Cargando…

Evaluation of the quality of service delivery in private sector, primary care clinics in Kenya: A descriptive patient survey

BACKGROUND: The quality of service delivery in primary care (PC) is an important determinant of clinical outcomes. The patients’ perspective is one significant predictor of this quality. Little is known of the quality of such service delivery in the private sector in Kenya. The aim of the study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohamoud, Gulnaz, Mash, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33179953
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v62i1.5148
_version_ 1783740762305855488
author Mohamoud, Gulnaz
Mash, Robert
author_facet Mohamoud, Gulnaz
Mash, Robert
author_sort Mohamoud, Gulnaz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The quality of service delivery in primary care (PC) is an important determinant of clinical outcomes. The patients’ perspective is one significant predictor of this quality. Little is known of the quality of such service delivery in the private sector in Kenya. The aim of the study was to evaluate the quality of service delivery in private sector, PC clinics in Nairobi, Kenya. METHODS: The study employed a descriptive cross-sectional survey by using the General Practice Assessment Questionnaire in 378 randomly selected patients from 13 PC clinics. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences. RESULTS: Overall, 76% were below 45 years, 74% employed and 73% without chronic diseases. Majority (97%) were happy to see the general practitioner (GP) again, 99% were satisfied with their consultation and 83% likely to recommend the GP to others. Participants (97%) found in receptionist helpful and the majority were happy with the opening hours (73%) and waiting times (85%). Although 84% thought appointments were important, only 48% felt this was easy to make, and only 44% were able to access a particular GP on the same day. Overall satisfaction was higher in employed (98%) versus those unemployed (95%), studying (93%) or retired (94%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients reported a high quality of service delivery. Utilisation was skewed towards younger, employed adults, without chronic conditions, suggesting that PC was not fully comprehensive. Services were easily accessible, although with little expectation of relational continuity. Further studies should continue to evaluate the quality of service delivery from other perspectives and tools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8378061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83780612021-09-03 Evaluation of the quality of service delivery in private sector, primary care clinics in Kenya: A descriptive patient survey Mohamoud, Gulnaz Mash, Robert S Afr Fam Pract (2004) Original Research BACKGROUND: The quality of service delivery in primary care (PC) is an important determinant of clinical outcomes. The patients’ perspective is one significant predictor of this quality. Little is known of the quality of such service delivery in the private sector in Kenya. The aim of the study was to evaluate the quality of service delivery in private sector, PC clinics in Nairobi, Kenya. METHODS: The study employed a descriptive cross-sectional survey by using the General Practice Assessment Questionnaire in 378 randomly selected patients from 13 PC clinics. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences. RESULTS: Overall, 76% were below 45 years, 74% employed and 73% without chronic diseases. Majority (97%) were happy to see the general practitioner (GP) again, 99% were satisfied with their consultation and 83% likely to recommend the GP to others. Participants (97%) found in receptionist helpful and the majority were happy with the opening hours (73%) and waiting times (85%). Although 84% thought appointments were important, only 48% felt this was easy to make, and only 44% were able to access a particular GP on the same day. Overall satisfaction was higher in employed (98%) versus those unemployed (95%), studying (93%) or retired (94%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients reported a high quality of service delivery. Utilisation was skewed towards younger, employed adults, without chronic conditions, suggesting that PC was not fully comprehensive. Services were easily accessible, although with little expectation of relational continuity. Further studies should continue to evaluate the quality of service delivery from other perspectives and tools. AOSIS 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8378061/ /pubmed/33179953 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v62i1.5148 Text en © 2020. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mohamoud, Gulnaz
Mash, Robert
Evaluation of the quality of service delivery in private sector, primary care clinics in Kenya: A descriptive patient survey
title Evaluation of the quality of service delivery in private sector, primary care clinics in Kenya: A descriptive patient survey
title_full Evaluation of the quality of service delivery in private sector, primary care clinics in Kenya: A descriptive patient survey
title_fullStr Evaluation of the quality of service delivery in private sector, primary care clinics in Kenya: A descriptive patient survey
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the quality of service delivery in private sector, primary care clinics in Kenya: A descriptive patient survey
title_short Evaluation of the quality of service delivery in private sector, primary care clinics in Kenya: A descriptive patient survey
title_sort evaluation of the quality of service delivery in private sector, primary care clinics in kenya: a descriptive patient survey
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33179953
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v62i1.5148
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamoudgulnaz evaluationofthequalityofservicedeliveryinprivatesectorprimarycareclinicsinkenyaadescriptivepatientsurvey
AT mashrobert evaluationofthequalityofservicedeliveryinprivatesectorprimarycareclinicsinkenyaadescriptivepatientsurvey