Cargando…

Identifying relevant outcomes in the progression of Alzheimer's disease; what do patients and care partners want to know about prognosis?

BACKGROUND: Prognostic studies in the context of Alzheimer's disease (AD) mainly predicted time to dementia. However, it is questionable whether onset of dementia is the most relevant outcome along the AD disease trajectory from the perspective of patients and their care partners. Therefore, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mank, Arenda, van Maurik, Ingrid S., Bakker, Els D., van de Glind, Esther M. M., Jönsson, Linus, Kramberger, Milica G., Novak, Petr, Diaz, Ana, Gove, Dianne, Scheltens, Philip, van der Flier, Wiesje M., Visser, Leonie N. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34458555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12189
_version_ 1783740708393320448
author Mank, Arenda
van Maurik, Ingrid S.
Bakker, Els D.
van de Glind, Esther M. M.
Jönsson, Linus
Kramberger, Milica G.
Novak, Petr
Diaz, Ana
Gove, Dianne
Scheltens, Philip
van der Flier, Wiesje M.
Visser, Leonie N. C.
author_facet Mank, Arenda
van Maurik, Ingrid S.
Bakker, Els D.
van de Glind, Esther M. M.
Jönsson, Linus
Kramberger, Milica G.
Novak, Petr
Diaz, Ana
Gove, Dianne
Scheltens, Philip
van der Flier, Wiesje M.
Visser, Leonie N. C.
author_sort Mank, Arenda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prognostic studies in the context of Alzheimer's disease (AD) mainly predicted time to dementia. However, it is questionable whether onset of dementia is the most relevant outcome along the AD disease trajectory from the perspective of patients and their care partners. Therefore, we aimed to identify the most relevant outcomes from the viewpoint of patients and care partners. METHODS: We used a two‐step, mixed‐methods approach. As a first step we conducted four focus groups in the Netherlands to elicit a comprehensive list of outcomes considered important by patients (n = 12) and care partners (n = 14) in the prognosis of AD. The focus groups resulted in a list of 59 items, divided into five categories. Next, in an online European survey, we asked participants (n = 232; 99 patients, 133 care partners) to rate the importance of all 59 items (5‐point Likert scale). As participants were likely to rate a large number of outcomes as “important” (4) or “very important” (5), we subsequently asked them to select the three items they considered most important. RESULTS: The top‐10 lists of items most frequently mentioned as “most important” by patients and care partners were merged into one core outcome list, comprising 13 items. Both patients and care partners selected outcomes from the category “cognition” most often, followed by items in the categories “functioning and dependency” and “physical health.” No items from the category “behavior and neuropsychiatry” and “social environment” ended up in our core list of relevant outcomes. CONCLUSION: We identified a core list of outcomes relevant to patients and care partner, and found that prognostic information related to cognitive decline, dependency, and physical health are considered most relevant by both patients and their care partners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8377775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83777752021-08-27 Identifying relevant outcomes in the progression of Alzheimer's disease; what do patients and care partners want to know about prognosis? Mank, Arenda van Maurik, Ingrid S. Bakker, Els D. van de Glind, Esther M. M. Jönsson, Linus Kramberger, Milica G. Novak, Petr Diaz, Ana Gove, Dianne Scheltens, Philip van der Flier, Wiesje M. Visser, Leonie N. C. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Research Articles BACKGROUND: Prognostic studies in the context of Alzheimer's disease (AD) mainly predicted time to dementia. However, it is questionable whether onset of dementia is the most relevant outcome along the AD disease trajectory from the perspective of patients and their care partners. Therefore, we aimed to identify the most relevant outcomes from the viewpoint of patients and care partners. METHODS: We used a two‐step, mixed‐methods approach. As a first step we conducted four focus groups in the Netherlands to elicit a comprehensive list of outcomes considered important by patients (n = 12) and care partners (n = 14) in the prognosis of AD. The focus groups resulted in a list of 59 items, divided into five categories. Next, in an online European survey, we asked participants (n = 232; 99 patients, 133 care partners) to rate the importance of all 59 items (5‐point Likert scale). As participants were likely to rate a large number of outcomes as “important” (4) or “very important” (5), we subsequently asked them to select the three items they considered most important. RESULTS: The top‐10 lists of items most frequently mentioned as “most important” by patients and care partners were merged into one core outcome list, comprising 13 items. Both patients and care partners selected outcomes from the category “cognition” most often, followed by items in the categories “functioning and dependency” and “physical health.” No items from the category “behavior and neuropsychiatry” and “social environment” ended up in our core list of relevant outcomes. CONCLUSION: We identified a core list of outcomes relevant to patients and care partner, and found that prognostic information related to cognitive decline, dependency, and physical health are considered most relevant by both patients and their care partners. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8377775/ /pubmed/34458555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12189 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Alzheimer's Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Mank, Arenda
van Maurik, Ingrid S.
