Cargando…

Exploring Potential Signals of Selection for Disordered Residues in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Proteins

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are an important class of proteins in all domains of life for their functional importance. However, how nature has shaped the disorder potential of prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins is still not clearly known. Randomly generated sequences are free of any se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panda, Arup, Tuller, Tamir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33346088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2020.06.005
_version_ 1783740618469539840
author Panda, Arup
Tuller, Tamir
author_facet Panda, Arup
Tuller, Tamir
author_sort Panda, Arup
collection PubMed
description Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are an important class of proteins in all domains of life for their functional importance. However, how nature has shaped the disorder potential of prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins is still not clearly known. Randomly generated sequences are free of any selective constraints, thus these sequences are commonly used as null models. Considering different types of random protein models, here we seek to understand how the disorder potential of natural eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteins differs from random sequences. Comparing proteome-wide disorder content between real and random sequences of 12 model organisms, we noticed that eukaryotic proteins are enriched in disordered regions compared to random sequences, but in prokaryotes such regions are depleted. By analyzing the position-wise disorder profile, we show that there is a generally higher disorder near the N- and C-terminal regions of eukaryotic proteins as compared to the random models; however, either no or a weak such trend was found in prokaryotic proteins. Moreover, here we show that this preference is not caused by the amino acid or nucleotide composition at the respective sites. Instead, these regions were found to be endowed with a higher fraction of protein–protein binding sites, suggesting their functional importance. We discuss several possible explanations for this pattern, such as improving the efficiency of protein–protein interaction, ribosome movement during translation, and post-translational modification. However, further studies are needed to clearly understand the biophysical mechanisms causing the trend.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8377245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83772452021-08-24 Exploring Potential Signals of Selection for Disordered Residues in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Proteins Panda, Arup Tuller, Tamir Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics Original Research Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are an important class of proteins in all domains of life for their functional importance. However, how nature has shaped the disorder potential of prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins is still not clearly known. Randomly generated sequences are free of any selective constraints, thus these sequences are commonly used as null models. Considering different types of random protein models, here we seek to understand how the disorder potential of natural eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteins differs from random sequences. Comparing proteome-wide disorder content between real and random sequences of 12 model organisms, we noticed that eukaryotic proteins are enriched in disordered regions compared to random sequences, but in prokaryotes such regions are depleted. By analyzing the position-wise disorder profile, we show that there is a generally higher disorder near the N- and C-terminal regions of eukaryotic proteins as compared to the random models; however, either no or a weak such trend was found in prokaryotic proteins. Moreover, here we show that this preference is not caused by the amino acid or nucleotide composition at the respective sites. Instead, these regions were found to be endowed with a higher fraction of protein–protein binding sites, suggesting their functional importance. We discuss several possible explanations for this pattern, such as improving the efficiency of protein–protein interaction, ribosome movement during translation, and post-translational modification. However, further studies are needed to clearly understand the biophysical mechanisms causing the trend. Elsevier 2020-10 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8377245/ /pubmed/33346088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2020.06.005 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Panda, Arup
Tuller, Tamir
Exploring Potential Signals of Selection for Disordered Residues in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Proteins
title Exploring Potential Signals of Selection for Disordered Residues in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Proteins
title_full Exploring Potential Signals of Selection for Disordered Residues in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Proteins
title_fullStr Exploring Potential Signals of Selection for Disordered Residues in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Proteins
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Potential Signals of Selection for Disordered Residues in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Proteins
title_short Exploring Potential Signals of Selection for Disordered Residues in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Proteins
title_sort exploring potential signals of selection for disordered residues in prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33346088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2020.06.005
work_keys_str_mv AT pandaarup exploringpotentialsignalsofselectionfordisorderedresiduesinprokaryoticandeukaryoticproteins
AT tullertamir exploringpotentialsignalsofselectionfordisorderedresiduesinprokaryoticandeukaryoticproteins