Cargando…

Comparative analysis of carbapenemases, RND family efflux pumps and biofilm formation potential among Acinetobacter baumannii strains with different carbapenem susceptibility

AIM: This study has conducted a comparative analysis of common carbapenemases harboring, the expression of resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) family efflux pumps, and biofilm formation potential associated with carbapenem resistance among Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) strains with di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yanpeng, Fan, Bing, Luo, Yong, Tao, Zhiyuan, Nie, Yongbo, Wang, Yongtao, Ding, Fanglin, Li, Yanwu, Gu, Dayong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34416851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06529-2
_version_ 1783740743604502528
author Zhang, Yanpeng
Fan, Bing
Luo, Yong
Tao, Zhiyuan
Nie, Yongbo
Wang, Yongtao
Ding, Fanglin
Li, Yanwu
Gu, Dayong
author_facet Zhang, Yanpeng
Fan, Bing
Luo, Yong
Tao, Zhiyuan
Nie, Yongbo
Wang, Yongtao
Ding, Fanglin
Li, Yanwu
Gu, Dayong
author_sort Zhang, Yanpeng
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study has conducted a comparative analysis of common carbapenemases harboring, the expression of resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) family efflux pumps, and biofilm formation potential associated with carbapenem resistance among Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) strains with different carbapenem susceptibility. Methods: A total of 90 isolates of A. baumannii from two tertiary hospitals of China were identified and grouped as carbapenem susceptible A. baumannii (CSAB) strains and carbapenem non-susceptible A. baumannii (CnSAB) strains based on the susceptibility to imipenem. Harboring of carbapenemase genes, relative expression of RND family efflux pumps and biofilm formation potential were compared between the two groups. Result: Among these strains, 12 (13.3 %) strains were divided into the CSAB group, and 78 (86.7 %) strains into the CnSAB group. Compared with CSAB strains, CnSAB strains increased distribution of bla(OXA−23) (p < 0.001) and ISAba1/bla(OXA−51−like) (p = 0.034) carbapenemase genes, and a 6.1-fold relative expression of adeB (p = 0.002), while CSAB strains led to biofilm formation by 1.3-fold than CnSAB strains (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically, harboring more bla(OXA−23−like) and ISAba1/bla(OXA−51−like) complex genes and overproduction of adeABC are relevant with carbapenem resistance, while carbapenem susceptible strains might survive the stress of antibiotic through their ability of higher biofilm formation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8377947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83779472021-08-23 Comparative analysis of carbapenemases, RND family efflux pumps and biofilm formation potential among Acinetobacter baumannii strains with different carbapenem susceptibility Zhang, Yanpeng Fan, Bing Luo, Yong Tao, Zhiyuan Nie, Yongbo Wang, Yongtao Ding, Fanglin Li, Yanwu Gu, Dayong BMC Infect Dis Research AIM: This study has conducted a comparative analysis of common carbapenemases harboring, the expression of resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) family efflux pumps, and biofilm formation potential associated with carbapenem resistance among Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) strains with different carbapenem susceptibility. Methods: A total of 90 isolates of A. baumannii from two tertiary hospitals of China were identified and grouped as carbapenem susceptible A. baumannii (CSAB) strains and carbapenem non-susceptible A. baumannii (CnSAB) strains based on the susceptibility to imipenem. Harboring of carbapenemase genes, relative expression of RND family efflux pumps and biofilm formation potential were compared between the two groups. Result: Among these strains, 12 (13.3 %) strains were divided into the CSAB group, and 78 (86.7 %) strains into the CnSAB group. Compared with CSAB strains, CnSAB strains increased distribution of bla(OXA−23) (p < 0.001) and ISAba1/bla(OXA−51−like) (p = 0.034) carbapenemase genes, and a 6.1-fold relative expression of adeB (p = 0.002), while CSAB strains led to biofilm formation by 1.3-fold than CnSAB strains (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically, harboring more bla(OXA−23−like) and ISAba1/bla(OXA−51−like) complex genes and overproduction of adeABC are relevant with carbapenem resistance, while carbapenem susceptible strains might survive the stress of antibiotic through their ability of higher biofilm formation. BioMed Central 2021-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8377947/ /pubmed/34416851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06529-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhang, Yanpeng
Fan, Bing
Luo, Yong
Tao, Zhiyuan
Nie, Yongbo
Wang, Yongtao
Ding, Fanglin
Li, Yanwu
Gu, Dayong
Comparative analysis of carbapenemases, RND family efflux pumps and biofilm formation potential among Acinetobacter baumannii strains with different carbapenem susceptibility
title Comparative analysis of carbapenemases, RND family efflux pumps and biofilm formation potential among Acinetobacter baumannii strains with different carbapenem susceptibility
title_full Comparative analysis of carbapenemases, RND family efflux pumps and biofilm formation potential among Acinetobacter baumannii strains with different carbapenem susceptibility
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of carbapenemases, RND family efflux pumps and biofilm formation potential among Acinetobacter baumannii strains with different carbapenem susceptibility
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of carbapenemases, RND family efflux pumps and biofilm formation potential among Acinetobacter baumannii strains with different carbapenem susceptibility
title_short Comparative analysis of carbapenemases, RND family efflux pumps and biofilm formation potential among Acinetobacter baumannii strains with different carbapenem susceptibility
title_sort comparative analysis of carbapenemases, rnd family efflux pumps and biofilm formation potential among acinetobacter baumannii strains with different carbapenem susceptibility
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8377947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34416851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06529-2
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyanpeng comparativeanalysisofcarbapenemasesrndfamilyeffluxpumpsandbiofilmformationpotentialamongacinetobacterbaumanniistrainswithdifferentcarbapenemsusceptibility
AT fanbing comparativeanalysisofcarbapenemasesrndfamilyeffluxpumpsandbiofilmformationpotentialamongacinetobacterbaumanniistrainswithdifferentcarbapenemsusceptibility
AT luoyong comparativeanalysisofcarbapenemasesrndfamilyeffluxpumpsandbiofilmformationpotentialamongacinetobacterbaumanniistrainswithdifferentcarbapenemsusceptibility
AT taozhiyuan comparativeanalysisofcarbapenemasesrndfamilyeffluxpumpsandbiofilmformationpotentialamongacinetobacterbaumanniistrainswithdifferentcarbapenemsusceptibility
AT nieyongbo comparativeanalysisofcarbapenemasesrndfamilyeffluxpumpsandbiofilmformationpotentialamongacinetobacterbaumanniistrainswithdifferentcarbapenemsusceptibility
AT wangyongtao comparativeanalysisofcarbapenemasesrndfamilyeffluxpumpsandbiofilmformationpotentialamongacinetobacterbaumanniistrainswithdifferentcarbapenemsusceptibility
AT dingfanglin comparativeanalysisofcarbapenemasesrndfamilyeffluxpumpsandbiofilmformationpotentialamongacinetobacterbaumanniistrainswithdifferentcarbapenemsusceptibility
AT liyanwu comparativeanalysisofcarbapenemasesrndfamilyeffluxpumpsandbiofilmformationpotentialamongacinetobacterbaumanniistrainswithdifferentcarbapenemsusceptibility
AT gudayong comparativeanalysisofcarbapenemasesrndfamilyeffluxpumpsandbiofilmformationpotentialamongacinetobacterbaumanniistrainswithdifferentcarbapenemsusceptibility