Cargando…

Evaluating the Arrhenius equation for developmental processes

The famous Arrhenius equation is well suited to describing the temperature dependence of chemical reactions but has also been used for complicated biological processes. Here, we evaluate how well the simple Arrhenius equation predicts complex multi‐step biological processes, using frog and fruit fly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crapse, Joseph, Pappireddi, Nishant, Gupta, Meera, Shvartsman, Stanislav Y, Wieschaus, Eric, Wühr, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34414660
http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/msb.20209895
_version_ 1783740660752318464
author Crapse, Joseph
Pappireddi, Nishant
Gupta, Meera
Shvartsman, Stanislav Y
Wieschaus, Eric
Wühr, Martin
author_facet Crapse, Joseph
Pappireddi, Nishant
Gupta, Meera
Shvartsman, Stanislav Y
Wieschaus, Eric
Wühr, Martin
author_sort Crapse, Joseph
collection PubMed
description The famous Arrhenius equation is well suited to describing the temperature dependence of chemical reactions but has also been used for complicated biological processes. Here, we evaluate how well the simple Arrhenius equation predicts complex multi‐step biological processes, using frog and fruit fly embryogenesis as two canonical models. We find that the Arrhenius equation provides a good approximation for the temperature dependence of embryogenesis, even though individual developmental intervals scale differently with temperature. At low and high temperatures, however, we observed significant departures from idealized Arrhenius Law behavior. When we model multi‐step reactions of idealized chemical networks, we are unable to generate comparable deviations from linearity. In contrast, we find the two enzymes GAPDH and β‐galactosidase show non‐linearity in the Arrhenius plot similar to our observations of embryonic development. Thus, we find that complex embryonic development can be well approximated by the simple Arrhenius equation regardless of non‐uniform developmental scaling and propose that the observed departure from this law likely results more from non‐idealized individual steps rather than from the complexity of the system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8377445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83774452021-08-27 Evaluating the Arrhenius equation for developmental processes Crapse, Joseph Pappireddi, Nishant Gupta, Meera Shvartsman, Stanislav Y Wieschaus, Eric Wühr, Martin Mol Syst Biol Reports The famous Arrhenius equation is well suited to describing the temperature dependence of chemical reactions but has also been used for complicated biological processes. Here, we evaluate how well the simple Arrhenius equation predicts complex multi‐step biological processes, using frog and fruit fly embryogenesis as two canonical models. We find that the Arrhenius equation provides a good approximation for the temperature dependence of embryogenesis, even though individual developmental intervals scale differently with temperature. At low and high temperatures, however, we observed significant departures from idealized Arrhenius Law behavior. When we model multi‐step reactions of idealized chemical networks, we are unable to generate comparable deviations from linearity. In contrast, we find the two enzymes GAPDH and β‐galactosidase show non‐linearity in the Arrhenius plot similar to our observations of embryonic development. Thus, we find that complex embryonic development can be well approximated by the simple Arrhenius equation regardless of non‐uniform developmental scaling and propose that the observed departure from this law likely results more from non‐idealized individual steps rather than from the complexity of the system. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8377445/ /pubmed/34414660 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/msb.20209895 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reports
Crapse, Joseph
Pappireddi, Nishant
Gupta, Meera
Shvartsman, Stanislav Y
Wieschaus, Eric
Wühr, Martin
Evaluating the Arrhenius equation for developmental processes
title Evaluating the Arrhenius equation for developmental processes
title_full Evaluating the Arrhenius equation for developmental processes
title_fullStr Evaluating the Arrhenius equation for developmental processes
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Arrhenius equation for developmental processes
title_short Evaluating the Arrhenius equation for developmental processes
title_sort evaluating the arrhenius equation for developmental processes
topic Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34414660
http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/msb.20209895
work_keys_str_mv AT crapsejoseph evaluatingthearrheniusequationfordevelopmentalprocesses
AT pappireddinishant evaluatingthearrheniusequationfordevelopmentalprocesses
AT guptameera evaluatingthearrheniusequationfordevelopmentalprocesses
AT shvartsmanstanislavy evaluatingthearrheniusequationfordevelopmentalprocesses
AT wieschauseric evaluatingthearrheniusequationfordevelopmentalprocesses
AT wuhrmartin evaluatingthearrheniusequationfordevelopmentalprocesses