Cargando…

Usage of smart devices amongst medical practitioners in Universitas Academic Hospital

BACKGROUND: There has been a rapid rise in the use of smart devices amongst medical practitioners throughout the world. This study aimed to identify how smart devices were being used by medical practitioners at the Universitas Academic Hospital (UAH), Bloemfontein, and the associated factors thereof...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Yeyang, Francis, Zoë, Saleem, Khayam, Sambujana, Siphamandla, Molise, Keitumetse, Molise, Boitumelo, Pearce, Nicholas, Joubert, Gina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148052
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v62i1.5029
_version_ 1783740771923394560
author Xu, Yeyang
Francis, Zoë
Saleem, Khayam
Sambujana, Siphamandla
Molise, Keitumetse
Molise, Boitumelo
Pearce, Nicholas
Joubert, Gina
author_facet Xu, Yeyang
Francis, Zoë
Saleem, Khayam
Sambujana, Siphamandla
Molise, Keitumetse
Molise, Boitumelo
Pearce, Nicholas
Joubert, Gina
author_sort Xu, Yeyang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There has been a rapid rise in the use of smart devices amongst medical practitioners throughout the world. This study aimed to identify how smart devices were being used by medical practitioners at the Universitas Academic Hospital (UAH), Bloemfontein, and the associated factors thereof. We also identified the views of medical practitioners regarding the usage of smart devices at their workplace. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted. Anonymous questionnaires were distributed to medical practitioners working at UAH during weekly departmental meetings or monthly morbidity and mortality meetings. The following largest departments were included: Surgery, Anaesthetics, Paediatrics, Internal Medicine, Family Medicine, and Obstetrics and Gynaecology. RESULTS: The response rate was 82.7% of those attending the meetings. All the respondents owned a smart device and brought it to their workplace. The most common applications used on these smart devices were that for drug references (65.9%), medical textbooks (63.6%) and medical calculators (58.1%). Significantly larger percentages of doctors aged 21–39 years compared with those aged 40–65 years used drug reference applications and medical calculators. A quarter (24.8%) of respondents communicated with patients through a smart device, 21.7% used an online storage platform to backup patient data, whilst 56.6% used their devices to store and view patient information. More than one-third (36.7%) agreed that smart devices threatened patient confidentiality, but the majority (58.8%) did not agree that these devices hinder patient communication. The majority felt that these devices improved both personal performance (69.2%) and patient care (79.0%). CONCLUSION: Smart devices usage is common in this setting. Hence, integration of such usage in medical curricula, discussion on professionalism, ethics and confidentiality in this context, and guidance from institutions and professional bodies become necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8378102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83781022021-09-03 Usage of smart devices amongst medical practitioners in Universitas Academic Hospital Xu, Yeyang Francis, Zoë Saleem, Khayam Sambujana, Siphamandla Molise, Keitumetse Molise, Boitumelo Pearce, Nicholas Joubert, Gina S Afr Fam Pract (2004) Original Research BACKGROUND: There has been a rapid rise in the use of smart devices amongst medical practitioners throughout the world. This study aimed to identify how smart devices were being used by medical practitioners at the Universitas Academic Hospital (UAH), Bloemfontein, and the associated factors thereof. We also identified the views of medical practitioners regarding the usage of smart devices at their workplace. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted. Anonymous questionnaires were distributed to medical practitioners working at UAH during weekly departmental meetings or monthly morbidity and mortality meetings. The following largest departments were included: Surgery, Anaesthetics, Paediatrics, Internal Medicine, Family Medicine, and Obstetrics and Gynaecology. RESULTS: The response rate was 82.7% of those attending the meetings. All the respondents owned a smart device and brought it to their workplace. The most common applications used on these smart devices were that for drug references (65.9%), medical textbooks (63.6%) and medical calculators (58.1%). Significantly larger percentages of doctors aged 21–39 years compared with those aged 40–65 years used drug reference applications and medical calculators. A quarter (24.8%) of respondents communicated with patients through a smart device, 21.7% used an online storage platform to backup patient data, whilst 56.6% used their devices to store and view patient information. More than one-third (36.7%) agreed that smart devices threatened patient confidentiality, but the majority (58.8%) did not agree that these devices hinder patient communication. The majority felt that these devices improved both personal performance (69.2%) and patient care (79.0%). CONCLUSION: Smart devices usage is common in this setting. Hence, integration of such usage in medical curricula, discussion on professionalism, ethics and confidentiality in this context, and guidance from institutions and professional bodies become necessary. AOSIS 2020-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8378102/ /pubmed/32148052 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v62i1.5029 Text en © 2020. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Xu, Yeyang
Francis, Zoë
Saleem, Khayam
Sambujana, Siphamandla
Molise, Keitumetse
Molise, Boitumelo
Pearce, Nicholas
Joubert, Gina
Usage of smart devices amongst medical practitioners in Universitas Academic Hospital
title Usage of smart devices amongst medical practitioners in Universitas Academic Hospital
title_full Usage of smart devices amongst medical practitioners in Universitas Academic Hospital
title_fullStr Usage of smart devices amongst medical practitioners in Universitas Academic Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Usage of smart devices amongst medical practitioners in Universitas Academic Hospital
title_short Usage of smart devices amongst medical practitioners in Universitas Academic Hospital
title_sort usage of smart devices amongst medical practitioners in universitas academic hospital
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148052
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v62i1.5029
work_keys_str_mv AT xuyeyang usageofsmartdevicesamongstmedicalpractitionersinuniversitasacademichospital
AT franciszoe usageofsmartdevicesamongstmedicalpractitionersinuniversitasacademichospital
AT saleemkhayam usageofsmartdevicesamongstmedicalpractitionersinuniversitasacademichospital
AT sambujanasiphamandla usageofsmartdevicesamongstmedicalpractitionersinuniversitasacademichospital
AT molisekeitumetse usageofsmartdevicesamongstmedicalpractitionersinuniversitasacademichospital
AT moliseboitumelo usageofsmartdevicesamongstmedicalpractitionersinuniversitasacademichospital
AT pearcenicholas usageofsmartdevicesamongstmedicalpractitionersinuniversitasacademichospital
AT joubertgina usageofsmartdevicesamongstmedicalpractitionersinuniversitasacademichospital