Bakker, Els D.
van de Glind, Esther M. M.
Jönsson, Linus
Kramberger, Milica G.
Novak, Petr
Diaz, Ana
Gove, Dianne
Scheltens, Philip
van der Flier, Wiesje M.
Visser, Leonie N. C.
Identifying relevant outcomes in the progression of Alzheimer's disease; what do patients and care partners want to know about prognosis?
title Identifying relevant outcomes in the progression of Alzheimer's disease; what do patients and care partners want to know about prognosis?
title_full Identifying relevant outcomes in the progression of Alzheimer's disease; what do patients and care partners want to know about prognosis?
title_fullStr Identifying relevant outcomes in the progression of Alzheimer's disease; what do patients and care partners want to know about prognosis?
title_full_unstemmed Identifying relevant outcomes in the progression of Alzheimer's disease; what do patients and care partners want to know about prognosis?
title_short Identifying relevant outcomes in the progression of Alzheimer's disease; what do patients and care partners want to know about prognosis?
title_sort identifying relevant outcomes in the progression of alzheimer's disease; what do patients and care partners want to know about prognosis?
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34458555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12189
work_keys_str_mv AT mankarenda identifyingrelevantoutcomesintheprogressionofalzheimersdiseasewhatdopatientsandcarepartnerswanttoknowaboutprognosis
AT vanmaurikingrids identifyingrelevantoutcomesintheprogressionofalzheimersdiseasewhatdopatientsandcarepartnerswanttoknowaboutprognosis
AT bakkerelsd identifyingrelevantoutcomesintheprogressionofalzheimersdiseasewhatdopatientsandcarepartnerswanttoknowaboutprognosis
AT vandeglindesthermm identifyingrelevantoutcomesintheprogressionofalzheimersdiseasewhatdopatientsandcarepartnerswanttoknowaboutprognosis
AT jonssonlinus identifyingrelevantoutcomesintheprogressionofalzheimersdiseasewhatdopatientsandcarepartnerswanttoknowaboutprognosis
AT krambergermilicag identifyingrelevantoutcomesintheprogressionofalzheimersdiseasewhatdopatientsandcarepartnerswanttoknowaboutprognosis
AT novakpetr identifyingrelevantoutcomesintheprogressionofalzheimersdiseasewhatdopatientsandcarepartnerswanttoknowaboutprognosis
AT diazana identifyingrelevantoutcomesintheprogressionofalzheimersdiseasewhatdopatientsandcarepartnerswanttoknowaboutprognosis
AT govedianne identifyingrelevantoutcomesintheprogressionofalzheimersdiseasewhatdopatientsandcarepartnerswanttoknowaboutprognosis
AT scheltensphilip identifyingrelevantoutcomesintheprogressionofalzheimersdiseasewhatdopatientsandcarepartnerswanttoknowaboutprognosis
AT vanderflierwiesjem identifyingrelevantoutcomesintheprogressionofalzheimersdiseasewhatdopatientsandcarepartnerswanttoknowaboutprognosis
AT visserleonienc identifyingrelevantoutcomesintheprogressionofalzheimersdiseasewhatdopatientsandcarepartnerswanttoknowaboutprognosis