Cargando…
Direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing
DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mechanism involved in proper genome function. Bisulfite pyrosequencing (PSQ) is a commonly used technique to quantify DNA methylation. Although very accurate, bisulfite pyrosequencing can be expensive and time consuming for large-scale quantitative DNA meth...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Caltech Library
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34423283 http://dx.doi.org/10.17912/micropub.biology.000444 |
_version_ | 1783740676233494528 |
---|---|
author | King, Dillon E. Sparling, A. Clare Joglekar, Rashmi Meyer, Joel N. Murphy, Susan K. |
author_facet | King, Dillon E. Sparling, A. Clare Joglekar, Rashmi Meyer, Joel N. Murphy, Susan K. |
author_sort | King, Dillon E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mechanism involved in proper genome function. Bisulfite pyrosequencing (PSQ) is a commonly used technique to quantify DNA methylation. Although very accurate, bisulfite pyrosequencing can be expensive and time consuming for large-scale quantitative DNA methylation analysis at the single nucleotide level. High throughput DNA methylation sequencing has the potential to address these limitations, but its comparability to other methylation detection methods has not been well studied. We compared QIAseq Targeted Methyl Panel technologies (QMS) and PSQ by analyzing four CpG sites within four genes involved in neurodevelopment. QMS and PSQ had an average 5.6% difference in the detected level of DNA methylation for the same four CpG sites. However, we observed a strong correlation in the levels of methylation across all four CpG sites between the two technologies. These findings demonstrate the comparability of QMS relative to PSQ in the ability to accurately quantify DNA methylation at specific CpG sites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8377520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Caltech Library |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83775202021-08-20 Direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing King, Dillon E. Sparling, A. Clare Joglekar, Rashmi Meyer, Joel N. Murphy, Susan K. MicroPubl Biol New Finding DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mechanism involved in proper genome function. Bisulfite pyrosequencing (PSQ) is a commonly used technique to quantify DNA methylation. Although very accurate, bisulfite pyrosequencing can be expensive and time consuming for large-scale quantitative DNA methylation analysis at the single nucleotide level. High throughput DNA methylation sequencing has the potential to address these limitations, but its comparability to other methylation detection methods has not been well studied. We compared QIAseq Targeted Methyl Panel technologies (QMS) and PSQ by analyzing four CpG sites within four genes involved in neurodevelopment. QMS and PSQ had an average 5.6% difference in the detected level of DNA methylation for the same four CpG sites. However, we observed a strong correlation in the levels of methylation across all four CpG sites between the two technologies. These findings demonstrate the comparability of QMS relative to PSQ in the ability to accurately quantify DNA methylation at specific CpG sites. Caltech Library 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8377520/ /pubmed/34423283 http://dx.doi.org/10.17912/micropub.biology.000444 Text en Copyright: © 2021 by the authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | New Finding King, Dillon E. Sparling, A. Clare Joglekar, Rashmi Meyer, Joel N. Murphy, Susan K. Direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing |
title | Direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing |
title_full | Direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing |
title_fullStr | Direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing |
title_full_unstemmed | Direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing |
title_short | Direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing |
title_sort | direct comparisons of bisulfite pyrosequencing versus targeted bisulfite sequencing |
topic | New Finding |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34423283 http://dx.doi.org/10.17912/micropub.biology.000444 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kingdillone directcomparisonsofbisulfitepyrosequencingversustargetedbisulfitesequencing AT sparlingaclare directcomparisonsofbisulfitepyrosequencingversustargetedbisulfitesequencing AT joglekarrashmi directcomparisonsofbisulfitepyrosequencingversustargetedbisulfitesequencing AT meyerjoeln directcomparisonsofbisulfitepyrosequencingversustargetedbisulfitesequencing AT murphysusank directcomparisonsofbisulfitepyrosequencingversustargetedbisulfitesequencing |