Cargando…

Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Mobilization versus Conventional Therapy on Spasticity Reduction and Upper Limb Function in Tetraplegic Patients

STUDY DESIGN: The study employed a pre- and post-test experimental design. PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the effect of neurodynamic mobilization of the median nerve on upper limb spasticity in tetraplegic patients. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Spasticity is a common and potentially disabling...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saxena, Akanksha, Sehgal, Stuti, Jangra, Mandeep Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33059433
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0146
_version_ 1783740612873289728
author Saxena, Akanksha
Sehgal, Stuti
Jangra, Mandeep Kumar
author_facet Saxena, Akanksha
Sehgal, Stuti
Jangra, Mandeep Kumar
author_sort Saxena, Akanksha
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: The study employed a pre- and post-test experimental design. PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the effect of neurodynamic mobilization of the median nerve on upper limb spasticity in tetraplegic patients. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Spasticity is a common and potentially disabling and bothersome complication in patients with spinal cord lesion; this disorder can negatively influence the quality of life by restricting the patient’s ability to perform activities of daily living. Neural mobilization is currently used for reducing the spasticity in individuals with neurological disorders. METHODS: Twenty subjects with traumatic spinal cord injury (level C5–C8) and upper limb spasticity in the finger and wrist flexors were enrolled. They were randomly allocated to two different groups using a computer-generated randomization schedule: group I comprised the neurodynamic mobilization group (n=11) and group II was the conventional therapy group (n=9); the subjects were administered therapy for 5 days every week for a period of 4 weeks. Upper limb spasticity was assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale for wrist and finger flexors; F-wave amplitude, latency, and F-wave/M-wave amplitude ratio (F/M ratio) were examined using the F-wave scores of the median nerve; and upper limb function was determined using the Capabilities of Upper Extremity (CUE) Questionnaire. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of intervention, between-group comparisons showed a significant difference in the pre-intervention and postintervention scores on the Modified Ashworth Scale score for wrist flexors (−1.64±0.67), Modified Ashworth Scale score for finger flexors (−1.00±0.63), F-wave amplitude (−154.09±220.86), F/M ratio (−0.18±0.24), and CUE scores (17.82±13.49). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that neurodynamic mobilization of the median nerve may be effective for upper limb spasticity control and upper limb functional improvement in tetraplegic patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8377221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83772212021-08-25 Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Mobilization versus Conventional Therapy on Spasticity Reduction and Upper Limb Function in Tetraplegic Patients Saxena, Akanksha Sehgal, Stuti Jangra, Mandeep Kumar Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: The study employed a pre- and post-test experimental design. PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the effect of neurodynamic mobilization of the median nerve on upper limb spasticity in tetraplegic patients. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Spasticity is a common and potentially disabling and bothersome complication in patients with spinal cord lesion; this disorder can negatively influence the quality of life by restricting the patient’s ability to perform activities of daily living. Neural mobilization is currently used for reducing the spasticity in individuals with neurological disorders. METHODS: Twenty subjects with traumatic spinal cord injury (level C5–C8) and upper limb spasticity in the finger and wrist flexors were enrolled. They were randomly allocated to two different groups using a computer-generated randomization schedule: group I comprised the neurodynamic mobilization group (n=11) and group II was the conventional therapy group (n=9); the subjects were administered therapy for 5 days every week for a period of 4 weeks. Upper limb spasticity was assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale for wrist and finger flexors; F-wave amplitude, latency, and F-wave/M-wave amplitude ratio (F/M ratio) were examined using the F-wave scores of the median nerve; and upper limb function was determined using the Capabilities of Upper Extremity (CUE) Questionnaire. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of intervention, between-group comparisons showed a significant difference in the pre-intervention and postintervention scores on the Modified Ashworth Scale score for wrist flexors (−1.64±0.67), Modified Ashworth Scale score for finger flexors (−1.00±0.63), F-wave amplitude (−154.09±220.86), F/M ratio (−0.18±0.24), and CUE scores (17.82±13.49). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that neurodynamic mobilization of the median nerve may be effective for upper limb spasticity control and upper limb functional improvement in tetraplegic patients. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2021-08 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8377221/ /pubmed/33059433 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0146 Text en Copyright © 2021 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Saxena, Akanksha
Sehgal, Stuti
Jangra, Mandeep Kumar
Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Mobilization versus Conventional Therapy on Spasticity Reduction and Upper Limb Function in Tetraplegic Patients
title Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Mobilization versus Conventional Therapy on Spasticity Reduction and Upper Limb Function in Tetraplegic Patients
title_full Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Mobilization versus Conventional Therapy on Spasticity Reduction and Upper Limb Function in Tetraplegic Patients
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Mobilization versus Conventional Therapy on Spasticity Reduction and Upper Limb Function in Tetraplegic Patients
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Mobilization versus Conventional Therapy on Spasticity Reduction and Upper Limb Function in Tetraplegic Patients
title_short Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Mobilization versus Conventional Therapy on Spasticity Reduction and Upper Limb Function in Tetraplegic Patients
title_sort effectiveness of neurodynamic mobilization versus conventional therapy on spasticity reduction and upper limb function in tetraplegic patients
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33059433
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0146
work_keys_str_mv AT saxenaakanksha effectivenessofneurodynamicmobilizationversusconventionaltherapyonspasticityreductionandupperlimbfunctionintetraplegicpatients
AT sehgalstuti effectivenessofneurodynamicmobilizationversusconventionaltherapyonspasticityreductionandupperlimbfunctionintetraplegicpatients
AT jangramandeepkumar effectivenessofneurodynamicmobilizationversusconventionaltherapyonspasticityreductionandupperlimbfunctionintetraplegicpatients