Cargando…

Comparison of rapid and conventional methods for investigating of mecA presence in Staphylococcus Species

OBJECTIVES: Taking the determination of mecA gene by polymerized chain reaction (PCR) method as a reference in determining methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus species, we aimed at comparing the reliability levels of disk diffusion, latex agglutination test and chromogenic agar use methods. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorgun, Selim, Isler, Hacer, Turgut, Mehmet Cenk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34475932
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.5.4274
_version_ 1783740739196289024
author Gorgun, Selim
Isler, Hacer
Turgut, Mehmet Cenk
author_facet Gorgun, Selim
Isler, Hacer
Turgut, Mehmet Cenk
author_sort Gorgun, Selim
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Taking the determination of mecA gene by polymerized chain reaction (PCR) method as a reference in determining methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus species, we aimed at comparing the reliability levels of disk diffusion, latex agglutination test and chromogenic agar use methods. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted on 228 Staphylococcus strains isolated between January 2020 and December 2020 in Samsun Training and Research Hospital. Disk diffusion, latex agglutination and chromogen agar medium methods were applied along with the polymerized chain reaction (PCR) method. RESULTS: The mecA gene was detected in 47 of the isolates (20.6%) by the PCR method, and these isolates were accepted as methicillin-resistant. When the PCR result was taken as a reference, the sensitivity of the disk diffusion method became 100%, and specificity became 45.9%; sensitivity of latex agglutination was determined as 80.9%, and specificity as 70.2%; sensitivity of chromogenic agar as 85.1% and its specificity was found to be 95%. Only in S. aureus isolates, the highest sensitivity and specificity rate (100% and 88%, respectively) belonged to chromogenic agar. CONCLUSION: Chromogenic agar provides more reliable data for S. aureus isolates, and the combined use of all three methods does not significantly increase reliability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8377928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Professional Medical Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83779282021-09-01 Comparison of rapid and conventional methods for investigating of mecA presence in Staphylococcus Species Gorgun, Selim Isler, Hacer Turgut, Mehmet Cenk Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVES: Taking the determination of mecA gene by polymerized chain reaction (PCR) method as a reference in determining methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus species, we aimed at comparing the reliability levels of disk diffusion, latex agglutination test and chromogenic agar use methods. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted on 228 Staphylococcus strains isolated between January 2020 and December 2020 in Samsun Training and Research Hospital. Disk diffusion, latex agglutination and chromogen agar medium methods were applied along with the polymerized chain reaction (PCR) method. RESULTS: The mecA gene was detected in 47 of the isolates (20.6%) by the PCR method, and these isolates were accepted as methicillin-resistant. When the PCR result was taken as a reference, the sensitivity of the disk diffusion method became 100%, and specificity became 45.9%; sensitivity of latex agglutination was determined as 80.9%, and specificity as 70.2%; sensitivity of chromogenic agar as 85.1% and its specificity was found to be 95%. Only in S. aureus isolates, the highest sensitivity and specificity rate (100% and 88%, respectively) belonged to chromogenic agar. CONCLUSION: Chromogenic agar provides more reliable data for S. aureus isolates, and the combined use of all three methods does not significantly increase reliability. Professional Medical Publications 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8377928/ /pubmed/34475932 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.5.4274 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gorgun, Selim
Isler, Hacer
Turgut, Mehmet Cenk
Comparison of rapid and conventional methods for investigating of mecA presence in Staphylococcus Species
title Comparison of rapid and conventional methods for investigating of mecA presence in Staphylococcus Species
title_full Comparison of rapid and conventional methods for investigating of mecA presence in Staphylococcus Species
title_fullStr Comparison of rapid and conventional methods for investigating of mecA presence in Staphylococcus Species
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of rapid and conventional methods for investigating of mecA presence in Staphylococcus Species
title_short Comparison of rapid and conventional methods for investigating of mecA presence in Staphylococcus Species
title_sort comparison of rapid and conventional methods for investigating of meca presence in staphylococcus species
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34475932
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.5.4274
work_keys_str_mv AT gorgunselim comparisonofrapidandconventionalmethodsforinvestigatingofmecapresenceinstaphylococcusspecies
AT islerhacer comparisonofrapidandconventionalmethodsforinvestigatingofmecapresenceinstaphylococcusspecies
AT turgutmehmetcenk comparisonofrapidandconventionalmethodsforinvestigatingofmecapresenceinstaphylococcusspecies