Cargando…

Findings from the patch augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) feasibility study

BACKGROUND: A rotator cuff tear is a common disabling shoulder problem. Symptoms include pain, weakness, lack of mobility and sleep disturbance. Many patients require surgery to repair the tear; however, there is a high failure rate. There is a pressing need to improve the outcome of rotator cuff su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cook, Jonathan A., Baldwin, Mathew, Cooper, Cushla, Nagra, Navraj S., Crocker, Joanna C., Glaze, Molly, Greenall, Gemma, Rangan, Amar, Kottam, Lucksy, Rees, Jonathan L., Farrar-Hockley, Dair, Merritt, Naomi, Hopewell, Sally, Beard, David, Thomas, Michael, Dritsaki, Melina, Carr, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34416915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00899-9
_version_ 1783740721272979456
author Cook, Jonathan A.
Baldwin, Mathew
Cooper, Cushla
Nagra, Navraj S.
Crocker, Joanna C.
Glaze, Molly
Greenall, Gemma
Rangan, Amar
Kottam, Lucksy
Rees, Jonathan L.
Farrar-Hockley, Dair
Merritt, Naomi
Hopewell, Sally
Beard, David
Thomas, Michael
Dritsaki, Melina
Carr, Andrew J.
author_facet Cook, Jonathan A.
Baldwin, Mathew
Cooper, Cushla
Nagra, Navraj S.
Crocker, Joanna C.
Glaze, Molly
Greenall, Gemma
Rangan, Amar
Kottam, Lucksy
Rees, Jonathan L.
Farrar-Hockley, Dair
Merritt, Naomi
Hopewell, Sally
Beard, David
Thomas, Michael
Dritsaki, Melina
Carr, Andrew J.
author_sort Cook, Jonathan A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A rotator cuff tear is a common disabling shoulder problem. Symptoms include pain, weakness, lack of mobility and sleep disturbance. Many patients require surgery to repair the tear; however, there is a high failure rate. There is a pressing need to improve the outcome of rotator cuff surgery. The use of patch augmentation to provide support to the healing process and improve patient outcomes holds new promise. Different materials (e.g. human/animal skin or intestine tissue, and completely synthetic materials) and processes (e.g. woven or a mesh) have been used to produce patches. However, clinical evidence on their use is limited. The patch augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) feasibility study aimed to determine the design of a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a patch to augment surgical repair of the rotator cuff that is both acceptable to stakeholders and feasible. METHODS: A mixed methods feasibility study of conducing a subsequent RCT. The project involved six stages: a systematic review of clinical evidence; a survey of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society’s (BESS) surgical membership; a survey of surgeon trialists; focus groups and interviews with stakeholders; a two-round Delphi study administered via online questionnaires and a 2-day consensus meeting. RESULTS: The BESS surgeons’ survey identified a variety of patches in use (105 (21%) responses received). Twenty-four surgeons (77%) completed the trialist survey relating to trial design. Four focus groups were conducted involving 24 stakeholders. Twenty-nine (67% of invited) individuals took part in the Delphi. Differing views were held on a number of aspects including the appropriate patient population for trial participation. Agreement on the key research questions and the outline of two potential RCTs were achieved through the Delphi study and the consensus meeting. CONCLUSIONS: Randomised comparisons of on-lay patch use for completed rotator cuff repairs, and bridging patch use for partial rotator cuff repairs were identified as areas for further research. The value of an observational study to assess safety concerns of patch use was also highlighted. The main limitation was that the findings were influenced by the participants, who might not necessarily reflect all stakeholders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8377837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83778372021-08-23 Findings from the patch augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) feasibility study Cook, Jonathan A. Baldwin, Mathew Cooper, Cushla Nagra, Navraj S. Crocker, Joanna C. Glaze, Molly Greenall, Gemma Rangan, Amar Kottam, Lucksy Rees, Jonathan L. Farrar-Hockley, Dair Merritt, Naomi Hopewell, Sally Beard, David Thomas, Michael Dritsaki, Melina Carr, Andrew J. Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: A rotator cuff tear is a common disabling shoulder problem. Symptoms include pain, weakness, lack of mobility and sleep disturbance. Many patients require surgery to repair the tear; however, there is a high failure rate. There is a pressing need to improve the outcome of rotator cuff surgery. The use of patch augmentation to provide support to the healing process and improve patient outcomes holds new promise. Different materials (e.g. human/animal skin or intestine tissue, and completely synthetic materials) and processes (e.g. woven or a mesh) have been used to produce patches. However, clinical evidence on their use is limited. The patch augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) feasibility study aimed to determine the design of a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a patch to augment surgical repair of the rotator cuff that is both acceptable to stakeholders and feasible. METHODS: A mixed methods feasibility study of conducing a subsequent RCT. The project involved six stages: a systematic review of clinical evidence; a survey of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society’s (BESS) surgical membership; a survey of surgeon trialists; focus groups and interviews with stakeholders; a two-round Delphi study administered via online questionnaires and a 2-day consensus meeting. RESULTS: The BESS surgeons’ survey identified a variety of patches in use (105 (21%) responses received). Twenty-four surgeons (77%) completed the trialist survey relating to trial design. Four focus groups were conducted involving 24 stakeholders. Twenty-nine (67% of invited) individuals took part in the Delphi. Differing views were held on a number of aspects including the appropriate patient population for trial participation. Agreement on the key research questions and the outline of two potential RCTs were achieved through the Delphi study and the consensus meeting. CONCLUSIONS: Randomised comparisons of on-lay patch use for completed rotator cuff repairs, and bridging patch use for partial rotator cuff repairs were identified as areas for further research. The value of an observational study to assess safety concerns of patch use was also highlighted. The main limitation was that the findings were influenced by the participants, who might not necessarily reflect all stakeholders. BioMed Central 2021-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8377837/ /pubmed/34416915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00899-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Cook, Jonathan A.
Baldwin, Mathew
Cooper, Cushla
Nagra, Navraj S.
Crocker, Joanna C.
Glaze, Molly
Greenall, Gemma
Rangan, Amar
Kottam, Lucksy
Rees, Jonathan L.
Farrar-Hockley, Dair
Merritt, Naomi
Hopewell, Sally
Beard, David
Thomas, Michael
Dritsaki, Melina
Carr, Andrew J.
Findings from the patch augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) feasibility study
title Findings from the patch augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) feasibility study
title_full Findings from the patch augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) feasibility study
title_fullStr Findings from the patch augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Findings from the patch augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) feasibility study
title_short Findings from the patch augmented rotator cuff surgery (PARCS) feasibility study
title_sort findings from the patch augmented rotator cuff surgery (parcs) feasibility study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34416915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00899-9
work_keys_str_mv AT cookjonathana findingsfromthepatchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsfeasibilitystudy
AT baldwinmathew findingsfromthepatchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsfeasibilitystudy
AT coopercushla findingsfromthepatchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsfeasibilitystudy
AT nagranavrajs findingsfromthepatchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsfeasibilitystudy
AT crockerjoannac findingsfromthepatchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsfeasibilitystudy
AT glazemolly findingsfromthepatchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsfeasibilitystudy
AT greenallgemma findingsfromthepatchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsfeasibilitystudy
AT ranganamar findingsfromthepatchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsfeasibilitystudy
AT kottamlucksy findingsfromthepatchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsfeasibilitystudy
AT reesjonathanl findingsfromthepatchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsfeasibilitystudy
AT farrarhockleydair findingsfromthepatchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsfeasibilitystudy
AT merrittnaomi findingsfromthepatchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsfeasibilitystudy
AT hopewellsally findingsfromthepatchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsfeasibilitystudy
AT bearddavid findingsfromthepatchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsfeasibilitystudy
AT thomasmichael findingsfromthepatchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsfeasibilitystudy
AT dritsakimelina findingsfromthepatchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsfeasibilitystudy
AT carrandrewj findingsfromthepatchaugmentedrotatorcuffsurgeryparcsfeasibilitystudy