Cargando…

A Case for the Non-Neurologist Telestroke Provider

Introduction: Telestroke networks have effectively increased the number of ischemic stroke patients who have access to acute stroke therapy. However, the availability of a dedicated group of stroke subspecialists is not always feasible. We hypothesize that rates of tPA recommendation, sensitivity of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Justin, Petrone, Ashley, Adcock, Amelia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34421782
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.651519
_version_ 1783740698668826624
author Choi, Justin
Petrone, Ashley
Adcock, Amelia
author_facet Choi, Justin
Petrone, Ashley
Adcock, Amelia
author_sort Choi, Justin
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Telestroke networks have effectively increased the number of ischemic stroke patients who have access to acute stroke therapy. However, the availability of a dedicated group of stroke subspecialists is not always feasible. We hypothesize that rates of tPA recommendation, sensitivity of final diagnosis, and post-tPA hemorrhagic complications do not differ significantly between neurologists and an emergency-medicine physician during telestroke consultations. Methods: Retrospective review of all telestroke consults performed at a comprehensive stroke center over 1 year. Statistical analysis: Chi squared test. Results: Three hundred and three consults were performed among 6 spoke sites. 16% (48/303) were completed by the emergency medicine physician; 25% (76/303) were performed by non-stroke-trained neurologists, and 59% (179/303) were completed by a board-certified Vascular Neurologist. Overall rate of tPA recommendation was 40% (104/255), 38% (18/48), 41% (73/179), and 41% (31/76) among the all neurology-trained, emergency medicine-trained, stroke neurology-trained and other neurology- trained provider groups, respectively (p = 0.427). Sensitivity of final stroke diagnosis was 77% (14/18) and 72% (75/104) in the emergency-medicine trained and neurology-trained provider groups (p = 0.777) No symptomatic hemorrhagic complications following the administration of tPA via telestroke consultation occurred in any group over this time period. One asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was observed (0.96% or 1/104) in the neurology-trained provider group. Discussion/Conclusion: Our results did not illustrate any statistically significant difference between care provided by an emergency medicine-trained physician and neurologists during telestroke consultation. While our study is limited by its relatively low numbers, it suggests that identifying a non-neurologist provider who has requisite clinical experience with acute stroke patients can safely and appropriately provide telestroke consultation. The lack of formerly trained neurologists, therefore, may not need to serve as an impediment to building an effective telestroke network. Future efforts should be focused on illuminating all strategies that facilitate sustainable telestroke implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8377720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83777202021-08-21 A Case for the Non-Neurologist Telestroke Provider Choi, Justin Petrone, Ashley Adcock, Amelia Front Neurol Neurology Introduction: Telestroke networks have effectively increased the number of ischemic stroke patients who have access to acute stroke therapy. However, the availability of a dedicated group of stroke subspecialists is not always feasible. We hypothesize that rates of tPA recommendation, sensitivity of final diagnosis, and post-tPA hemorrhagic complications do not differ significantly between neurologists and an emergency-medicine physician during telestroke consultations. Methods: Retrospective review of all telestroke consults performed at a comprehensive stroke center over 1 year. Statistical analysis: Chi squared test. Results: Three hundred and three consults were performed among 6 spoke sites. 16% (48/303) were completed by the emergency medicine physician; 25% (76/303) were performed by non-stroke-trained neurologists, and 59% (179/303) were completed by a board-certified Vascular Neurologist. Overall rate of tPA recommendation was 40% (104/255), 38% (18/48), 41% (73/179), and 41% (31/76) among the all neurology-trained, emergency medicine-trained, stroke neurology-trained and other neurology- trained provider groups, respectively (p = 0.427). Sensitivity of final stroke diagnosis was 77% (14/18) and 72% (75/104) in the emergency-medicine trained and neurology-trained provider groups (p = 0.777) No symptomatic hemorrhagic complications following the administration of tPA via telestroke consultation occurred in any group over this time period. One asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was observed (0.96% or 1/104) in the neurology-trained provider group. Discussion/Conclusion: Our results did not illustrate any statistically significant difference between care provided by an emergency medicine-trained physician and neurologists during telestroke consultation. While our study is limited by its relatively low numbers, it suggests that identifying a non-neurologist provider who has requisite clinical experience with acute stroke patients can safely and appropriately provide telestroke consultation. The lack of formerly trained neurologists, therefore, may not need to serve as an impediment to building an effective telestroke network. Future efforts should be focused on illuminating all strategies that facilitate sustainable telestroke implementation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8377720/ /pubmed/34421782 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.651519 Text en Copyright © 2021 Choi, Petrone and Adcock. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Choi, Justin
Petrone, Ashley
Adcock, Amelia
A Case for the Non-Neurologist Telestroke Provider
title A Case for the Non-Neurologist Telestroke Provider
title_full A Case for the Non-Neurologist Telestroke Provider
title_fullStr A Case for the Non-Neurologist Telestroke Provider
title_full_unstemmed A Case for the Non-Neurologist Telestroke Provider
title_short A Case for the Non-Neurologist Telestroke Provider
title_sort case for the non-neurologist telestroke provider
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34421782
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.651519
work_keys_str_mv AT choijustin acaseforthenonneurologisttelestrokeprovider
AT petroneashley acaseforthenonneurologisttelestrokeprovider
AT adcockamelia acaseforthenonneurologisttelestrokeprovider
AT choijustin caseforthenonneurologisttelestrokeprovider
AT petroneashley caseforthenonneurologisttelestrokeprovider
AT adcockamelia caseforthenonneurologisttelestrokeprovider