. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2021-08 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8377221/ /pubmed/33059433 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0146 Text en Copyright © 2021 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Saxena, Akanksha Sehgal, Stuti Jangra, Mandeep Kumar Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Mobilization versus Conventional Therapy on Spasticity Reduction and Upper Limb Function in Tetraplegic Patients |
title | Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Mobilization versus Conventional Therapy on Spasticity Reduction and Upper Limb Function in Tetraplegic Patients |
title_full | Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Mobilization versus Conventional Therapy on Spasticity Reduction and Upper Limb Function in Tetraplegic Patients |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Mobilization versus Conventional Therapy on Spasticity Reduction and Upper Limb Function in Tetraplegic Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Mobilization versus Conventional Therapy on Spasticity Reduction and Upper Limb Function in Tetraplegic Patients |
title_short | Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Mobilization versus Conventional Therapy on Spasticity Reduction and Upper Limb Function in Tetraplegic Patients |
title_sort | effectiveness of neurodynamic mobilization versus conventional therapy on spasticity reduction and upper limb function in tetraplegic patients |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33059433 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0146 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saxenaakanksha effectivenessofneurodynamicmobilizationversusconventionaltherapyonspasticityreductionandupperlimbfunctionintetraplegicpatients AT sehgalstuti effectivenessofneurodynamicmobilizationversusconventionaltherapyonspasticityreductionandupperlimbfunctionintetraplegicpatients AT jangramandeepkumar effectivenessofneurodynamicmobilizationversusconventionaltherapyonspasticityreductionandupperlimbfunctionintetraplegicpatients |