Cargando…

Screening for depression at the primary care level: Evidence for policy decision-making from a facility in Pretoria, South Africa

BACKGROUND: Depression is a serious public health issue that has clinical, social and economic implications. Adult patients attending a primary healthcare (PHC) facility were screened in order to estimate the prevalence of depressive features and identify potential risk factors for screening positiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mashaba, Bahupileng L., Moodley, Saiendhra V., Ledibane, Neo R.T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33567836
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v63i1.5217
_version_ 1783740785662885888
author Mashaba, Bahupileng L.
Moodley, Saiendhra V.
Ledibane, Neo R.T.
author_facet Mashaba, Bahupileng L.
Moodley, Saiendhra V.
Ledibane, Neo R.T.
author_sort Mashaba, Bahupileng L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Depression is a serious public health issue that has clinical, social and economic implications. Adult patients attending a primary healthcare (PHC) facility were screened in order to estimate the prevalence of depressive features and identify potential risk factors for screening positive. METHODS: This was an analytical cross-sectional study conducted at a clinic in Pretoria, South Africa. A self-administered questionnaire, which included the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) screening tool, was completed by patients attending the clinic. A PHQ-9 score of less than five was deemed as a negative screen for depressive features; with a score of five or more being considered a positive screen. A multivariate logistic regression model was developed to identify factors associated with a positive screen for depressive features. RESULTS: A total of 199 patients participated and the proportion screened positive for depressive features using the PHQ-9 tool was 46.23% (n = 92). Employed participants had significantly lower odds (odds ratio [OR] = 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25 – 0.94) of screening positive, whilst the participants with significantly higher odds were those with co-morbidities (OR = 2.12; 95% CI: 1.08 – 4.17) and a history of stressful life events (OR = 3.21; 95% CI: 1.64 – 6.28). CONCLUSION: Depression appears to be a significant problem in PHC settings in South Africa. Screening for depressive features at primary level, targeting those with chronic medical conditions, history of recent stressful life events and other known risk factors may improve detection rates, lead to earlier diagnosis and improved health outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8378166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83781662021-09-03 Screening for depression at the primary care level: Evidence for policy decision-making from a facility in Pretoria, South Africa Mashaba, Bahupileng L. Moodley, Saiendhra V. Ledibane, Neo R.T. S Afr Fam Pract (2004) Original Research BACKGROUND: Depression is a serious public health issue that has clinical, social and economic implications. Adult patients attending a primary healthcare (PHC) facility were screened in order to estimate the prevalence of depressive features and identify potential risk factors for screening positive. METHODS: This was an analytical cross-sectional study conducted at a clinic in Pretoria, South Africa. A self-administered questionnaire, which included the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) screening tool, was completed by patients attending the clinic. A PHQ-9 score of less than five was deemed as a negative screen for depressive features; with a score of five or more being considered a positive screen. A multivariate logistic regression model was developed to identify factors associated with a positive screen for depressive features. RESULTS: A total of 199 patients participated and the proportion screened positive for depressive features using the PHQ-9 tool was 46.23% (n = 92). Employed participants had significantly lower odds (odds ratio [OR] = 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25 – 0.94) of screening positive, whilst the participants with significantly higher odds were those with co-morbidities (OR = 2.12; 95% CI: 1.08 – 4.17) and a history of stressful life events (OR = 3.21; 95% CI: 1.64 – 6.28). CONCLUSION: Depression appears to be a significant problem in PHC settings in South Africa. Screening for depressive features at primary level, targeting those with chronic medical conditions, history of recent stressful life events and other known risk factors may improve detection rates, lead to earlier diagnosis and improved health outcomes. AOSIS 2021-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8378166/ /pubmed/33567836 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v63i1.5217 Text en © 2021. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mashaba, Bahupileng L.
Moodley, Saiendhra V.
Ledibane, Neo R.T.
Screening for depression at the primary care level: Evidence for policy decision-making from a facility in Pretoria, South Africa
title Screening for depression at the primary care level: Evidence for policy decision-making from a facility in Pretoria, South Africa
title_full Screening for depression at the primary care level: Evidence for policy decision-making from a facility in Pretoria, South Africa
title_fullStr Screening for depression at the primary care level: Evidence for policy decision-making from a facility in Pretoria, South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Screening for depression at the primary care level: Evidence for policy decision-making from a facility in Pretoria, South Africa
title_short Screening for depression at the primary care level: Evidence for policy decision-making from a facility in Pretoria, South Africa
title_sort screening for depression at the primary care level: evidence for policy decision-making from a facility in pretoria, south africa
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33567836
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v63i1.5217
work_keys_str_mv AT mashababahupilengl screeningfordepressionattheprimarycarelevelevidenceforpolicydecisionmakingfromafacilityinpretoriasouthafrica
AT moodleysaiendhrav screeningfordepressionattheprimarycarelevelevidenceforpolicydecisionmakingfromafacilityinpretoriasouthafrica
AT ledibaneneort screeningfordepressionattheprimarycarelevelevidenceforpolicydecisionmakingfromafacilityinpretoriasouthafrica