Cargando…

A staged approach to address youth unresponsive to initial obesity intervention: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Maintenance interventions inherently require BMI improvement to maintain. This overlooks individuals initially unresponsive to obesity interventions. Staged pediatric clinical treatment guidelines were adapted to the school setting to develop an escalated treatment option for i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arlinghaus, Katherine R., O’Connor, Daniel P., Ledoux, Tracey A., Hughes, Sheryl O., Johnston, Craig A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34417553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00940-0
_version_ 1783740694730375168
author Arlinghaus, Katherine R.
O’Connor, Daniel P.
Ledoux, Tracey A.
Hughes, Sheryl O.
Johnston, Craig A.
author_facet Arlinghaus, Katherine R.
O’Connor, Daniel P.
Ledoux, Tracey A.
Hughes, Sheryl O.
Johnston, Craig A.
author_sort Arlinghaus, Katherine R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Maintenance interventions inherently require BMI improvement to maintain. This overlooks individuals initially unresponsive to obesity interventions. Staged pediatric clinical treatment guidelines were adapted to the school setting to develop an escalated treatment option for individuals initially unresponsive. This staged randomized controlled trial examined differences between escalated treatment (Take CHARGE!) and a maintenance program (PE Planners). Take CHARGE was hypothesized to have greater improvements in BMI as a percentage of the 95th BMI Percentile (%BMIp95) than PE Planners. SUBJECTS/METHODS: From 2018 to 2020, 171 middle and high schoolers (BMI Percentile ≥ 85) were recruited from a Houston school district to participate in a staged obesity intervention in their physical education (PE) class. After receiving a semester-long intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) with established efficacy, all participants were randomized to Take CHARGE (n = 85) or PE Planners (n = 86). Take CHARGE escalated the behavioral treatment of obesity received in ILI with more frequent individual sessions, additional opportunities for parental and school staff involvement, and increased mentorship from trained college students. PE Planners allowed participants to decide how they wanted to be active in PE class. Mixed linear modeling examined %BMIp95 overtime between groups. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT04362280). RESULTS: Participants were 13.63 ± 1.32 years old; 59% were female, and 85% were Hispanic. Among those initially unresponsive to ILI, Take CHARGE had significantly greater decreases in %BMIp95 than PE Planners (β = −0.01, p < 0.01). Conversely, among those initially responsive, Take CHARGE had significantly smaller decreases in %BMIp95 than PE Planners (β = 0.02, p < 0.05). Intention-to-treat analysis had similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Participant outcomes in semester two differed based on initial response. Individuals responsive to initial intervention were most likely to benefit from a maintenance intervention and those initially unresponsive benefited more from escalated treatment. This indicates the need for staged intervention protocols to better address obesity in the school setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8377703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83777032021-08-20 A staged approach to address youth unresponsive to initial obesity intervention: a randomized clinical trial Arlinghaus, Katherine R. O’Connor, Daniel P. Ledoux, Tracey A. Hughes, Sheryl O. Johnston, Craig A. Int J Obes (Lond) Article BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Maintenance interventions inherently require BMI improvement to maintain. This overlooks individuals initially unresponsive to obesity interventions. Staged pediatric clinical treatment guidelines were adapted to the school setting to develop an escalated treatment option for individuals initially unresponsive. This staged randomized controlled trial examined differences between escalated treatment (Take CHARGE!) and a maintenance program (PE Planners). Take CHARGE was hypothesized to have greater improvements in BMI as a percentage of the 95th BMI Percentile (%BMIp95) than PE Planners. SUBJECTS/METHODS: From 2018 to 2020, 171 middle and high schoolers (BMI Percentile ≥ 85) were recruited from a Houston school district to participate in a staged obesity intervention in their physical education (PE) class. After receiving a semester-long intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) with established efficacy, all participants were randomized to Take CHARGE (n = 85) or PE Planners (n = 86). Take CHARGE escalated the behavioral treatment of obesity received in ILI with more frequent individual sessions, additional opportunities for parental and school staff involvement, and increased mentorship from trained college students. PE Planners allowed participants to decide how they wanted to be active in PE class. Mixed linear modeling examined %BMIp95 overtime between groups. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT04362280). RESULTS: Participants were 13.63 ± 1.32 years old; 59% were female, and 85% were Hispanic. Among those initially unresponsive to ILI, Take CHARGE had significantly greater decreases in %BMIp95 than PE Planners (β = −0.01, p < 0.01). Conversely, among those initially responsive, Take CHARGE had significantly smaller decreases in %BMIp95 than PE Planners (β = 0.02, p < 0.05). Intention-to-treat analysis had similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Participant outcomes in semester two differed based on initial response. Individuals responsive to initial intervention were most likely to benefit from a maintenance intervention and those initially unresponsive benefited more from escalated treatment. This indicates the need for staged intervention protocols to better address obesity in the school setting. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8377703/ /pubmed/34417553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00940-0 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Arlinghaus, Katherine R.
O’Connor, Daniel P.
Ledoux, Tracey A.
Hughes, Sheryl O.
Johnston, Craig A.
A staged approach to address youth unresponsive to initial obesity intervention: a randomized clinical trial
title A staged approach to address youth unresponsive to initial obesity intervention: a randomized clinical trial
title_full A staged approach to address youth unresponsive to initial obesity intervention: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr A staged approach to address youth unresponsive to initial obesity intervention: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed A staged approach to address youth unresponsive to initial obesity intervention: a randomized clinical trial
title_short A staged approach to address youth unresponsive to initial obesity intervention: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort staged approach to address youth unresponsive to initial obesity intervention: a randomized clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34417553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00940-0
work_keys_str_mv AT arlinghauskatheriner astagedapproachtoaddressyouthunresponsivetoinitialobesityinterventionarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT oconnordanielp astagedapproachtoaddressyouthunresponsivetoinitialobesityinterventionarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ledouxtraceya astagedapproachtoaddressyouthunresponsivetoinitialobesityinterventionarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hughessherylo astagedapproachtoaddressyouthunresponsivetoinitialobesityinterventionarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT johnstoncraiga astagedapproachtoaddressyouthunresponsivetoinitialobesityinterventionarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT arlinghauskatheriner stagedapproachtoaddressyouthunresponsivetoinitialobesityinterventionarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT oconnordanielp stagedapproachtoaddressyouthunresponsivetoinitialobesityinterventionarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ledouxtraceya stagedapproachtoaddressyouthunresponsivetoinitialobesityinterventionarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hughessherylo stagedapproachtoaddressyouthunresponsivetoinitialobesityinterventionarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT johnstoncraiga stagedapproachtoaddressyouthunresponsivetoinitialobesityinterventionarandomizedclinicaltrial