Cargando…

Direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing

DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mechanism involved in proper genome function. Bisulfite pyrosequencing (PSQ) is a commonly used technique to quantify DNA methylation. Although very accurate, bisulfite pyrosequencing can be expensive and time consuming for large-scale quantitative DNA meth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: King, Dillon E., Sparling, A. Clare, Joglekar, Rashmi, Meyer, Joel N., Murphy, Susan K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Caltech Library 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34423283
http://dx.doi.org/10.17912/micropub.biology.000444
_version_ 1783740676233494528
author King, Dillon E.
Sparling, A. Clare
Joglekar, Rashmi
Meyer, Joel N.
Murphy, Susan K.
author_facet King, Dillon E.
Sparling, A. Clare
Joglekar, Rashmi
Meyer, Joel N.
Murphy, Susan K.
author_sort King, Dillon E.
collection PubMed
description DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mechanism involved in proper genome function. Bisulfite pyrosequencing (PSQ) is a commonly used technique to quantify DNA methylation. Although very accurate, bisulfite pyrosequencing can be expensive and time consuming for large-scale quantitative DNA methylation analysis at the single nucleotide level. High throughput DNA methylation sequencing has the potential to address these limitations, but its comparability to other methylation detection methods has not been well studied. We compared QIAseq Targeted Methyl Panel technologies (QMS) and PSQ by analyzing four CpG sites within four genes involved in neurodevelopment. QMS and PSQ had an average 5.6% difference in the detected level of DNA methylation for the same four CpG sites. However, we observed a strong correlation in the levels of methylation across all four CpG sites between the two technologies. These findings demonstrate the comparability of QMS relative to PSQ in the ability to accurately quantify DNA methylation at specific CpG sites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8377520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Caltech Library
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83775202021-08-20 Direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing King, Dillon E. Sparling, A. Clare Joglekar, Rashmi Meyer, Joel N. Murphy, Susan K. MicroPubl Biol New Finding DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mechanism involved in proper genome function. Bisulfite pyrosequencing (PSQ) is a commonly used technique to quantify DNA methylation. Although very accurate, bisulfite pyrosequencing can be expensive and time consuming for large-scale quantitative DNA methylation analysis at the single nucleotide level. High throughput DNA methylation sequencing has the potential to address these limitations, but its comparability to other methylation detection methods has not been well studied. We compared QIAseq Targeted Methyl Panel technologies (QMS) and PSQ by analyzing four CpG sites within four genes involved in neurodevelopment. QMS and PSQ had an average 5.6% difference in the detected level of DNA methylation for the same four CpG sites. However, we observed a strong correlation in the levels of methylation across all four CpG sites between the two technologies. These findings demonstrate the comparability of QMS relative to PSQ in the ability to accurately quantify DNA methylation at specific CpG sites. Caltech Library 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8377520/ /pubmed/34423283 http://dx.doi.org/10.17912/micropub.biology.000444 Text en Copyright: © 2021 by the authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle New Finding
King, Dillon E.
Sparling, A. Clare
Joglekar, Rashmi
Meyer, Joel N.
Murphy, Susan K.
Direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing
title Direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing
title_full Direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing
title_fullStr Direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing
title_short Direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing
title_sort direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing
topic New Finding
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34423283
http://dx.doi.org/10.17912/micropub.biology.000444
work_keys_str_mv AT kingdillone directcomparisonsofbisulfitepyrosequencingversustargetedbisulfitesequencing
AT sparlingaclare directcomparisonsofbisulfitepyrosequencingversustargetedbisulfitesequencing
AT joglekarrashmi directcomparisonsofbisulfitepyrosequencingversustargetedbisulfitesequencing
AT meyerjoeln directcomparisonsofbisulfitepyrosequencingversustargetedbisulfitesequencing
AT murphysusank directcomparisonsofbisulfitepyrosequencingversustargetedbisulfitesequencing